Hounsfield Unit on Preoperative Computed Tomography as an Indicator of Prognosis in Patients with Liposarcoma.

0 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology research & practice Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.5152/tud.2024.24032
Ryo Andy Ogasawara, Shugo Yajima, Naoki Imasato, Kohei Hirose, Ken Sekiya, Madoka Kataoka, Yasukazu Nakanishi, Hitoshi Masuda
{"title":"Hounsfield Unit on Preoperative Computed Tomography as an Indicator of Prognosis in Patients with Liposarcoma.","authors":"Ryo Andy Ogasawara, Shugo Yajima, Naoki Imasato, Kohei Hirose, Ken Sekiya, Madoka Kataoka, Yasukazu Nakanishi, Hitoshi Masuda","doi":"10.5152/tud.2024.24032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Liposarcoma (LPS) is classified into 4 subtypes. As some subtypes have a high recurrence rate, knowing the risk of recurrence before surgery is important. Here, we aimed to investigate the relationship between Hounsfield units (HU) derived from preoperative computed tomography (CT) and the prognosis of patients undergoing surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We included 32 patients who underwent surgery for LPS between 2014 and 2022. Preoperative plain CT images were collected, and the HU value of each LPS was measured. The association between 2 HU categories (HU < cut-off vs. ≥ cut-off) and clinical variables was assessed. The optimal cut-off value was determined using statistical methods. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to determine the differences between the 2 HU categories at 2 endpoints: recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dedifferentiated subtype showed significantly higher HU values than the other subtypes (P < .001). The optimal cut-off value for HU was 20. HU < 20 was associated with young age, low-performance status, low Charlson Comorbidity Index, and well-differentiated pathology. The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that RFS and OS were significantly shorter in patients with HU ≥ 20 than in those with HU < 20 (P = .007 and .04, respectively). However, when stratified based on subtype, no significant differences were observed between dedifferentiated and other subtypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HU ≥ 20 on preoperative CT was associated with poor prognosis in LPS patients. Our findings suggest that preoperative CT-derived HU values may serve as useful predictors of prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":101337,"journal":{"name":"Urology research & practice","volume":"50 3","pages":"187-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562811/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology research & practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2024.24032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Liposarcoma (LPS) is classified into 4 subtypes. As some subtypes have a high recurrence rate, knowing the risk of recurrence before surgery is important. Here, we aimed to investigate the relationship between Hounsfield units (HU) derived from preoperative computed tomography (CT) and the prognosis of patients undergoing surgery.

Materials and methods: We included 32 patients who underwent surgery for LPS between 2014 and 2022. Preoperative plain CT images were collected, and the HU value of each LPS was measured. The association between 2 HU categories (HU < cut-off vs. ≥ cut-off) and clinical variables was assessed. The optimal cut-off value was determined using statistical methods. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to determine the differences between the 2 HU categories at 2 endpoints: recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results: The dedifferentiated subtype showed significantly higher HU values than the other subtypes (P < .001). The optimal cut-off value for HU was 20. HU < 20 was associated with young age, low-performance status, low Charlson Comorbidity Index, and well-differentiated pathology. The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that RFS and OS were significantly shorter in patients with HU ≥ 20 than in those with HU < 20 (P = .007 and .04, respectively). However, when stratified based on subtype, no significant differences were observed between dedifferentiated and other subtypes.

Conclusion: HU ≥ 20 on preoperative CT was associated with poor prognosis in LPS patients. Our findings suggest that preoperative CT-derived HU values may serve as useful predictors of prognosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为脂肪肉瘤患者预后指标的术前计算机断层扫描 Hounsfield 单位
目的:脂肪肉瘤(LPS)分为四种亚型。由于某些亚型的复发率较高,因此在手术前了解复发风险非常重要。在此,我们旨在研究术前计算机断层扫描(CT)得出的 Hounsfield 单位(HU)与手术患者预后之间的关系:我们纳入了2014年至2022年期间因LPS接受手术的32名患者。收集术前普通 CT 图像,并测量每个 LPS 的 HU 值。评估了两个HU值类别(HU<临界值与≥临界值)与临床变量之间的关联。采用统计学方法确定了最佳临界值。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法确定了两个 HU 类别在两个终点(无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS))上的差异:结果:再分化亚型的HU值明显高于其他亚型(P < .001)。HU的最佳临界值为20。HU值小于20与年轻、低绩效、低Charlson综合指数和病理分化良好有关。Kaplan-Meier 曲线显示,HU ≥ 20 的患者的 RFS 和 OS 明显短于 HU < 20 的患者(P = .007 和 .04)。然而,根据亚型进行分层时,未观察到再分化亚型与其他亚型之间存在显著差异:结论:术前 CT 显示的 HU≥20 与 LPS 患者的不良预后有关。我们的研究结果表明,术前 CT 导出的 HU 值可作为预后的有用预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prognostic Value of TGF-β Expression in Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Reporting and Grading of Complications in Urological Surgery: Current Trends and Future Perspectives. "Minho Technique" for Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit. A New Sperm Concentration Threshold for Y Chromosome Microdeletion Analysis in Infertile Men: Could It Be Azoopermia? Hounsfield Unit on Preoperative Computed Tomography as an Indicator of Prognosis in Patients with Liposarcoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1