A Multimodal Deep Learning Nomogram for the Identification of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gray-Zone PSA Levels: Comparison with Clinical and Radiomics Models

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.009
Tong Chen , Wei Hu , Yueyue Zhang , Chaogang Wei , Wenlu Zhao , Xiaohong Shen , Caiyuan Zhang , Junkang Shen
{"title":"A Multimodal Deep Learning Nomogram for the Identification of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gray-Zone PSA Levels: Comparison with Clinical and Radiomics Models","authors":"Tong Chen ,&nbsp;Wei Hu ,&nbsp;Yueyue Zhang ,&nbsp;Chaogang Wei ,&nbsp;Wenlu Zhao ,&nbsp;Xiaohong Shen ,&nbsp;Caiyuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Junkang Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>To establish a multimodal deep learning nomogram for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with gray-zone PSA levels.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study enrolled 303 patients with pathological results between January 2018 and December 2022. Clinical variables and the PI-RADS v2.1 score were used to construct a clinical model. Radiomics and deep learning features from bp-MRI were used to develop a radiomics model with SVM and a deep learning model, respectively. A hybrid fusion approach was used to integrate the multimodal data and construct combined models (Comb.Rad.model and Comb.DL.model). The robustness of the radiomics model with XGBoost was validated and compared. Model efficacy was assessed through ROC curve and decision curve analysis. A nomogram was developed based on the best-performing model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The clinical model had AUCs of 0.845 and 0.779 in the training and testing set. The radiomics model with SVM and the deep learning model achieved AUCs of 0.825 and 0.933 in the training set and 0.811 and 0.907 in the testing set, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the combined models was significantly improved, with Comb.DL.model having a higher AUC than Comb.Rad.model in both the training (0.986 vs. 0.924, P = 0.008) and testing (0.965 vs. 0.859, P = 0.005) set. The diagnostic efficiency of both the radiomics model and Comb.Rad.model with XGBoost were comparable to that of SVM, confirming the robustness of the established model.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The integrated nomogram combining deep learning features, PI-RADS score, and clinical variables significantly outperformed the traditional radiomics and clinical models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"32 2","pages":"Pages 864-876"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633224007700","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives

To establish a multimodal deep learning nomogram for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with gray-zone PSA levels.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 303 patients with pathological results between January 2018 and December 2022. Clinical variables and the PI-RADS v2.1 score were used to construct a clinical model. Radiomics and deep learning features from bp-MRI were used to develop a radiomics model with SVM and a deep learning model, respectively. A hybrid fusion approach was used to integrate the multimodal data and construct combined models (Comb.Rad.model and Comb.DL.model). The robustness of the radiomics model with XGBoost was validated and compared. Model efficacy was assessed through ROC curve and decision curve analysis. A nomogram was developed based on the best-performing model.

Results

The clinical model had AUCs of 0.845 and 0.779 in the training and testing set. The radiomics model with SVM and the deep learning model achieved AUCs of 0.825 and 0.933 in the training set and 0.811 and 0.907 in the testing set, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the combined models was significantly improved, with Comb.DL.model having a higher AUC than Comb.Rad.model in both the training (0.986 vs. 0.924, P = 0.008) and testing (0.965 vs. 0.859, P = 0.005) set. The diagnostic efficiency of both the radiomics model and Comb.Rad.model with XGBoost were comparable to that of SVM, confirming the robustness of the established model.

Conclusion

The integrated nomogram combining deep learning features, PI-RADS score, and clinical variables significantly outperformed the traditional radiomics and clinical models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于识别灰区 PSA 水平患者中具有临床意义的前列腺癌的多模态深度学习提名图:与临床和放射组学模型的比较。
原理与目标建立多模态深度学习提名图,用于预测PSA水平为灰区的患者中具有临床意义的前列腺癌:这项回顾性研究纳入了2018年1月至2022年12月期间有病理结果的303名患者。临床变量和 PI-RADS v2.1 评分用于构建临床模型。来自bp-MRI的放射组学和深度学习特征分别用于开发SVM放射组学模型和深度学习模型。混合融合方法用于整合多模态数据并构建组合模型(Comb.Rad.model 和 Comb.DL.model)。利用 XGBoost 验证并比较了放射组学模型的稳健性。通过 ROC 曲线和决策曲线分析评估了模型的有效性。根据表现最佳的模型制定了提名图:结果:临床模型在训练集和测试集中的AUC分别为0.845和0.779。采用 SVM 的放射组学模型和深度学习模型在训练集中的 AUC 分别为 0.825 和 0.933,在测试集中的 AUC 分别为 0.811 和 0.907。组合模型的诊断性能显著提高,在训练集(0.986 vs. 0.924,P = 0.008)和测试集(0.965 vs. 0.859,P = 0.005)中,Comb.DL.模型的AUC均高于Comb.Rad.模型。带有 XGBoost 的放射组学模型和 Comb.Rad.model 的诊断效率与 SVM 相当,证实了所建立模型的鲁棒性:结合了深度学习特征、PI-RADS 评分和临床变量的综合提名图明显优于传统的放射组学模型和临床模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Computed tomography radiomics-based combined model for predicting thymoma risk subgroups: a multicenter retrospective study. Deep Learning with Multiphase CTA and CTP Images for Predicting Hemorrhagic Transformation in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients. Predictors of Discoid Morphology in Lateral Meniscal Tears: Introducing a Novel Meniscal Height Ratio. Risk Factors for Disease Progression in Thermal Ablation of Papillary Thyroid Cancer-A Large-sample Analysis. CT-Based Deep Learning Predicts Prognosis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer Patients Receiving Immunotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1