A systematic review of poeciliid fish invasions in Africa.

IF 2.3 Q2 ECOLOGY BMC ecology and evolution Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1186/s12862-024-02321-3
Joshua Pritchard Cairns, Pedro Henrique Negreiros de Bragança, Josie South
{"title":"A systematic review of poeciliid fish invasions in Africa.","authors":"Joshua Pritchard Cairns, Pedro Henrique Negreiros de Bragança, Josie South","doi":"10.1186/s12862-024-02321-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This review compiles and synthesises the existing information concerning non-native poeciliid introductions to Africa. The recent upsurge in research on invasive poeciliids has revealed their widespread occurrence in Africa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the 87 relevant articles, 74% reported on the presence of Gambusia spp., 33% on P. reticulata, 19% on X. hellerii, 11% on X. maculatus, and 5% on other ornamental poeciliids. Overall, poeciliids have been documented as introduced to 25 different countries in Africa. With Gambusia spp. being introduced to 16 countries and P. reticulata to 19 countries. Our results are representative of the current state of research on invasive poeciliids in Africa. There was a concentration of studies in South Africa, with limited research elsewhere. Current distribution data is relatively patchy, although widespread surveys of multiple river systems in Morocco and South Africa, confirmed widespread and abundant established poeciliid populations. The ecological impacts of invasive poeciliids in Africa remain understudied but evidence indicates deleterious effects on native fish, invertebrates, and amphibians, many of which are critically endangered or endemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current research is limited in reporting from certain countries and ecological impacts. An increased effort to monitor species composition in vulnerable waterbodies, especially in the many African countries where invasive poeciliids are reported, should be completed to reveal further established populations. Future research should prioritise quantifying the ecological impacts of invasive poeciliids in the field and identifying both vulnerable and resistant native ecosystems to guide future management decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93910,"journal":{"name":"BMC ecology and evolution","volume":"24 1","pages":"136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539733/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC ecology and evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-024-02321-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This review compiles and synthesises the existing information concerning non-native poeciliid introductions to Africa. The recent upsurge in research on invasive poeciliids has revealed their widespread occurrence in Africa.

Results: Within the 87 relevant articles, 74% reported on the presence of Gambusia spp., 33% on P. reticulata, 19% on X. hellerii, 11% on X. maculatus, and 5% on other ornamental poeciliids. Overall, poeciliids have been documented as introduced to 25 different countries in Africa. With Gambusia spp. being introduced to 16 countries and P. reticulata to 19 countries. Our results are representative of the current state of research on invasive poeciliids in Africa. There was a concentration of studies in South Africa, with limited research elsewhere. Current distribution data is relatively patchy, although widespread surveys of multiple river systems in Morocco and South Africa, confirmed widespread and abundant established poeciliid populations. The ecological impacts of invasive poeciliids in Africa remain understudied but evidence indicates deleterious effects on native fish, invertebrates, and amphibians, many of which are critically endangered or endemic.

Conclusion: Current research is limited in reporting from certain countries and ecological impacts. An increased effort to monitor species composition in vulnerable waterbodies, especially in the many African countries where invasive poeciliids are reported, should be completed to reveal further established populations. Future research should prioritise quantifying the ecological impacts of invasive poeciliids in the field and identifying both vulnerable and resistant native ecosystems to guide future management decisions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对poeciliid鱼类入侵非洲的系统回顾。
背景:本综述汇编并综合了有关非本地鞘翅目昆虫引入非洲的现有信息。最近对外来poeciliid的研究激增,揭示了它们在非洲的广泛存在:结果:在 87 篇相关文章中,74% 报道了 Gambusia spp.、33% 报道了 P.reticulata、19% 报道了 X.hellerii、11% 报道了 X.maculatus、5% 报道了其他观赏鞘翅目动物。总体而言,据记录,poeciliids已被引入非洲25个不同的国家。Gambusia spp.传入了16个国家,P. reticulata传入了19个国家。我们的研究结果代表了目前对非洲入侵poeciliids的研究现状。研究主要集中在南非,其他地方的研究有限。目前的分布数据相对零散,但对摩洛哥和南非多个河流系统的广泛调查证实,poeciliid种群广泛且数量庞大。外来栉水母对非洲生态环境的影响仍未得到充分研究,但有证据表明,它们对本地鱼类、无脊椎动物和两栖动物造成了有害影响,其中许多是极度濒危或特有物种:目前的研究在某些国家的报告和生态影响方面还很有限。应加大力度监测脆弱水体中的物种组成,特别是在许多非洲国家,这些国家都有关于入侵栉水母的报道,应进一步揭示其种群数量。未来的研究应优先量化入侵栉水母的实地生态影响,并确定脆弱和具有抵抗力的本地生态系统,以指导未来的管理决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The gut microbiota of three avian species living in sympatry. Greater risk-taking by non-native than native shrimp: an advantage in a human-disturbed environment? Survival cost sharing among altruistic full siblings in Mendelian population. Next-generation phylogeography reveals unanticipated population history and climate and human impacts on the endangered floodplain bitterling (Acheilognathus longipinnis). Repeated evolution on oceanic islands: comparative genomics reveals species-specific processes in birds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1