On the legality of national carbon pricing instruments alongside the new EU ETS 2

Jana Viktoria Nysten
{"title":"On the legality of national carbon pricing instruments alongside the new EU ETS 2","authors":"Jana Viktoria Nysten","doi":"10.1038/s44168-024-00174-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the EU ETS 2 a new EU-wide emissions trading system is introduced that covers the greenhouse gas emission of the buildings and road transport sectors, i.e. sectors the decarbonization of which has so far been the responsibility of the Member States under the Effort Sharing Regulation. Since they will remain responsible for the achievement of their national greenhouse gas emission reduction targets under that regime, the question arises whether the Member States can maintain or introduce additional carbon pricing instruments alongside the new EU ETS 2. Hence, this paper examines the legality of such an approach, by assessing relevant provisions of EU secondary and primary law. Without going deep into the economic and political considerations, it concludes that from a legal perspective, the coexistence of national carbon pricing instruments and the EU ETS 2 is not prohibited. With the latest reform of the EU Emissions Trading System Directive (ETS Directive), the European Union (EU) has introduced a new EU emissions trading system for buildings and road transport (EU ETS 2)1. The decarbonization of those sectors traditionally falls within the responsibility of the EU Member States under the regime of the Effort Sharing Regulation (ESR). The ESR introduces legally binding national greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction targets. Hence, over the last few years, the Member States have introduced different measures in order to reach their targets. Those include carbon pricing instruments, understood as measures that put a price on the emission of GHG and thus create an incentive to reduce those emissions. Carbon pricing instruments include carbon taxes, as well as emissions trading systems2. With the introduction of the new ETS 2, the question arises whether the Member States can maintain (or introduce) such national carbon pricing instruments in parallel to the new EU ETS 2.","PeriodicalId":186004,"journal":{"name":"npj Climate Action","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44168-024-00174-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Climate Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44168-024-00174-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the EU ETS 2 a new EU-wide emissions trading system is introduced that covers the greenhouse gas emission of the buildings and road transport sectors, i.e. sectors the decarbonization of which has so far been the responsibility of the Member States under the Effort Sharing Regulation. Since they will remain responsible for the achievement of their national greenhouse gas emission reduction targets under that regime, the question arises whether the Member States can maintain or introduce additional carbon pricing instruments alongside the new EU ETS 2. Hence, this paper examines the legality of such an approach, by assessing relevant provisions of EU secondary and primary law. Without going deep into the economic and political considerations, it concludes that from a legal perspective, the coexistence of national carbon pricing instruments and the EU ETS 2 is not prohibited. With the latest reform of the EU Emissions Trading System Directive (ETS Directive), the European Union (EU) has introduced a new EU emissions trading system for buildings and road transport (EU ETS 2)1. The decarbonization of those sectors traditionally falls within the responsibility of the EU Member States under the regime of the Effort Sharing Regulation (ESR). The ESR introduces legally binding national greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction targets. Hence, over the last few years, the Member States have introduced different measures in order to reach their targets. Those include carbon pricing instruments, understood as measures that put a price on the emission of GHG and thus create an incentive to reduce those emissions. Carbon pricing instruments include carbon taxes, as well as emissions trading systems2. With the introduction of the new ETS 2, the question arises whether the Member States can maintain (or introduce) such national carbon pricing instruments in parallel to the new EU ETS 2.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于国家碳定价工具与新的欧盟排放交易计划的合法性 2
随着欧盟排放交易计划 2 的推出,一个新的欧盟范围内的排放交易系统被引入,该系统涵盖了建筑和道路运输部门的温室气体排放,即迄今为止根据《努力分担条例》由成员国负责去碳化的部门。由于在该制度下,成员国仍将负责实现本国的温室气体减排目标,因此出现的问题是,在新的欧盟排放交易计划 2 之外,成员国是否可以保留或引入额外的碳定价工具。 因此,本文通过评估欧盟二级法和一级法的相关规定,研究这种方法的合法性。在不深入探讨经济和政治因素的前提下,本文得出结论:从法律角度看,国家碳定价工具与欧盟排放交易计划 2 并存并不被禁止。随着欧盟排放交易体系指令(ETS 指令)的最新改革,欧盟(EU)针对建筑物和道路交通引入了新的欧盟排放交易体系(EU ETS 2)1。根据《努力分担条例》(ESR)的规定,这些部门的去碳化传统上由欧盟成员国负责。该条例引入了具有法律约束力的国家温室气体(GHG)减排目标。因此,在过去几年中,成员国为实现其目标采取了不同的措施。其中包括碳定价工具,即对温室气体排放定价,从而激励减排的措施。碳定价工具包括碳税和排放交易系统2。随着新的欧盟排放交易计划 2 的推出,出现了成员国是否可以在新的欧盟排放交易计划 2 的同时保留(或引入)此类国家碳定价工具的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What, how and where: an assessment of multi-level European climate mitigation policies Applications of generative artificial intelligence to influence climate change decisions Shifting and sharing power in urban climate justice work: experiments in transformative learning in Vancouver, Canada Author Correction: From countercultural ecovillages to mainstream green neighbourhoods—a view on current trends in Denmark Divergence over solutions to adapt or transform Australia’s Great Barrier Reef
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1