Cancer mortality among solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Preventive medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108161
Zhipeng Wang , Lihong Deng , Wen Hou , Shiyu Liu , Yacong Zhang , Chao Sheng , Yu Zhang , Jun Li , Zhongyang Shen
{"title":"Cancer mortality among solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Zhipeng Wang ,&nbsp;Lihong Deng ,&nbsp;Wen Hou ,&nbsp;Shiyu Liu ,&nbsp;Yacong Zhang ,&nbsp;Chao Sheng ,&nbsp;Yu Zhang ,&nbsp;Jun Li ,&nbsp;Zhongyang Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the cancer mortality risk among solid organ transplant recipients through a systematic review and meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed (starting from 1965), ISI Web of Science (starting from 1900), MEDLINE (starting from 1976), and Scopus (starting from 1968) from the inception of each database until July 15, 2024. Studies published in English reporting at least one type of cancer mortality risk among recipients of any type of solid organ transplantation were included. The main outcomes were the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) for cancer mortality in transplant recipients compared to the general population, and the hazard ratio (HR) for cancer mortality in transplant recipients versus cancer patients without prior transplantation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Solid organ transplant recipients had a 2.06-fold increased cancer mortality risk (SMR, 2.06 [95 % CI, 1.56–2.71]) than the general population. Risks were higher in kidney (SMR 1.92 [95 % CI: 1.30–2.84]), liver (SMR 3.07 [95 % CI: 1.80–5.24]), and lung/heart (SMR 4.87 [95 % CI: 3.33–7.12]) transplant recipients. Cancer patients with prior transplantation had a 1.47-fold increased cancer mortality risk (HR 1.47 [95 % CI: 1.29–1.68]) than those without. East Asia female transplant recipients exhibited higher mortality risks from breast, ovarian, cervix and uterus cancers than those from other regions (SMR 3.13 [95 % CI: 1.93–5.07] vs. 1.16 [95 % CI: 0.88–1.53], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Solid organ transplant recipients face significantly higher cancer mortality risks than the general population, highlighting the need for targeted cancer screening and interventions, especially for female solid organ transplant recipients from East Asia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20339,"journal":{"name":"Preventive medicine","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 108161"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743524003165","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the cancer mortality risk among solid organ transplant recipients through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed (starting from 1965), ISI Web of Science (starting from 1900), MEDLINE (starting from 1976), and Scopus (starting from 1968) from the inception of each database until July 15, 2024. Studies published in English reporting at least one type of cancer mortality risk among recipients of any type of solid organ transplantation were included. The main outcomes were the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) for cancer mortality in transplant recipients compared to the general population, and the hazard ratio (HR) for cancer mortality in transplant recipients versus cancer patients without prior transplantation.

Results

Solid organ transplant recipients had a 2.06-fold increased cancer mortality risk (SMR, 2.06 [95 % CI, 1.56–2.71]) than the general population. Risks were higher in kidney (SMR 1.92 [95 % CI: 1.30–2.84]), liver (SMR 3.07 [95 % CI: 1.80–5.24]), and lung/heart (SMR 4.87 [95 % CI: 3.33–7.12]) transplant recipients. Cancer patients with prior transplantation had a 1.47-fold increased cancer mortality risk (HR 1.47 [95 % CI: 1.29–1.68]) than those without. East Asia female transplant recipients exhibited higher mortality risks from breast, ovarian, cervix and uterus cancers than those from other regions (SMR 3.13 [95 % CI: 1.93–5.07] vs. 1.16 [95 % CI: 0.88–1.53], P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Solid organ transplant recipients face significantly higher cancer mortality risks than the general population, highlighting the need for targeted cancer screening and interventions, especially for female solid organ transplant recipients from East Asia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实体器官移植受者的癌症死亡率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:通过系统回顾和荟萃分析评估实体器官移植受者的癌症死亡风险:通过系统综述和荟萃分析评估实体器官移植受者的癌症死亡风险:在PubMed(始于1965年)、ISI Web of Science(始于1900年)、MEDLINE(始于1976年)和Scopus(始于1968年)数据库中进行系统检索,检索时间从各数据库建立之初至2024年7月15日。纳入的研究以英文发表,报告了任何类型实体器官移植受者中至少一种癌症的死亡风险。主要结果是移植受者与普通人群癌症死亡率的标准化死亡率(SMR),以及移植受者与未接受过移植的癌症患者癌症死亡率的危险比(HR):与普通人群相比,实体器官移植受者的癌症死亡风险增加了 2.06 倍(SMR,2.06 [95 % CI,1.56-2.71])。肾脏(SMR:1.92 [95 % CI:1.30-2.84])、肝脏(SMR:3.07 [95 % CI:1.80-5.24])和肺/心脏(SMR:4.87 [95 % CI:3.33-7.12])移植受者的风险更高。曾接受移植手术的癌症患者的癌症死亡风险(HR 1.47 [95 % CI:1.29-1.68])比未接受移植手术的患者高出 1.47 倍。东亚女性移植受者患乳腺癌、卵巢癌、宫颈癌和子宫癌的死亡风险高于其他地区(SMR 3.13 [95 % CI: 1.93-5.07] vs. 1.16 [95 % CI: 0.88-1.53], P 结论:东亚女性移植受者患乳腺癌、卵巢癌、宫颈癌和子宫癌的死亡风险高于其他地区:实体器官移植受者面临的癌症死亡风险明显高于普通人群,这凸显了进行有针对性的癌症筛查和干预的必要性,尤其是对东亚女性实体器官移植受者而言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Preventive medicine
Preventive medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1972 by Ernst Wynder, Preventive Medicine is an international scholarly journal that provides prompt publication of original articles on the science and practice of disease prevention, health promotion, and public health policymaking. Preventive Medicine aims to reward innovation. It will favor insightful observational studies, thoughtful explorations of health data, unsuspected new angles for existing hypotheses, robust randomized controlled trials, and impartial systematic reviews. Preventive Medicine''s ultimate goal is to publish research that will have an impact on the work of practitioners of disease prevention and health promotion, as well as of related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Firearm possession among emergency department youth and young adults: A latent class analysis. Health-related social needs screening, reporting, and assistance in a large health system. Heart failure and cardiomyopathy mortality trends and disparities among obese populations: A 20-year United States study Comparative effectiveness of high-efficacy and moderate efficacy disease-modifying agents in reducing the annualized relapse rates among multiple sclerosis patients in the United States Sex-specific associations of cigarettes and E-cigarettes use with self-reported premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease among adults aged 18-54 in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1