Acceptability of a Fresh Produce Intervention for Individuals With Serious Mental Illnesses.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2024.10.001
Gabriella Farland, Leah G Pope, En Fu, Dana Cohen, Cheryl Gerstler, Merrill Rotter, Michael T Compton
{"title":"Acceptability of a Fresh Produce Intervention for Individuals With Serious Mental Illnesses.","authors":"Gabriella Farland, Leah G Pope, En Fu, Dana Cohen, Cheryl Gerstler, Merrill Rotter, Michael T Compton","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To qualitatively evaluate the acceptability and end-user perspectives of a 3-component Fresh Produce and Healthy Eating intervention seeking to increase fruit and vegetable consumption among individuals with serious mental illnesses (SMI) in residential settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-seven interviews were conducted with housing residents with SMI, curriculum instructors, agency leadership, and mobile market staff. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each intervention component had high levels of acceptability. Residents perceived improved knowledge and self-efficacy for preparing and eating produce, and instructors noted impacts on their eating habits. Barriers to program implementation included logistical hurdles. Recommendations for improvement related to kitchen space, safety protocols, transportation, and skill building.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Findings reveal the acceptability of this novel intervention. Future research is needed to understand how this intervention may require modifications for different subpopulations of people with SMI or residential settings. Additional research is warranted to track sustainability and effectiveness in changing dietary habits.</p>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2024.10.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To qualitatively evaluate the acceptability and end-user perspectives of a 3-component Fresh Produce and Healthy Eating intervention seeking to increase fruit and vegetable consumption among individuals with serious mental illnesses (SMI) in residential settings.

Methods: Twenty-seven interviews were conducted with housing residents with SMI, curriculum instructors, agency leadership, and mobile market staff. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Each intervention component had high levels of acceptability. Residents perceived improved knowledge and self-efficacy for preparing and eating produce, and instructors noted impacts on their eating habits. Barriers to program implementation included logistical hurdles. Recommendations for improvement related to kitchen space, safety protocols, transportation, and skill building.

Conclusions and implications: Findings reveal the acceptability of this novel intervention. Future research is needed to understand how this intervention may require modifications for different subpopulations of people with SMI or residential settings. Additional research is warranted to track sustainability and effectiveness in changing dietary habits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对严重精神疾病患者进行新鲜农产品干预的可接受性。
目的定性评估由三个部分组成的 "新鲜农产品和健康饮食 "干预措施的可接受性和最终用户的观点,该干预措施旨在增加居住环境中患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的个人的水果和蔬菜消费量:对患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的居住者、课程指导者、机构领导和流动市场工作人员进行了 27 次访谈。采用主题分析法对访谈进行了分析:结果:每项干预内容的可接受性都很高。居民认为自己在准备和食用农产品方面的知识和自我效能得到了提高,指导员也注意到了对他们饮食习惯的影响。计划实施的障碍包括后勤障碍。改进建议涉及厨房空间、安全协议、交通和技能培养:调查结果揭示了这种新型干预措施的可接受性。今后还需要开展研究,以了解针对不同的 SMI 患者亚群或居住环境,该干预措施可能需要做出哪些修改。还需要进行更多的研究,以追踪改变饮食习惯的可持续性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas. The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
期刊最新文献
Acceptability of a Fresh Produce Intervention for Individuals With Serious Mental Illnesses. Development of Educational Whiteboard Videos for Head Start Teachers on How to Implement Food-based Learning in the Preschool Classroom. Deciphering Dichos for Nutrition and Health Discussion: A Qualitative Study Among Men of Mexican Origin With or At-Risk of Type 2 Diabetes. Acceptability of Pilot School-based Food Pantries Compared With Weekend Feeding BackPack Programs Among Food Pantry Clients in Rural Tennessee: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1