Global sensitivity analysis of Open Systems Pharmacology Suite physiologically based pharmacokinetic models.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1002/psp4.13256
Abdulkarim Najjar, Abdullah Hamadeh, Sophia Krause, Andreas Schepky, Andrea Edginton
{"title":"Global sensitivity analysis of Open Systems Pharmacology Suite physiologically based pharmacokinetic models.","authors":"Abdulkarim Najjar, Abdullah Hamadeh, Sophia Krause, Andreas Schepky, Andrea Edginton","doi":"10.1002/psp4.13256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sensitivity analyses are important components of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model development and are required by regulatory agencies for PBPK submissions. They assess the impact of parametric uncertainty and variability on model estimates, aid model optimization by identifying parameters requiring calibration, and enable the testing of assumptions within PBPK models. One-at-a-time (OAT) sensitivity analyses quantify the impact on a model output in response to changes in a single parameter while holding others fixed. Global sensitivity analysis (GSA) methods provide more comprehensive assessments by accounting for changes in all uncertain or variable parameters, though at a higher computational cost. This tutorial article presents a software package for conducting both OAT and GSA of PBPK models built in the Open Systems Pharmacology (OSP) Suite. The tool is accessible through either an R script or a graphical user interface, and the outputs consist of sensitivity metrics of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, such as C<sub>max</sub> and AUC, evaluated with respect to model input parameters. Results are formatted according to regulatory standards. The OAT analysis methods comprise two-way local sensitivity analyses and probabilistic uncertainty analyses, whereas the GSA methods include the Morris, Sobol, and EFAST methods. These analyses can be conducted on single PBPK models or pairs of models for the evaluation of the sensitivity of PK parameter ratios in drug-drug interaction studies. The practical application of the package is demonstrated through three illustrative case studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.13256","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sensitivity analyses are important components of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model development and are required by regulatory agencies for PBPK submissions. They assess the impact of parametric uncertainty and variability on model estimates, aid model optimization by identifying parameters requiring calibration, and enable the testing of assumptions within PBPK models. One-at-a-time (OAT) sensitivity analyses quantify the impact on a model output in response to changes in a single parameter while holding others fixed. Global sensitivity analysis (GSA) methods provide more comprehensive assessments by accounting for changes in all uncertain or variable parameters, though at a higher computational cost. This tutorial article presents a software package for conducting both OAT and GSA of PBPK models built in the Open Systems Pharmacology (OSP) Suite. The tool is accessible through either an R script or a graphical user interface, and the outputs consist of sensitivity metrics of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, such as Cmax and AUC, evaluated with respect to model input parameters. Results are formatted according to regulatory standards. The OAT analysis methods comprise two-way local sensitivity analyses and probabilistic uncertainty analyses, whereas the GSA methods include the Morris, Sobol, and EFAST methods. These analyses can be conducted on single PBPK models or pairs of models for the evaluation of the sensitivity of PK parameter ratios in drug-drug interaction studies. The practical application of the package is demonstrated through three illustrative case studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开放系统药理学套件生理药代动力学模型的全局敏感性分析。
敏感性分析是生理药代动力学(PBPK)模型开发的重要组成部分,也是监管机构要求提交的 PBPK 模型。敏感性分析可评估参数的不确定性和变异性对模型估计值的影响,通过确定需要校准的参数来帮助模型优化,并对 PBPK 模型中的假设进行测试。单次(OAT)敏感性分析量化了在其他参数固定不变的情况下,单个参数的变化对模型输出的影响。全局灵敏度分析 (GSA) 方法通过考虑所有不确定或可变参数的变化来提供更全面的评估,但计算成本较高。本教程文章介绍了一个软件包,用于对开放系统药理学 (OSP) 套件中构建的 PBPK 模型进行 OAT 和 GSA 分析。该工具可通过 R 脚本或图形用户界面访问,其输出包括药代动力学 (PK) 参数(如 Cmax 和 AUC)的灵敏度指标,根据模型输入参数进行评估。结果的格式符合监管标准。OAT 分析方法包括双向局部敏感性分析和概率不确定性分析,而 GSA 方法包括 Morris、Sobol 和 EFAST 方法。这些分析可在单个 PBPK 模型或成对模型上进行,用于评估药物相互作用研究中 PK 参数比率的敏感性。本软件包的实际应用通过三个案例研究进行了演示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.40%
发文量
146
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical study design strategies to mitigate confounding effects of time-dependent clearance on dose optimization of therapeutic antibodies. Exploration of the potential impact of batch-to-batch variability on the establishment of pharmacokinetic bioequivalence for inhalation powder drug products. Population pharmacokinetics of selexipag for dose selection and confirmation in pediatric patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Issue Information Exposure-response modeling of liver fat imaging endpoints in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease populations administered ervogastat alone and co-administered with clesacostat.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1