Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy is safe for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated by chemoradiotherapy compared with open pancreatoduodenectomy: A matched case-control study.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.041
Elias Karam, Charlotte Rondé-Roupie, Béatrice Aussilhou, Olivia Hentic, Vinciane Rebours, Mickaël Lesurtel, Alain Sauvanet, Safi Dokmak
{"title":"Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy is safe for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated by chemoradiotherapy compared with open pancreatoduodenectomy: A matched case-control study.","authors":"Elias Karam, Charlotte Rondé-Roupie, Béatrice Aussilhou, Olivia Hentic, Vinciane Rebours, Mickaël Lesurtel, Alain Sauvanet, Safi Dokmak","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies compared laparoscopic and open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort of patients who underwent laparoscopic or open pancreatoduodenectomy for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after chemoradiotherapy between 2012 and 2023 was analyzed. Open pancreatoduodenectomy patients could theoretically benefit from the laparoscopic approach. We used a 1:2 (laparoscopic-to-open pancreatoduodenectomy) propensity score matching analysis stratified on age, gender, and body mass index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 128 patients (33 laparoscopic and 95 open pancreatoduodenectomy), and after propensity score matching, 33 laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy and 66 open pancreatoduodenectomy were compared. There was no difference in demographic data except for lower tobacco use in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy group (9% vs 30%, P = .023) with similar clinical presentation. Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy showed a longer median operative duration (380 vs 255 minutes, P < .001), shorter median length of resected vein (15 vs 23 mm, P = .01), longer median venous clamping time (29 vs 15 minutes, P = .005), similar median blood loss (300 vs 300 mL, P = .223), similar rate of hard pancreas (97% vs 85%, P = .094), and a larger median size of Wirsung duct (5 vs 4 mm, P = .02). Postoperative outcomes showed similar 90-day mortality rates (3% vs 3%, P > .99), Clavien-Dindo III-IV complications (6% vs 14%, P = .158), median lengths of hospital stay (12 vs 13 days, P = .409), and readmission rates (9% vs 18%, P = .366). Pathologic data showed similar R0 resection rates (88% vs 82%, P = .568). With a similar rate of adjuvant chemotherapy (P = .324) and shorter median follow-up with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (18 vs 34 months, P = .004), 3-year overall (P = .768) and disease-free (P = .839) survival rates were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In selected patients, laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy appears to be safe and feasible when performed in experienced centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Few studies compared laparoscopic and open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Methods: Retrospective cohort of patients who underwent laparoscopic or open pancreatoduodenectomy for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after chemoradiotherapy between 2012 and 2023 was analyzed. Open pancreatoduodenectomy patients could theoretically benefit from the laparoscopic approach. We used a 1:2 (laparoscopic-to-open pancreatoduodenectomy) propensity score matching analysis stratified on age, gender, and body mass index.

Results: We included 128 patients (33 laparoscopic and 95 open pancreatoduodenectomy), and after propensity score matching, 33 laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy and 66 open pancreatoduodenectomy were compared. There was no difference in demographic data except for lower tobacco use in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy group (9% vs 30%, P = .023) with similar clinical presentation. Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy showed a longer median operative duration (380 vs 255 minutes, P < .001), shorter median length of resected vein (15 vs 23 mm, P = .01), longer median venous clamping time (29 vs 15 minutes, P = .005), similar median blood loss (300 vs 300 mL, P = .223), similar rate of hard pancreas (97% vs 85%, P = .094), and a larger median size of Wirsung duct (5 vs 4 mm, P = .02). Postoperative outcomes showed similar 90-day mortality rates (3% vs 3%, P > .99), Clavien-Dindo III-IV complications (6% vs 14%, P = .158), median lengths of hospital stay (12 vs 13 days, P = .409), and readmission rates (9% vs 18%, P = .366). Pathologic data showed similar R0 resection rates (88% vs 82%, P = .568). With a similar rate of adjuvant chemotherapy (P = .324) and shorter median follow-up with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (18 vs 34 months, P = .004), 3-year overall (P = .768) and disease-free (P = .839) survival rates were similar.

Conclusion: In selected patients, laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy appears to be safe and feasible when performed in experienced centers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与开腹胰十二指肠切除术相比,腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术治疗化放疗胰腺导管腺癌是安全的:一项匹配病例对照研究。
背景:很少有研究比较新辅助化疗后的胰腺导管腺癌腹腔镜和开腹胰十二指肠切除术:很少有研究对新辅助化放疗后胰腺导管腺癌的腹腔镜和开腹胰十二指肠切除术进行比较:分析了2012年至2023年间因化疗后可切除或边缘可切除胰腺导管腺癌而接受腹腔镜或开腹胰十二指肠切除术的患者回顾性队列。开腹胰十二指肠切除术患者理论上可以从腹腔镜方法中获益。我们采用了1:2(腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术对开腹胰十二指肠切除术)倾向得分匹配分析,并根据年龄、性别和体重指数进行了分层:我们纳入了128名患者(33名腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术患者和95名开腹胰十二指肠切除术患者),经过倾向得分匹配后,比较了33名腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术患者和66名开腹胰十二指肠切除术患者。除腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术组吸烟率较低外(9% vs 30%,P = .023),其他人口统计学数据无差异,临床表现相似。腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术与开腹胰十二指肠切除术相比,中位手术时间更长(380 分钟对 255 分钟,P < .001),切除静脉的中位长度更短(15 毫米对 23 毫米,P = .01),中位静脉夹闭时间更长(29 分钟对 15 分钟,P = .005),中位失血量相似(300 毫升对 300 毫升,P = .223),硬胰腺率相似(97% 对 85%,P = .094),Wirsung 管中位尺寸更大(5 毫米对 4 毫米,P = .02)。术后结果显示,90 天死亡率(3% vs 3%,P > .99)、Clavien-Dindo III-IV 并发症(6% vs 14%,P = .158)、中位住院时间(12 vs 13 天,P = .409)和再入院率(9% vs 18%,P = .366)相似。病理数据显示,R0切除率相似(88% vs 82%,P = .568)。腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的辅助化疗率相似(P = .324),中位随访时间较短(18 个月 vs 34 个月,P = .004),3 年总生存率(P = .768)和无病生存率(P = .839)相似:结论:在有经验的中心,对经过新辅助化放疗的胰腺导管腺癌患者进行腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术似乎是安全可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
期刊最新文献
Regarding: "Does using artificial intelligence take the person out of personal statements? We can't tell". Response to letter to the editor on "Long-term lorazepam use may be associated with worse long-term outcomes among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma". Response to letter to the editor: "Team member familiarity and team effectiveness in the operating room: The mediating effect of mutual trust and shared mental models". The importance of a vice chair in a department of surgery: A chair's perspective. Letter to the editor on "Trends and predictors of laparoscopic compared with open emergent inguinal hernia repair".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1