Quantitative structure–activity relationships of chemical bioactivity toward proteins associated with molecular initiating events of organ-specific toxicity

IF 7.1 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Cheminformatics Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1186/s13321-024-00917-x
Domenico Gadaleta, Marina Garcia de Lomana, Eva Serrano-Candelas, Rita Ortega-Vallbona, Rafael Gozalbes, Alessandra Roncaglioni, Emilio Benfenati
{"title":"Quantitative structure–activity relationships of chemical bioactivity toward proteins associated with molecular initiating events of organ-specific toxicity","authors":"Domenico Gadaleta,&nbsp;Marina Garcia de Lomana,&nbsp;Eva Serrano-Candelas,&nbsp;Rita Ortega-Vallbona,&nbsp;Rafael Gozalbes,&nbsp;Alessandra Roncaglioni,&nbsp;Emilio Benfenati","doi":"10.1186/s13321-024-00917-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The adverse outcome pathway (AOP) concept has gained attention as a way to explore the mechanism of chemical toxicity. In this study, quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models were developed to predict compound activity toward protein targets relevant to molecular initiating events (MIE) upstream of organ-specific toxicities, namely liver steatosis, cholestasis, nephrotoxicity, neural tube closure defects, and cognitive functional defects. Utilizing bioactivity data from the ChEMBL 33 database, various machine learning algorithms, chemical features and methods to assess prediction reliability were compared and applied to develop robust models to predict compound activity. The results demonstrate high predictive performance across multiple targets, with balanced accuracy exceeding 0.80 for the majority of models. Furthermore, stability checks confirmed the consistency of predictive performance across multiple training-test splits. The results obtained by using QSAR predictions to identify known markers of adversities highlighted the utility of the models for risk assessment and for prioritizing compounds for further experimental evaluation.</p><p><b>Scientific contribution</b></p><p>The work describes the development of QSAR models as tools for screening chemicals with potential systemic toxicity, thus contributing to resource savings and providing indications for further better-targeted testing. This study provides advances in the field of computational modeling of MIEs and information from AOP which is still relatively young and unexplored. The comprehensive modeling procedure is highly generalizable, and offers a robust framework for predicting a wide range of toxicological endpoints.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cheminformatics","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://jcheminf.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13321-024-00917-x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cheminformatics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13321-024-00917-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The adverse outcome pathway (AOP) concept has gained attention as a way to explore the mechanism of chemical toxicity. In this study, quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models were developed to predict compound activity toward protein targets relevant to molecular initiating events (MIE) upstream of organ-specific toxicities, namely liver steatosis, cholestasis, nephrotoxicity, neural tube closure defects, and cognitive functional defects. Utilizing bioactivity data from the ChEMBL 33 database, various machine learning algorithms, chemical features and methods to assess prediction reliability were compared and applied to develop robust models to predict compound activity. The results demonstrate high predictive performance across multiple targets, with balanced accuracy exceeding 0.80 for the majority of models. Furthermore, stability checks confirmed the consistency of predictive performance across multiple training-test splits. The results obtained by using QSAR predictions to identify known markers of adversities highlighted the utility of the models for risk assessment and for prioritizing compounds for further experimental evaluation.

Scientific contribution

The work describes the development of QSAR models as tools for screening chemicals with potential systemic toxicity, thus contributing to resource savings and providing indications for further better-targeted testing. This study provides advances in the field of computational modeling of MIEs and information from AOP which is still relatively young and unexplored. The comprehensive modeling procedure is highly generalizable, and offers a robust framework for predicting a wide range of toxicological endpoints.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与器官特异性毒性分子启动事件相关的蛋白质化学生物活性的定量结构-活性关系
作为探索化学毒性机制的一种方法,不良后果途径(AOP)的概念已受到广泛关注。本研究开发了定量结构-活性关系(QSAR)模型,用于预测化合物对器官特异性毒性(即肝脏脂肪变性、胆汁淤积、肾毒性、神经管闭合缺陷和认知功能缺陷)上游分子起始事件(MIE)相关蛋白质靶点的活性。利用 ChEMBL 33 数据库中的生物活性数据,比较并应用了各种机器学习算法、化学特征和评估预测可靠性的方法,从而开发出预测化合物活性的稳健模型。结果表明,这些模型对多个靶点都具有很高的预测性能,大多数模型的平衡准确度超过了 0.80。此外,稳定性检查证实了预测性能在多个训练-测试分段中的一致性。通过使用 QSAR 预测来识别已知的逆境标志物所获得的结果,凸显了这些模型在风险评估和确定需要进一步实验评估的化合物优先次序方面的实用性。科学贡献 该研究工作介绍了 QSAR 模型的开发情况,将其作为筛选具有潜在系统毒性的化学品的工具,从而有助于节省资源,并为进一步进行更有针对性的测试提供指示。这项研究在 MIEs 计算建模领域取得了进展,并提供了 AOP 的信息,而这一领域还相对年轻,尚未得到探索。综合建模程序具有很强的通用性,为预测各种毒理学终点提供了一个稳健的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cheminformatics
Journal of Cheminformatics CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
7.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Cheminformatics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all aspects of cheminformatics and molecular modelling. Coverage includes, but is not limited to: chemical information systems, software and databases, and molecular modelling, chemical structure representations and their use in structure, substructure, and similarity searching of chemical substance and chemical reaction databases, computer and molecular graphics, computer-aided molecular design, expert systems, QSAR, and data mining techniques.
期刊最新文献
A systematic review of deep learning chemical language models in recent era Accelerated hit identification with target evaluation, deep learning and automated labs: prospective validation in IRAK1 QSPRpred: a Flexible Open-Source Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Modelling Tool Comparative evaluation of methods for the prediction of protein–ligand binding sites Protein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1