A comparison of eight weakly dispersive Boussinesq-type models for non-breaking long-wave propagation in variable water depth

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Coastal Engineering Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2024.104645
Guillaume Coulaud , Maria Teles , Michel Benoit
{"title":"A comparison of eight weakly dispersive Boussinesq-type models for non-breaking long-wave propagation in variable water depth","authors":"Guillaume Coulaud ,&nbsp;Maria Teles ,&nbsp;Michel Benoit","doi":"10.1016/j.coastaleng.2024.104645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Weakly dispersive Boussinesq-type models are extensively used to model long-wave propagation in coastal areas and their interaction with coastal infrastructures. Many equations falling in this category have been formulated during the last decades, but few detailed comparisons between them can be found in the literature. In this work, we investigate theoretically and with computational experiments eight variants of the most popular models used by the coastal engineering community. Both weakly nonlinear and fully nonlinear models are considered, hoping to understand better when the additional complexity of the latter class of models is necessary or justified. We provide an overview and discuss the properties of these models, including the linear dispersion relation in uniform water depth, the second-order nonlinear coupling coefficient, the shoaling gradient, and the sensitivity to wave trough instabilities. The models are then numerically discretised using the same general strategy in a single numerical code, using fourth-order methods for time and space discretisation. Their capacity to simulate coastal wave propagation and their transformation when approaching the shore is assessed on three challenging one-dimensional benchmarks. It appears that fully nonlinear models are more consistent than their weakly nonlinear counterparts, which can occasionally perform better but show different behaviours depending on the case.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50996,"journal":{"name":"Coastal Engineering","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 104645"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coastal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378383924001935","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Weakly dispersive Boussinesq-type models are extensively used to model long-wave propagation in coastal areas and their interaction with coastal infrastructures. Many equations falling in this category have been formulated during the last decades, but few detailed comparisons between them can be found in the literature. In this work, we investigate theoretically and with computational experiments eight variants of the most popular models used by the coastal engineering community. Both weakly nonlinear and fully nonlinear models are considered, hoping to understand better when the additional complexity of the latter class of models is necessary or justified. We provide an overview and discuss the properties of these models, including the linear dispersion relation in uniform water depth, the second-order nonlinear coupling coefficient, the shoaling gradient, and the sensitivity to wave trough instabilities. The models are then numerically discretised using the same general strategy in a single numerical code, using fourth-order methods for time and space discretisation. Their capacity to simulate coastal wave propagation and their transformation when approaching the shore is assessed on three challenging one-dimensional benchmarks. It appears that fully nonlinear models are more consistent than their weakly nonlinear counterparts, which can occasionally perform better but show different behaviours depending on the case.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
变水深非断裂长波传播的八种弱色散布森斯克模型比较
弱色散布森斯克模型被广泛用于模拟长波在沿岸地区的传播及其与沿岸基础设施 的相互作用。在过去的几十年中,已经提出了许多属于这一类的方程,但在文献中很少能找到它们之间的详细比较。在这项工作中,我们从理论上并通过计算实验研究了沿岸工程界最常用模型的八个变体。我们考虑了弱非线性和全非线性模型,希望能更好地理解后一类模型的额外复杂性是 必要的或合理的。我们概述并讨论了这些模型的特性,包括均匀水深下的线性弥散关系、二阶非线性耦合 系数、滩涂梯度以及对波谷不稳定性的敏感性。然后,在单个数值代码中采用相同的一般策略对模型进行数值离散化,使用四阶方法进行时间和空间离散化。在三个具有挑战性的一维基准上,评估了它们模拟沿岸波浪传播及其接近海岸时的变 化的能力。与弱非线性模型相比,全非线性模型的一致性更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Coastal Engineering
Coastal Engineering 工程技术-工程:大洋
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Coastal Engineering is an international medium for coastal engineers and scientists. Combining practical applications with modern technological and scientific approaches, such as mathematical and numerical modelling, laboratory and field observations and experiments, it publishes fundamental studies as well as case studies on the following aspects of coastal, harbour and offshore engineering: waves, currents and sediment transport; coastal, estuarine and offshore morphology; technical and functional design of coastal and harbour structures; morphological and environmental impact of coastal, harbour and offshore structures.
期刊最新文献
Experimental study on tsunami-driven debris damming loads on columns of an elevated coastal structure A probabilistic coral rubble mechanical instability model applied with field observations from the Great Barrier reef Numerical modelling of pump-driven tsunami generation and fluid-structure-interaction in idealized urbanized coastal areas during run-up Energy balance during Bragg wave resonance by submerged porous breakwaters through a mixture theory-based δ-LES-SPH model Experimental investigation on cross-shore profile evolution of reef-fronted beach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1