Postmarketing Assessment of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Proof-of-Concept Using Model-Based Meta-Analysis and a Clinical Utility Index Approach.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1002/psp4.70013
Innocent Gerald Asiimwe, Nour Chtiba, Samer Mouksassi, Goonaseelan Colin Pillai, Raimund M Peter, Eunice Yuen, Venkatesh Pilla Reddy
{"title":"Postmarketing Assessment of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Proof-of-Concept Using Model-Based Meta-Analysis and a Clinical Utility Index Approach.","authors":"Innocent Gerald Asiimwe, Nour Chtiba, Samer Mouksassi, Goonaseelan Colin Pillai, Raimund M Peter, Eunice Yuen, Venkatesh Pilla Reddy","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a promising class of targeted cancer therapies. However, they need careful dose optimization to maximize effectiveness and minimize side effects. Sometimes, safety issues may only become apparent after approval, so ongoing evaluation is important. This study aimed to assess the benefit-risk profiles of two approved trastuzumab-drug conjugates: trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). A systematic search of MEDLINE on May 1, 2024, identified clinical trials reporting the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of T-DM1 and T-DXd. Summary-level data from 103 trials was used along with model-based meta-analysis to develop population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response models for both ADCs. The study combined the objective response rate (ORR) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) into a composite score called the clinical utility index (CUI) to determine optimal drug exposures and doses that maximize the benefit-risk balance. Different ORR/DLT weights and CUI thresholds representing desired minimum effect size were tested in three scenarios (\"only phase I trials,\" \"phase I/II trials,\" and \"all phases\"). Using a CUI threshold of 10%, the approved T-DM1 dose of 3.6 mg/kg for breast cancer was found to align with an efficacy-safety (ORR-DLT) ratio of 81:19 with all phases. Applying these weights to the T-DXd analyses successfully predicted the approved T-DXd dose (5.4 mg/kg, breast cancer), showing a CUI improvement compared to the 3.2 mg/kg dose of 8.3%, 8.2%, and 2.4% in the three respective scenarios. Overall, this proof-of-concept assessment of ADCs can save time and costs for pharmaceutical companies and optimize dosing to maximize patient benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.70013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a promising class of targeted cancer therapies. However, they need careful dose optimization to maximize effectiveness and minimize side effects. Sometimes, safety issues may only become apparent after approval, so ongoing evaluation is important. This study aimed to assess the benefit-risk profiles of two approved trastuzumab-drug conjugates: trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). A systematic search of MEDLINE on May 1, 2024, identified clinical trials reporting the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of T-DM1 and T-DXd. Summary-level data from 103 trials was used along with model-based meta-analysis to develop population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response models for both ADCs. The study combined the objective response rate (ORR) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) into a composite score called the clinical utility index (CUI) to determine optimal drug exposures and doses that maximize the benefit-risk balance. Different ORR/DLT weights and CUI thresholds representing desired minimum effect size were tested in three scenarios ("only phase I trials," "phase I/II trials," and "all phases"). Using a CUI threshold of 10%, the approved T-DM1 dose of 3.6 mg/kg for breast cancer was found to align with an efficacy-safety (ORR-DLT) ratio of 81:19 with all phases. Applying these weights to the T-DXd analyses successfully predicted the approved T-DXd dose (5.4 mg/kg, breast cancer), showing a CUI improvement compared to the 3.2 mg/kg dose of 8.3%, 8.2%, and 2.4% in the three respective scenarios. Overall, this proof-of-concept assessment of ADCs can save time and costs for pharmaceutical companies and optimize dosing to maximize patient benefit.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.40%
发文量
146
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic and Exposure-Response Modeling of Garadacimab in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Hereditary Angioedema. Item Response Modeling and Artificial Neural Network for Differentiation of Parkinson's Patients and Subjects Without Evidence of Dopaminergic Deficit. Postmarketing Assessment of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Proof-of-Concept Using Model-Based Meta-Analysis and a Clinical Utility Index Approach. Evaluation of Adefovir PBPK Model to Assess Biomarker-Informed OAT1 Drug-Drug Interaction and Effect of Chronic Kidney Disease. A Population Pharmacokinetic Model to Inform Extension of the Eteplirsen Dosing Regimen Across the Broad DMD Population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1