Travel behavior before and after COVID-19. A hybrid choice model applied to a panel dataset

Eleonora Sottile, Giovanni Tuveri, Francesco Piras, Italo Meloni
{"title":"Travel behavior before and after COVID-19. A hybrid choice model applied to a panel dataset","authors":"Eleonora Sottile,&nbsp;Giovanni Tuveri,&nbsp;Francesco Piras,&nbsp;Italo Meloni","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2024.101265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>After two decades of psychological research into travel behavior, one would anticipate a thorough understanding of the cognitive processes guiding travel choices. However, the intricate and unpredictable nature of mobility dynamics often obstructs efforts to promote sustainable travel behaviors. While hybrid choice models (HCMs) incorporating latent variables prove invaluable in analyzing travel behavior, there remains a critical need for further exploration into effectively managing these variables. Typically assessed at singular time points, these variables pose challenges in analyzing individual characteristics based on their fluctuations. Moreover, deriving actionable policy implications from HCMs is challenging due to the inherent nature of psycho-attitudinal variables, which exhibit limited responsiveness to alterations in alternatives. Only a significant disruptive event could induce notable shifts in individuals’ psycho-attitudinal characteristics. The objective of this paper is to investigate two aspects: i) to study if and how norms, intentions and perceived behavioral control change after a strong shock such as the pandemic, and ii) to analyze the differences in the HCMs results estimated by using data collected before and after the shock. The study involves a panel dataset gathered during a VTBC Program which involved three phases, two of which before and straight after the first lockdown. Our results show that norms were less impacted by COVID-19 and lost importance post-lockdown. There was a notable decline in the intention to use sustainable modes and an increase in car usage, with significant differences in perceived behavioral control between those who maintain and those who change their transport modes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 101265"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198224002513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After two decades of psychological research into travel behavior, one would anticipate a thorough understanding of the cognitive processes guiding travel choices. However, the intricate and unpredictable nature of mobility dynamics often obstructs efforts to promote sustainable travel behaviors. While hybrid choice models (HCMs) incorporating latent variables prove invaluable in analyzing travel behavior, there remains a critical need for further exploration into effectively managing these variables. Typically assessed at singular time points, these variables pose challenges in analyzing individual characteristics based on their fluctuations. Moreover, deriving actionable policy implications from HCMs is challenging due to the inherent nature of psycho-attitudinal variables, which exhibit limited responsiveness to alterations in alternatives. Only a significant disruptive event could induce notable shifts in individuals’ psycho-attitudinal characteristics. The objective of this paper is to investigate two aspects: i) to study if and how norms, intentions and perceived behavioral control change after a strong shock such as the pandemic, and ii) to analyze the differences in the HCMs results estimated by using data collected before and after the shock. The study involves a panel dataset gathered during a VTBC Program which involved three phases, two of which before and straight after the first lockdown. Our results show that norms were less impacted by COVID-19 and lost importance post-lockdown. There was a notable decline in the intention to use sustainable modes and an increase in car usage, with significant differences in perceived behavioral control between those who maintain and those who change their transport modes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 前后的旅行行为。应用于面板数据集的混合选择模型
经过二十年对出行行为的心理学研究,人们应该对指导出行选择的认知过程有了透彻的了解。然而,交通动态的复杂性和不可预测性往往阻碍了促进可持续出行行为的努力。虽然包含潜在变量的混合选择模型(HCMs)在分析出行行为方面证明是非常有价值的,但仍亟需进一步探索如何有效管理这些变量。这些变量通常在单个时间点进行评估,因此在分析基于其波动的个体特征时面临挑战。此外,由于心理纵向变量的固有特性,它们对替代品变化的反应有限,因此从 HCMs 中得出可操作的政策含义具有挑战性。只有重大的破坏性事件才能引起个人心理态度特征的显著变化。本文旨在研究两个方面:i) 研究规范、意向和感知行为控制在大流行病等强烈冲击后是否以及如何发生变化;ii) 分析使用冲击前后收集的数据估计的 HCMs 结果的差异。研究涉及在 VTBC 计划期间收集的面板数据集,该计划包括三个阶段,其中两个阶段是在第一次封锁之前,另一个阶段是在第一次封锁之后。我们的研究结果表明,规范受 COVID-19 的影响较小,在封锁后失去了重要性。使用可持续交通方式的意向明显下降,而使用汽车的意向则有所上升,维持和改变交通方式的人在感知行为控制方面存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Electric mobility investment in the power and transport sector coupling context: Lessons from Argentina, the Philippines, Poland and Romania Comparative Analysis of barriers to Battery electric vehicle adoption between BEV and ICE Users: A case study of Thailand Disparities in ridehailing travel times for accessing non-work destinations Optimal bus reassignment considering in-vehicle overcrowding Drones for automated parcel delivery: Use case identification and derivation of technical requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1