How can family members of patients in the intensive care unit be supported? A systematic review of qualitative reviews, meta-synthesis, and novel recommendations for nursing care

{"title":"How can family members of patients in the intensive care unit be supported? A systematic review of qualitative reviews, meta-synthesis, and novel recommendations for nursing care","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Families are an important part of the intensive care unit (ICU) team. Being a family member in the ICU can be distressing due to interacting factors, such as the critical condition of the patient, the responsibility of acting as the patient's advocate, and partaking in decision-making related to treatment. Nurses need to be aware of the family's well-being throughout the patient's ICU stay.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To synthesize reviews of family members' experiences and needs during patients' ICU admission and develop recommendations to support nurses in strengthening their relationships with families.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Systematic review of qualitative and mixed method reviews.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>Extensive searches without time limits identified systematic reviews published until June 27, 2024 in CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Reviews were eligible if they provided knowledge required to inform high-quality on-site family care during the patient's ICU admission.</div></div><div><h3>Review methods</h3><div>Quality appraisal adhered to the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for systematic reviews and research syntheses. Themes were generated by integrating review results and narratively summarizing the main contents. Finally, findings were translated into clinical practice recommendations by using the four-component GRADE-CERQual assessment (low to high recommendation grades). Recommendations were backtracked to primary research studies for validation. All recommendations were critically reflected upon with an expert panel of ICU nurses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The nine included reviews were built on 124 original studies published between 1995 and 2021. One central theme, “Emotional limbo and extreme moments”, mirrored the core of families' experiences characterized by waiting time, i.e., for the patient to get better or worse, and overwhelming emotions and confusion brought about by the patient's critical illness. Three sub-themes reflected actions to counterbalance emotional challenges: a) Responding to family members' existential needs, b) Establishing optimal grounds for reciprocal communication, and c) Enhancing a humanizing approach and atmosphere in the ICU. The meta-synthesis resulted in 11 aggregated recommendations. The findings highlighted that nurses should proactively address emotional issues to help preserve families' ability to keep going, allow families to be present and function as a part of the team, and inform families of the patient's situation and how they can practically help.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Nurses should use multiple adjustable approaches to alleviate family's burden during an ICU stay. Findings help nurses to prioritize care and make physical and emotional space for family caregivers. Results emphasize the need to facilitate the agency of family caregivers and reinforce their strengths through nurse-family dialogues.</div></div><div><h3>Tweetable abstract</h3><div>Novel recommendations to enhance nursing care of family members to patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X2400078X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Families are an important part of the intensive care unit (ICU) team. Being a family member in the ICU can be distressing due to interacting factors, such as the critical condition of the patient, the responsibility of acting as the patient's advocate, and partaking in decision-making related to treatment. Nurses need to be aware of the family's well-being throughout the patient's ICU stay.

Objective

To synthesize reviews of family members' experiences and needs during patients' ICU admission and develop recommendations to support nurses in strengthening their relationships with families.

Design

Systematic review of qualitative and mixed method reviews.

Data sources

Extensive searches without time limits identified systematic reviews published until June 27, 2024 in CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Reviews were eligible if they provided knowledge required to inform high-quality on-site family care during the patient's ICU admission.

Review methods

Quality appraisal adhered to the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for systematic reviews and research syntheses. Themes were generated by integrating review results and narratively summarizing the main contents. Finally, findings were translated into clinical practice recommendations by using the four-component GRADE-CERQual assessment (low to high recommendation grades). Recommendations were backtracked to primary research studies for validation. All recommendations were critically reflected upon with an expert panel of ICU nurses.

Results

The nine included reviews were built on 124 original studies published between 1995 and 2021. One central theme, “Emotional limbo and extreme moments”, mirrored the core of families' experiences characterized by waiting time, i.e., for the patient to get better or worse, and overwhelming emotions and confusion brought about by the patient's critical illness. Three sub-themes reflected actions to counterbalance emotional challenges: a) Responding to family members' existential needs, b) Establishing optimal grounds for reciprocal communication, and c) Enhancing a humanizing approach and atmosphere in the ICU. The meta-synthesis resulted in 11 aggregated recommendations. The findings highlighted that nurses should proactively address emotional issues to help preserve families' ability to keep going, allow families to be present and function as a part of the team, and inform families of the patient's situation and how they can practically help.

Conclusions

Nurses should use multiple adjustable approaches to alleviate family's burden during an ICU stay. Findings help nurses to prioritize care and make physical and emotional space for family caregivers. Results emphasize the need to facilitate the agency of family caregivers and reinforce their strengths through nurse-family dialogues.

Tweetable abstract

Novel recommendations to enhance nursing care of family members to patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何为重症监护病房的患者家属提供支持?定性综述、元综合和护理新建议的系统回顾
背景家属是重症监护病房(ICU)团队的重要组成部分。作为重症监护病房的家属可能会因各种相互作用的因素而感到痛苦,例如患者的危重病情、作为患者代言人的责任以及参与与治疗相关的决策。护士需要在患者入住重症监护室的整个过程中关注患者家属的健康状况。目的综述患者入住重症监护室期间患者家属的经历和需求,并提出建议以支持护士加强与患者家属的关系。综述方法根据乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的系统综述和研究综述清单进行质量评估。通过对综述结果进行整合并对主要内容进行叙述性总结,得出主题。最后,通过 GRADE-CERQual 评估(推荐等级从低到高)的四个组成部分,将研究结果转化为临床实践建议。所有建议均追溯到原始研究,以进行验证。由 ICU 护士组成的专家小组对所有建议进行了批判性反思。其中一个中心主题 "情绪边缘和极端时刻 "反映了家属的核心经历,其特点是等待时间,即等待病人好转或恶化,以及病人危重疾病带来的难以承受的情绪和困惑。三个次主题反映了抵消情绪挑战的行动:a) 应对家庭成员的生存需求;b) 为相互沟通建立最佳基础;c) 加强重症监护室的人性化方法和氛围。元综合得出了 11 项综合建议。研究结果强调,护士应积极主动地解决情绪问题,以帮助保持家属继续治疗的能力,允许家属作为团队的一部分在场并发挥作用,并告知家属患者的情况以及他们可以如何提供实际帮助。研究结果有助于护士确定护理工作的优先次序,并为家属护理人员留出身体和情感空间。结果强调有必要通过护士与家属的对话来促进家属照顾者的能动性并加强他们的力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
期刊最新文献
Nurse leaders’ recommendations for implementing LGBTQ+ inclusive practices in health systems: A qualitative descriptive study Nursing interventions in a newly established community health nursing system: A cross sectional survey Grit, academic resilience, and mindset of nursing students: A cross-sectional study Psychological safety in enhancing the competence of nurse educators among early career nursing faculty in Japan: A cross-sectional study How can family members of patients in the intensive care unit be supported? A systematic review of qualitative reviews, meta-synthesis, and novel recommendations for nursing care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1