Telomere length and mitochondrial DNA copy number in association with trauma-focused psychotherapy efficacy

Alessandra Minelli , Anna Meloni , Marco Bortolomasi , Claudia Pisanu , Elisa Zampieri , Donatella Congiu , Beatrice Lana , Mirko Manchia , Mattia Meattini , Pasquale Paribello
{"title":"Telomere length and mitochondrial DNA copy number in association with trauma-focused psychotherapy efficacy","authors":"Alessandra Minelli ,&nbsp;Anna Meloni ,&nbsp;Marco Bortolomasi ,&nbsp;Claudia Pisanu ,&nbsp;Elisa Zampieri ,&nbsp;Donatella Congiu ,&nbsp;Beatrice Lana ,&nbsp;Mirko Manchia ,&nbsp;Mattia Meattini ,&nbsp;Pasquale Paribello","doi":"10.1016/j.nsa.2024.104095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Early life adversities (ELA) have been linked to a greater risk for major depressive disorder (MDD) and treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The molecular mechanisms underlying the link between ELA and MDD and/or TRD are yet unknown. It has been suggested that ELA induces an allostatic burden, which in turn promotes oxidative stress and an inflammatory response that are further intensified by the influence of maladaptive coping behaviour. In this study we explored the role of two markers of cellular aging and oxidative stress (leukocyte telomere length (LTL) and mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNAcn)) in TRD and in response to trauma-focused psychotherapies. The study comprised 30 TRD patients receiving trauma-focused psychotherapies and 65 healthy controls. LTL and mtDNAcn were measured at baseline and four weeks after the end of the psychotherapy sessions. Response was defined based on reduction in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). In the case control analysis, the logistic regression model showed that mtDNAcn but not LTL was a significant predictor of diagnosis (chi-square 92.108, p = 7.72e-20; contribution of mtDNAcn, B = −9-297, p = 0.00009). In the TRD sample, LTL and mtDNAcn were inversely correlated with MADRS score at baseline (LTL, Pearson's r = −0.478, p = 0.008; mtDNAcn, Pearson's r = −0.656, p = 0.00008), but there was no difference in either LTL or mtDNAcn between responders and non-responders. In conclusion, our findings support an involvement of cellular aging in TRD, and suggest that LTL and mtDNAcn are not predictors or mediators of response to trauma-focused psychotherapies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100952,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Applied","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 104095"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Applied","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772408524001601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early life adversities (ELA) have been linked to a greater risk for major depressive disorder (MDD) and treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The molecular mechanisms underlying the link between ELA and MDD and/or TRD are yet unknown. It has been suggested that ELA induces an allostatic burden, which in turn promotes oxidative stress and an inflammatory response that are further intensified by the influence of maladaptive coping behaviour. In this study we explored the role of two markers of cellular aging and oxidative stress (leukocyte telomere length (LTL) and mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNAcn)) in TRD and in response to trauma-focused psychotherapies. The study comprised 30 TRD patients receiving trauma-focused psychotherapies and 65 healthy controls. LTL and mtDNAcn were measured at baseline and four weeks after the end of the psychotherapy sessions. Response was defined based on reduction in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). In the case control analysis, the logistic regression model showed that mtDNAcn but not LTL was a significant predictor of diagnosis (chi-square 92.108, p = 7.72e-20; contribution of mtDNAcn, B = −9-297, p = 0.00009). In the TRD sample, LTL and mtDNAcn were inversely correlated with MADRS score at baseline (LTL, Pearson's r = −0.478, p = 0.008; mtDNAcn, Pearson's r = −0.656, p = 0.00008), but there was no difference in either LTL or mtDNAcn between responders and non-responders. In conclusion, our findings support an involvement of cellular aging in TRD, and suggest that LTL and mtDNAcn are not predictors or mediators of response to trauma-focused psychotherapies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
端粒长度和线粒体DNA拷贝数与创伤心理治疗疗效的关系
早期生活逆境(ELA)与罹患重度抑郁症(MDD)和耐药性抑郁症(TRD)的更大风险有关。ELA与MDD和/或TRD之间的分子机制尚不清楚。有研究认为,ELA 会诱发异质负荷,进而促进氧化应激和炎症反应,而适应不良的应对行为又会进一步加剧这种反应。在这项研究中,我们探讨了细胞衰老和氧化应激的两个标志物(白细胞端粒长度(LTL)和线粒体DNA拷贝数(mtDNAcn))在TRD中的作用以及对以创伤为重点的心理疗法的反应。研究对象包括30名接受创伤心理治疗的TRD患者和65名健康对照者。LTL和mtDNAcn分别在基线和心理治疗疗程结束后四周进行测量。根据蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)的降低程度来定义反应。在病例对照分析中,逻辑回归模型显示,mtDNAcn而非LTL是诊断的重要预测因素(秩方92.108,p = 7.72e-20;mtDNAcn的贡献,B = -9-297,p = 0.00009)。在TRD样本中,LTL和mtDNAcn与基线时的MADRS评分成反比(LTL,Pearson's r = -0.478,p = 0.008;mtDNAcn,Pearson's r = -0.656,p = 0.00008),但LTL或mtDNAcn在应答者和非应答者之间没有差异。总之,我们的研究结果支持细胞老化参与了TRD,并表明LTL和mtDNAcn不是创伤心理治疗反应的预测因子或中介因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Testing the usefulness of a quality system in preclinical research Telomere length and mitochondrial DNA copy number in association with trauma-focused psychotherapy efficacy Knowledge gaps in psychedelic medicalisation: Preclinical and neuroimaging mechanisms A machine learning pipeline for efficient differentiation between bipolar and major depressive disorder based on multimodal structural neuroimaging Progress and developments in pharmacogenomics and pharmacoepigenomics discovery and translation for the personalization of pharmacological treatments in psychiatric disorders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1