What differentiates the choice of certain foods? An exploratory analysis of food choice patterns among couples from the dyadic NutriAct Family Cohort in relation to social and health-associated determinants

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105354
{"title":"What differentiates the choice of certain foods? An exploratory analysis of food choice patterns among couples from the dyadic NutriAct Family Cohort in relation to social and health-associated determinants","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Food choices determine the intake of nutrients and energy for bodily processes and play a vital role for the health and wellbeing of individuals. However, the choice of what and how an individual eats is shaped largely by socialisation within the family of origin as well as later socialisation contexts, e.g., through biographical transitions or romantic relationships. Nonetheless, food choices have been analysed primarily as largely individualised practices. We performed principal component analyses on self-reported data on food consumption from 803 individuals (<em>M</em> = 64 years old; 50 % female) nested in 402 couples recruited within the NutriAct Family Study to explore food choice patterns. We exploratively derived four distinct patterns representing (1) plant-based, (2) processed animal-based, (3) low-fat, and (4) high-sugar sweet tooth food choices, which were loosely correlated (0.04 ≤ |<em>r</em>| ≤ 0.16). On an inter-couple level we found gender differences with men adhering more to the processed animal-based diet (<em>t</em>(756) = 10.17, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>d</em> = 0.72) and women more to the plant-based (<em>t</em>(800) = −3.70, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>d</em> = −0.26) and low-fat patterns (<em>t</em>(800) = −2.65, <em>p</em> = 0.008, <em>d</em> = −0.19). Additionally, as the number of retirees within a couple increased, so did the similarity between the partners in their overall food choice (<em>F</em>(2799) = 8.15, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>η</em> = 0.02). The couple level explained more variance in the food choice patterns than the individual level across all four patterns (0.62 ≤ ICC1 ≤ 0.78). We thus conclude that socialisation in couples plays a central role in shaping food choices, more so than prevalent gender roles or individual practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324002568","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food choices determine the intake of nutrients and energy for bodily processes and play a vital role for the health and wellbeing of individuals. However, the choice of what and how an individual eats is shaped largely by socialisation within the family of origin as well as later socialisation contexts, e.g., through biographical transitions or romantic relationships. Nonetheless, food choices have been analysed primarily as largely individualised practices. We performed principal component analyses on self-reported data on food consumption from 803 individuals (M = 64 years old; 50 % female) nested in 402 couples recruited within the NutriAct Family Study to explore food choice patterns. We exploratively derived four distinct patterns representing (1) plant-based, (2) processed animal-based, (3) low-fat, and (4) high-sugar sweet tooth food choices, which were loosely correlated (0.04 ≤ |r| ≤ 0.16). On an inter-couple level we found gender differences with men adhering more to the processed animal-based diet (t(756) = 10.17, p < 0.001, d = 0.72) and women more to the plant-based (t(800) = −3.70, p < 0.001, d = −0.26) and low-fat patterns (t(800) = −2.65, p = 0.008, d = −0.19). Additionally, as the number of retirees within a couple increased, so did the similarity between the partners in their overall food choice (F(2799) = 8.15, p < 0.001, η = 0.02). The couple level explained more variance in the food choice patterns than the individual level across all four patterns (0.62 ≤ ICC1 ≤ 0.78). We thus conclude that socialisation in couples plays a central role in shaping food choices, more so than prevalent gender roles or individual practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
某些食物的选择有何不同?从与社会和健康相关的决定因素入手,探索性分析 "营养行动家庭队列 "中夫妻的食物选择模式
食物的选择决定了身体过程所需的营养和能量的摄入,对个人的健康和福祉起着至关重要的作用。然而,一个人选择吃什么和怎么吃,在很大程度上是由原生家庭的社会化以及后来的社会化背景(例如,通过传记过渡或恋爱关系)形成的。尽管如此,食物选择在很大程度上还是作为个体化行为进行分析的。我们对 "营养行动家庭研究"(NutriAct Family Study)中招募的 402 对夫妇中的 803 个个体(男 = 64 岁;50% 为女性)自我报告的食物消费数据进行了主成分分析,以探索食物选择模式。我们探索性地得出了四种不同的食物选择模式,分别代表(1)植物性食物;(2)加工动物性食物;(3)低脂肪食物;(4)高糖甜食,它们之间存在松散的相关性(0.04 ≤ |r| ≤ 0.16)。在夫妇间层面,我们发现了性别差异,男性更倾向于动物性加工食品(t(756) = 10.17, p < 0.001, d = 0.72),女性更倾向于植物性加工食品(t(800) = -3.70, p < 0.001, d = -0.26)和低脂肪饮食(t(800) = -2.65, p = 0.008, d = -0.19)。此外,随着一对夫妇中退休人员数量的增加,他们在总体食物选择上的相似性也在增加(F(2799) = 8.15, p < 0.001, η = 0.02)。在所有四种食物选择模式中,夫妻层面对食物选择模式变异的解释均高于个体层面(0.62 ≤ ICC1 ≤ 0.78)。因此,我们得出结论,夫妻间的社会化在塑造食物选择方面发挥着核心作用,比普遍的性别角色或个人习惯更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
What differentiates the choice of certain foods? An exploratory analysis of food choice patterns among couples from the dyadic NutriAct Family Cohort in relation to social and health-associated determinants Parental norms and attitudes in Relation to Children’s sugar consumption − A mediation analysis of the “Are You Too Sweet?” intervention study Impact of olfactory priming on mental representations of food concepts and subsequent food choice Animal welfare has priority: Swiss consumers’ preferences for animal welfare, greenhouse gas reductions and other sustainability improvements in dairy products Can children and artificial intelligence be sources of ideas for school meal preparations based on whole food utilization?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1