Characterizing heatwaves based on land surface energy budget

IF 8.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Communications Earth & Environment Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1038/s43247-024-01784-y
Yinglin Tian, Axel Kleidon, Corey Lesk, Sha Zhou, Xiangzhong Luo, Sarosh Alam Ghausi, Guangqian Wang, Deyu Zhong, Jakob Zscheischler
{"title":"Characterizing heatwaves based on land surface energy budget","authors":"Yinglin Tian, Axel Kleidon, Corey Lesk, Sha Zhou, Xiangzhong Luo, Sarosh Alam Ghausi, Guangqian Wang, Deyu Zhong, Jakob Zscheischler","doi":"10.1038/s43247-024-01784-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Heat extremes pose pronounced threats to social-ecological systems and are projected to become more intense, frequent, and longer. However, the mechanisms driving heatwaves vary across heatwave types and are not yet fully understood. Here we decompose perturbations in the surface energy budget to categorize global heatwave-days into four distinct types: sunny–humid (38%), sunny-dry (26%), advective (18%), and adiabatic (18%). Notably, sunny-dry heatwave-days decrease net ecosystem carbon uptake by 0.09 gC m−2 day−1 over harvested areas, while advective heatwave-days increase the thermal stress index by 6.20 K in populated regions. In addition, from 2000 to 2020, sunny-dry heatwaves have shown the most widespread increase compared to 1979 to 1999, with 67% of terrestrial areas experiencing a doubling in their occurrence. Our findings highlight the importance of classifying heatwave-days based on their underlying mechanisms, as this can enhance our understanding of heatwaves and improve strategies for heat adaptation. Global heatwave days can be classified into sunny-humid, sunny-dry, advective, and adiabatic types, with sunny-dry days showing the most widespread increase from 2000 to 2020, causing carbon uptake reduction, while advective days increase human thermal stress, according to surface energy budget perturbations analysis.","PeriodicalId":10530,"journal":{"name":"Communications Earth & Environment","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01784-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Earth & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01784-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Heat extremes pose pronounced threats to social-ecological systems and are projected to become more intense, frequent, and longer. However, the mechanisms driving heatwaves vary across heatwave types and are not yet fully understood. Here we decompose perturbations in the surface energy budget to categorize global heatwave-days into four distinct types: sunny–humid (38%), sunny-dry (26%), advective (18%), and adiabatic (18%). Notably, sunny-dry heatwave-days decrease net ecosystem carbon uptake by 0.09 gC m−2 day−1 over harvested areas, while advective heatwave-days increase the thermal stress index by 6.20 K in populated regions. In addition, from 2000 to 2020, sunny-dry heatwaves have shown the most widespread increase compared to 1979 to 1999, with 67% of terrestrial areas experiencing a doubling in their occurrence. Our findings highlight the importance of classifying heatwave-days based on their underlying mechanisms, as this can enhance our understanding of heatwaves and improve strategies for heat adaptation. Global heatwave days can be classified into sunny-humid, sunny-dry, advective, and adiabatic types, with sunny-dry days showing the most widespread increase from 2000 to 2020, causing carbon uptake reduction, while advective days increase human thermal stress, according to surface energy budget perturbations analysis.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据陆地表面能量预算确定热浪特征
极端热浪对社会生态系统构成了明显的威胁,而且预计会变得更加剧烈、频繁和持久。然而,驱动热浪的机制因热浪类型而异,目前尚不完全清楚。在这里,我们分解了地表能量预算的扰动,将全球热浪日分为四种不同类型:晴热潮湿型(38%)、晴热干燥型(26%)、对流型(18%)和绝热型(18%)。值得注意的是,晴朗-干燥热浪日会使收获地区的生态系统净碳吸收量减少 0.09 gC m-2 day-1,而平流热浪日则会使人口稠密地区的热应力指数增加 6.20 K。此外,与 1979 年至 1999 年相比,2000 年至 2020 年期间,晴朗-干燥热浪的增加最为普遍,67% 的陆地地区的热浪发生率增加了一倍。我们的研究结果凸显了根据热浪日的基本机制对其进行分类的重要性,因为这可以加深我们对热浪的理解,并改进热适应战略。根据地表能量收支扰动分析,全球热浪日可分为晴朗潮湿型、晴朗干燥型、对流型和绝热型,其中晴朗干燥型热浪日在2000年至2020年期间增幅最大,导致碳吸收减少,而对流型热浪日则增加了人类的热应力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Communications Earth & Environment
Communications Earth & Environment Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
269
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Communications Earth & Environment is an open access journal from Nature Portfolio publishing high-quality research, reviews and commentary in all areas of the Earth, environmental and planetary sciences. Research papers published by the journal represent significant advances that bring new insight to a specialized area in Earth science, planetary science or environmental science. Communications Earth & Environment has a 2-year impact factor of 7.9 (2022 Journal Citation Reports®). Articles published in the journal in 2022 were downloaded 1,412,858 times. Median time from submission to the first editorial decision is 8 days.
期刊最新文献
Habitat suitability models reveal extensive distribution of deep warm-water coral frameworks in the Red Sea Health benefits of reduced deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon The key role of forest disturbance in reconciling estimates of the northern carbon sink Climate change scenarios forecast increased drought exposure for terrestrial vertebrates in the contiguous United States Unveiling the devastating effect of the spring 2022 mega-heatwave on the South Asian snowpack
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1