Meal pickup and delivery problem with appointment time and uncertainty in order cancellation

Guiqin Xue , Zheng Wang , Jiuh-Biing Sheu
{"title":"Meal pickup and delivery problem with appointment time and uncertainty in order cancellation","authors":"Guiqin Xue ,&nbsp;Zheng Wang ,&nbsp;Jiuh-Biing Sheu","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2024.103845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Online-ordered meal logistics services (OMLSs) that accept online bookings and make vehicle plans to deliver meals from restaurants to customers have recently emerged. Customers have the option to cancel orders that are not delivered by appointment times, leading to significant financial, reputational, and customer losses for the OMLS providers. This study aims to make an appropriate vehicle plan for OMLS providers to minimize the expected total cost under the uncertainty of order cancellations. The problem is formulated as a two-stage stochastic programming model, and sample average approximation equivalent problems are generated using Monte Carlo simulation. To solve the equivalent problems, a parallel adaptive large neighborhood search (pALNS) with statistical guarantees is developed. Experiment results show that the vehicle plan derived from the ALNS is much better than the solution found by Gurobi within 10,800 s, with an average improvement of 14.90%. Additionally, the pALNS provides better statistical bounds in a shorter time compared to both the ALNS and the unsynchronized pALNS. Analytical experiments reveal that earlier cancellations lead to more severe consequences, offering valuable insights for OMLS providers to implement proactive measures to retain “urgent” customers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 103845"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554524004368","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online-ordered meal logistics services (OMLSs) that accept online bookings and make vehicle plans to deliver meals from restaurants to customers have recently emerged. Customers have the option to cancel orders that are not delivered by appointment times, leading to significant financial, reputational, and customer losses for the OMLS providers. This study aims to make an appropriate vehicle plan for OMLS providers to minimize the expected total cost under the uncertainty of order cancellations. The problem is formulated as a two-stage stochastic programming model, and sample average approximation equivalent problems are generated using Monte Carlo simulation. To solve the equivalent problems, a parallel adaptive large neighborhood search (pALNS) with statistical guarantees is developed. Experiment results show that the vehicle plan derived from the ALNS is much better than the solution found by Gurobi within 10,800 s, with an average improvement of 14.90%. Additionally, the pALNS provides better statistical bounds in a shorter time compared to both the ALNS and the unsynchronized pALNS. Analytical experiments reveal that earlier cancellations lead to more severe consequences, offering valuable insights for OMLS providers to implement proactive measures to retain “urgent” customers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
取餐和送餐问题与预约时间和订单取消的不确定性有关
最近出现了在线订餐物流服务(OMLS),这些服务接受在线预订,并制定车辆计划,将餐厅的饭菜送到顾客手中。客户可以选择取消未按预约时间送餐的订单,这给 OMLS 提供商带来了巨大的经济、声誉和客户损失。本研究旨在为 OMLS 提供商制定适当的车辆计划,以便在订单取消的不确定性下最大限度地降低预期总成本。该问题被表述为一个两阶段随机编程模型,并利用蒙特卡罗模拟生成了样本平均近似等效问题。为解决等价问题,开发了一种具有统计保证的并行自适应大邻域搜索(pALNS)。实验结果表明,在 10,800 秒内,ALNS 得出的车辆计划比 Gurobi 找到的解决方案要好得多,平均提高了 14.90%。此外,与 ALNS 和非同步 pALNS 相比,pALNS 能在更短的时间内提供更好的统计边界。分析实验表明,更早的取消会导致更严重的后果,这为 OMLS 提供商采取积极措施留住 "紧急 "客户提供了宝贵的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management. Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Towards advanced decision-making support for shipping safety: A functional connectivity analysis The Impact of ISSB’s Scope 3 GHG Emissions Validation on US Manufacturers’ Stock Valuations: Analyzing the Role of Supplier Complexity Coordinating telehealth platform with revenue-sharing contracts under different reimbursement mechanisms Balancing price and quality decisions of the environmental supply chain in the presence of socially responsible consumer The bright side of low-carbon technology sharing in a capital-constrained supply chain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1