Enhancing Dental Education: Impact of Remote Teaching on Dental Students' Academic Performance in Orthodontics-A Pilot Study.

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development Pub Date : 2024-11-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23821205241293488
Heidi Arponen, David P Rice, Emma Juuri
{"title":"Enhancing Dental Education: Impact of Remote Teaching on Dental Students' Academic Performance in Orthodontics-A Pilot Study.","authors":"Heidi Arponen, David P Rice, Emma Juuri","doi":"10.1177/23821205241293488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Remote teaching strategies have been widely adapted in recent years but their impact on dental students' learning outcomes is less well understood. The aim of this mixed-method pilot study was to examine the impact of remote teaching on undergraduate dental student's learning outcome as assessed by examination performance and student feedback in an orthodontics course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Out of the lectures (19 in total), 10 were delivered remotely (live online lecture or video recording) and 9 as traditional classroom teaching in 2023. The course examination, completed by 47 of the 48 course participants, consisted of 38 single best answer multiple choice questions with 2 questions dedicated to each lecture topic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average lecture attendance was 83% of the students enrolled in the course. Statistical analysis revealed no significant association between examination scores and the mode of teaching or the mandatory nature of the lecture (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i>  = -0.022, <i>p</i> = .897 and <i>r<sub>s</sub></i>  = -0.048, <i>p</i> = .773, respectively). However, individual students' examination scores correlated positively with the frequency of lecture attendance (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i>  = 0.416, <i>p</i> = .004). Students' preferences were in favor of blended learning approach, although notable individual differences in opinions were observed in the feedback received.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study support the hypothesis that remote teaching generates an equally good learning outcome in orthodontics as classroom lectures, as reflected by examination performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"11 ","pages":"23821205241293488"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533226/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241293488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Remote teaching strategies have been widely adapted in recent years but their impact on dental students' learning outcomes is less well understood. The aim of this mixed-method pilot study was to examine the impact of remote teaching on undergraduate dental student's learning outcome as assessed by examination performance and student feedback in an orthodontics course.

Methods: Out of the lectures (19 in total), 10 were delivered remotely (live online lecture or video recording) and 9 as traditional classroom teaching in 2023. The course examination, completed by 47 of the 48 course participants, consisted of 38 single best answer multiple choice questions with 2 questions dedicated to each lecture topic.

Results: The average lecture attendance was 83% of the students enrolled in the course. Statistical analysis revealed no significant association between examination scores and the mode of teaching or the mandatory nature of the lecture (rs  = -0.022, p = .897 and rs  = -0.048, p = .773, respectively). However, individual students' examination scores correlated positively with the frequency of lecture attendance (rs  = 0.416, p = .004). Students' preferences were in favor of blended learning approach, although notable individual differences in opinions were observed in the feedback received.

Conclusion: The findings of this study support the hypothesis that remote teaching generates an equally good learning outcome in orthodontics as classroom lectures, as reflected by examination performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强口腔医学教育:远程教学对口腔正畸专业学生学习成绩的影响--一项试点研究。
目的:近年来,远程教学策略已被广泛采用,但其对牙科学生学习效果的影响却不甚了解。这项混合方法试点研究旨在考察远程教学对口腔正畸学课程中通过考试成绩和学生反馈评估的本科生学习成果的影响:在 2023 年进行的授课(共 19 次)中,10 次为远程授课(在线直播授课或视频录制),9 次为传统课堂教学。48 名学员中有 47 人完成了课程考试,考试由 38 道单项最佳答案选择题组成,每个讲座主题有 2 道题:结果:选课学生的平均听课率为 83%。统计分析显示,考试成绩与教学模式或讲座的强制性之间没有明显联系(rs = -0.022,p = .897;rs = -0.048,p = .773)。然而,学生的考试成绩与听课次数呈正相关(rs = 0.416,p = 0.004)。尽管在收到的反馈意见中观察到了明显的个体差异,但学生们更倾向于混合式学习方法:本研究的结果支持远程教学在口腔正畸学中能产生与课堂讲授同样好的学习效果的假设,考试成绩也反映了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Engagement in Extracurricular Activities During Medical School: A Cross-Sectional Study on Student Motivations and Challenges. Student Critical Self-Reflection and Perceptions of Video-Based Pro-Section Computer-Assisted Instruction. Does Medical Education Require Radical Change? The Role of Information Visualisation and Anecdotal Evidence in Medical Students' Clinical Reasoning Process: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study. Knowledge, Attitude, and Perceived Barriers of Undergraduate Medical Students Towards Research. A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire-Based Study in Morocco.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1