Category-Sensitive Age-Related Shifts Between Prosodic and Semantic Dominance in Emotion Perception Linked to Cognitive Capacities.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00817
Yi Lin, Xiaoqing Ye, Huaiyi Zhang, Fei Xu, Jingyu Zhang, Hongwei Ding, Yang Zhang
{"title":"Category-Sensitive Age-Related Shifts Between Prosodic and Semantic Dominance in Emotion Perception Linked to Cognitive Capacities.","authors":"Yi Lin, Xiaoqing Ye, Huaiyi Zhang, Fei Xu, Jingyu Zhang, Hongwei Ding, Yang Zhang","doi":"10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prior research extensively documented challenges in recognizing verbal and nonverbal emotion among older individuals when compared with younger counterparts. However, the nature of these age-related changes remains unclear. The present study investigated how older and younger adults comprehend four basic emotions (i.e., anger, happiness, neutrality, and sadness) conveyed through verbal (semantic) and nonverbal (facial and prosodic) channels.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 73 older adults (43 women, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 70.18 years) and 74 younger adults (37 women, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 22.01 years) partook in a fixed-choice test for recognizing emotions presented visually via facial expressions or auditorily through prosody or semantics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results confirmed age-related decline in recognizing emotions across all channels except for identifying happy facial expressions. Furthermore, the two age groups demonstrated both commonalities and disparities in their inclinations toward specific channels. While both groups displayed a shared dominance of visual facial cues over auditory emotional signals, older adults indicated a preference for semantics, whereas younger adults displayed a preference for prosody in auditory emotion perception. Notably, the dominance effects observed in older adults for visual and semantic cues were less pronounced for sadness and anger compared to other emotions. These challenges in emotion recognition and the shifts in channel preferences among older adults were correlated with their general cognitive capabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Together, the findings underscore that age-related obstacles in perceiving emotions and alterations in channel dominance, which vary by emotional category, are significantly intertwined with overall cognitive functioning.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27307251.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00817","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Prior research extensively documented challenges in recognizing verbal and nonverbal emotion among older individuals when compared with younger counterparts. However, the nature of these age-related changes remains unclear. The present study investigated how older and younger adults comprehend four basic emotions (i.e., anger, happiness, neutrality, and sadness) conveyed through verbal (semantic) and nonverbal (facial and prosodic) channels.

Method: A total of 73 older adults (43 women, Mage = 70.18 years) and 74 younger adults (37 women, Mage = 22.01 years) partook in a fixed-choice test for recognizing emotions presented visually via facial expressions or auditorily through prosody or semantics.

Results: The results confirmed age-related decline in recognizing emotions across all channels except for identifying happy facial expressions. Furthermore, the two age groups demonstrated both commonalities and disparities in their inclinations toward specific channels. While both groups displayed a shared dominance of visual facial cues over auditory emotional signals, older adults indicated a preference for semantics, whereas younger adults displayed a preference for prosody in auditory emotion perception. Notably, the dominance effects observed in older adults for visual and semantic cues were less pronounced for sadness and anger compared to other emotions. These challenges in emotion recognition and the shifts in channel preferences among older adults were correlated with their general cognitive capabilities.

Conclusion: Together, the findings underscore that age-related obstacles in perceiving emotions and alterations in channel dominance, which vary by emotional category, are significantly intertwined with overall cognitive functioning.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27307251.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与认知能力相关的情绪感知中前奏和语义优势之间的类别敏感性年龄迁移
目的:先前的研究广泛记录了老年人在识别言语和非言语情绪方面与年轻人相比所面临的挑战。然而,这些与年龄有关的变化的性质仍不清楚。本研究调查了老年人和年轻人如何理解通过语言(语义)和非语言(面部和拟声)渠道传达的四种基本情绪(即愤怒、快乐、中立和悲伤):共有 73 名老年人(43 名女性,平均年龄为 70.18 岁)和 74 名年轻人(37 名女性,平均年龄为 22.01 岁)参加了一项固定选择测试,测试内容为识别通过面部表情视觉呈现的情绪,或通过拟声或语义听觉呈现的情绪:结果证实,除了识别快乐的面部表情外,在所有渠道识别情绪的能力都出现了与年龄相关的下降。此外,两个年龄组在倾向于特定渠道方面既有共同点,也有差异。虽然两个年龄组都显示出视觉面部线索比听觉情绪信号占优势,但在听觉情绪感知方面,老年人显示出对语义的偏好,而年轻人则显示出对拟声的偏好。值得注意的是,与其他情绪相比,在老年人身上观察到的视觉和语义线索的优势效应在悲伤和愤怒时并不明显。老年人在情绪识别方面面临的这些挑战以及在渠道偏好方面的变化与他们的一般认知能力有关:总之,研究结果表明,与年龄有关的情绪感知障碍和渠道主导性的改变(因情绪类别而异)与整体认知功能密切相关。补充材料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27307251。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
19.20%
发文量
538
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.
期刊最新文献
Inferring Word Class and Meaning From Spoken and Written Texts: A Comparison of Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder. Producing Nasal Vowels Without Nasalization? Perceptual Judgments and Acoustic Measurements of Nasal/Oral Vowels Produced by Children With Cochlear Implants and Typically Hearing Peers. Accurately Identifying Language Disorder in School-Age Children Using Dynamic Assessment of Narrative Language. Microbiome and Communication Disorders: A Tutorial for Clinicians. Race Identification in American English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1