Ectomycorrhizal hydrophobicity and host association influence ectomycorrhizal C dynamics, N dynamics, and fruiting patterns in N addition experiments under pine
Erik A. Hobbie, Georg Jocher, Matthias Peichl, Peng Zhao, Zaixing Zhou, Niles J. Hasselquist
{"title":"Ectomycorrhizal hydrophobicity and host association influence ectomycorrhizal C dynamics, N dynamics, and fruiting patterns in N addition experiments under pine","authors":"Erik A. Hobbie, Georg Jocher, Matthias Peichl, Peng Zhao, Zaixing Zhou, Niles J. Hasselquist","doi":"10.1007/s11104-024-07022-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Fungal traits such as host specificity and hydrophobicity of ectomycorrhizae may correspond to functional attributes including enzymatic capabilities, carbon (C) demand from host plants, temporal patterns of fruiting, C sequestration, and nitrogen (N) sequestration. Here, we assessed how these traits influenced the timing of C dynamics and fungal processing of C and N, as integrated by patterns of δ<sup>13</sup>C, δ<sup>15</sup>N, %N, and timing of ectomycorrhizal sporocarp production.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We linked these sporocarp patterns to ectomycorrhizal hydrophobicity, host specificity, and daily gross primary production (GPP) across seven N fertilization treatments in two Swedish <i>Pinus sylvestris</i> forests.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>GPP of eight and 7–10 days prior to collection correlated positively with δ<sup>13</sup>C and negatively with %N, respectively, for ~ 80% of sporocarps, reflecting transit times of peak delivery of plant-derived carbohydrates to sporocarp formation. Hydrophobic taxa fruited 7–10 days later than hydrophilic taxa and conifer-specific sporocarps averaged four days later than generalists. Hydrophobic taxa and conifer-specific taxa were higher in δ<sup>15</sup>N than hydrophilic taxa and generalist-associated taxa.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Higher δ<sup>15</sup>N and later sporocarp collections suggested greater C demands for hydrophobic and conifer-specific taxa than for hydrophilic and generalist taxa. C accumulation times and high sequestration (hydrophobic taxa, host-specific taxa) versus low sequestration (hydrophilic taxa, generalist taxa) of <sup>15</sup>N-depleted chitin and <sup>13</sup>C-enriched carbohydrates in mycelia could account for late fruiting, <sup>15</sup>N enrichment, and <sup>13</sup>C depletion of hydrophobic taxa. We conclude that sporocarp production, hydrophobicity, and host specificity integrated functional information about belowground hyphal development and C accumulation times of C transfers from host <i>Pinus</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07022-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Fungal traits such as host specificity and hydrophobicity of ectomycorrhizae may correspond to functional attributes including enzymatic capabilities, carbon (C) demand from host plants, temporal patterns of fruiting, C sequestration, and nitrogen (N) sequestration. Here, we assessed how these traits influenced the timing of C dynamics and fungal processing of C and N, as integrated by patterns of δ13C, δ15N, %N, and timing of ectomycorrhizal sporocarp production.
Methods
We linked these sporocarp patterns to ectomycorrhizal hydrophobicity, host specificity, and daily gross primary production (GPP) across seven N fertilization treatments in two Swedish Pinus sylvestris forests.
Results
GPP of eight and 7–10 days prior to collection correlated positively with δ13C and negatively with %N, respectively, for ~ 80% of sporocarps, reflecting transit times of peak delivery of plant-derived carbohydrates to sporocarp formation. Hydrophobic taxa fruited 7–10 days later than hydrophilic taxa and conifer-specific sporocarps averaged four days later than generalists. Hydrophobic taxa and conifer-specific taxa were higher in δ15N than hydrophilic taxa and generalist-associated taxa.
Conclusions
Higher δ15N and later sporocarp collections suggested greater C demands for hydrophobic and conifer-specific taxa than for hydrophilic and generalist taxa. C accumulation times and high sequestration (hydrophobic taxa, host-specific taxa) versus low sequestration (hydrophilic taxa, generalist taxa) of 15N-depleted chitin and 13C-enriched carbohydrates in mycelia could account for late fruiting, 15N enrichment, and 13C depletion of hydrophobic taxa. We conclude that sporocarp production, hydrophobicity, and host specificity integrated functional information about belowground hyphal development and C accumulation times of C transfers from host Pinus.
期刊介绍:
Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.