Delay discounting in adolescence depends on whom you wait for: Evidence from a functional neuroimaging study

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101463
Lotte H. van Rijn , Suzanne van de Groep , Michelle Achterberg , Lara Wierenga , Barbara R. Braams , Valeria Gazzola , Berna Güroğlu , Christian Keysers , Lucres Nauta-Jansen , Anna van Duijvenvoorde , Lydia Krabbendam , Eveline A. Crone
{"title":"Delay discounting in adolescence depends on whom you wait for: Evidence from a functional neuroimaging study","authors":"Lotte H. van Rijn ,&nbsp;Suzanne van de Groep ,&nbsp;Michelle Achterberg ,&nbsp;Lara Wierenga ,&nbsp;Barbara R. Braams ,&nbsp;Valeria Gazzola ,&nbsp;Berna Güroğlu ,&nbsp;Christian Keysers ,&nbsp;Lucres Nauta-Jansen ,&nbsp;Anna van Duijvenvoorde ,&nbsp;Lydia Krabbendam ,&nbsp;Eveline A. Crone","doi":"10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With age, adolescents increasingly demonstrate the ability to forgo immediate, smaller rewards in favor of larger delayed rewards, indicating reduced delay discounting. Adolescence is also a time of social reorientation, where decisions not only involve weighing immediate against future outcomes, but also consequences for self versus those for others. In this functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging study, we examined the neural correlates of immediate and delayed reward choices where the delayed outcomes could benefit self, friends, or unknown others. A total of 196 adolescent twins aged 14–17 completed a social delay discounting task, with fMRI data acquired from 174 participants. Out of these, 156 adolescents had valid fMRI data, and 138 adolescents had observations in every condition. Adolescents more often chose the immediate reward when it was larger, and when the delay was longer. Area-under-the-curve (AUC) comparisons revealed that behavior differed across delay-beneficiaries, with AUC being highest for the self, followed by friends, and lowest for unknown others. This suggests that adolescents are more willing to wait for rewards for self. Neuroimaging analyses showed increased activity in the midline areas medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) and precuneus, as well as bilateral temporal parietal junction (TPJ) when considering delayed reward for unknown others and friends compared to self. A whole-brain interaction with choice showed that the bilateral insula and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) were more active for delayed choices for unknown others and for immediate choices for friends and self. This underscores that the neuro-cognitive processing of how delays reduce the value of rewards depends on closeness of the beneficiary.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49083,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101463"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929324001245","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With age, adolescents increasingly demonstrate the ability to forgo immediate, smaller rewards in favor of larger delayed rewards, indicating reduced delay discounting. Adolescence is also a time of social reorientation, where decisions not only involve weighing immediate against future outcomes, but also consequences for self versus those for others. In this functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging study, we examined the neural correlates of immediate and delayed reward choices where the delayed outcomes could benefit self, friends, or unknown others. A total of 196 adolescent twins aged 14–17 completed a social delay discounting task, with fMRI data acquired from 174 participants. Out of these, 156 adolescents had valid fMRI data, and 138 adolescents had observations in every condition. Adolescents more often chose the immediate reward when it was larger, and when the delay was longer. Area-under-the-curve (AUC) comparisons revealed that behavior differed across delay-beneficiaries, with AUC being highest for the self, followed by friends, and lowest for unknown others. This suggests that adolescents are more willing to wait for rewards for self. Neuroimaging analyses showed increased activity in the midline areas medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) and precuneus, as well as bilateral temporal parietal junction (TPJ) when considering delayed reward for unknown others and friends compared to self. A whole-brain interaction with choice showed that the bilateral insula and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) were more active for delayed choices for unknown others and for immediate choices for friends and self. This underscores that the neuro-cognitive processing of how delays reduce the value of rewards depends on closeness of the beneficiary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青春期的延迟折现取决于你在等谁?功能神经影像学研究的证据
随着年龄的增长,青少年越来越多地表现出能够放弃即时的、较小的回报,而选择较大的延迟回报,这表明延迟折现减少了。青春期也是社会重新定位的时期,在这个时期做出的决定不仅要权衡眼前和未来的结果,还要权衡对自己和对他人的后果。在这项功能磁共振成像研究中,我们考察了在延迟结果可能使自己、朋友或未知他人受益的情况下,即时和延迟奖励选择的神经相关性。共有 196 名 14-17 岁的青少年双胞胎完成了社交延迟折扣任务,其中 174 人获得了 fMRI 数据。其中,156 名青少年获得了有效的 fMRI 数据,138 名青少年在每个条件下都进行了观察。当即时奖励较大和延迟时间较长时,青少年更常选择即时奖励。曲线下面积(AUC)比较显示,不同延迟受益者的行为各不相同,自己的AUC最高,其次是朋友,而未知他人的AUC最低。这表明青少年更愿意为自己等待奖励。神经影像学分析表明,在考虑对未知他人和朋友的延迟奖励时,中线区域内侧前额叶皮层(MPFC)和楔前区以及双侧颞顶叶交界处(TPJ)的活动比考虑对自己的延迟奖励时有所增加。与选择有关的全脑交互作用显示,双侧脑岛和右侧背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)在对未知他人的延迟选择以及对朋友和自己的即时选择中更为活跃。这突出表明,神经认知对延迟如何降低奖励价值的处理取决于受益人的亲密程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.60%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes theoretical and research papers on cognitive brain development, from infancy through childhood and adolescence and into adulthood. It covers neurocognitive development and neurocognitive processing in both typical and atypical development, including social and affective aspects. Appropriate methodologies for the journal include, but are not limited to, functional neuroimaging (fMRI and MEG), electrophysiology (EEG and ERP), NIRS and transcranial magnetic stimulation, as well as other basic neuroscience approaches using cellular and animal models that directly address cognitive brain development, patient studies, case studies, post-mortem studies and pharmacological studies.
期刊最新文献
Establishing a model of peer support for pregnant persons with a substance use disorder as an innovative approach for engaging participants in the healthy brain and child development study. Co-developing sleep-wake and sensory foundations for cognition in the human fetus and newborn. State-dependent inter-network functional connectivity development in neonatal brain from the developing human connectome project. How will developmental neuroimaging contribute to the prediction of neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders? Challenges and opportunities. Harmonizing multisite neonatal diffusion-weighted brain MRI data for developmental neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1