K.K. Horst , Z. Zhou , N.C. Hull , P.G. Thacker , B.A. Kassmeyer , M.P. Johnson , N. Demirel , A.D. Missert , K. Weger , L. Yu
{"title":"Radiation dose reduction in pediatric computed tomography (CT) using deep convolutional neural network denoising","authors":"K.K. Horst , Z. Zhou , N.C. Hull , P.G. Thacker , B.A. Kassmeyer , M.P. Johnson , N. Demirel , A.D. Missert , K. Weger , L. Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.crad.2024.09.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>We evaluated the quality of noncontrast chest computed tomography (CT) for pediatric patients at two dose levels with and without denoising using a deep convolutional neural network (CNN).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Forty children underwent noncontrast chest CTs for “chronic cough” using a routine dose (RD) protocol. Images were reconstructed using iterative reconstruction (IR). A validated noise insertion method was used to simulate 20% dose (TD) data for each case. A deep CNN model was trained and validated on 10 cases and then applied to the remaining 30 cases. Three certificate of qualification (CAQ)-certified pediatric radiologists evaluated 30 cases under 4 conditions: (1) RD + IR; (2) RD + CNN; (3) TD + IR; and (4) TD + CNN. Likert scales were used to score subjective image quality (1–5, 5 = excellent) and subjective noise artifact (1–4, 4 = no noise). Images were reviewed for specific findings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For the 30 patients evaluated (14 female, mean age: 10.8 years, range: 0.17–17), the mean effective dose was 0.46 ± 0.21 mSv for the original RD exam, with an effective dose of 0.09 mSv for the TD exam. Both RD + CNN (3.6 ± 1.1, p < 0.001) and TD + CNN (3.4 ± 0.9, <em>p</em> = 0.023) had higher image quality than RD + IR (3.1 ± 0.9). Both RD + CNN (3.2 ± 0.9, p-value = <0.001) and TD + CNN (2.9 ± 0.6, p-value = 0.001) showed significantly lower subjective noise artifact scores than RD + IR (2.7 ± 0.7). There was excellent intrareader (RD + IR-RD + CNN: mean κ = 0.96, RD + IR-TD + CNN = 0.96, RD + IR-TD + IR = 0.98) and moderate inter-reader reliability (RD + IR: mean κ = 0.55, RD + CNN = 0.50, TD + CNN = 0.54, TD + IR = 0.57) on all 4 image reconstructions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CNN denoising outperforms IR as a means of radiation dose reduction in pediatric CT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10695,"journal":{"name":"Clinical radiology","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 106705"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009926024005166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
We evaluated the quality of noncontrast chest computed tomography (CT) for pediatric patients at two dose levels with and without denoising using a deep convolutional neural network (CNN).
Materials and methods
Forty children underwent noncontrast chest CTs for “chronic cough” using a routine dose (RD) protocol. Images were reconstructed using iterative reconstruction (IR). A validated noise insertion method was used to simulate 20% dose (TD) data for each case. A deep CNN model was trained and validated on 10 cases and then applied to the remaining 30 cases. Three certificate of qualification (CAQ)-certified pediatric radiologists evaluated 30 cases under 4 conditions: (1) RD + IR; (2) RD + CNN; (3) TD + IR; and (4) TD + CNN. Likert scales were used to score subjective image quality (1–5, 5 = excellent) and subjective noise artifact (1–4, 4 = no noise). Images were reviewed for specific findings.
Results
For the 30 patients evaluated (14 female, mean age: 10.8 years, range: 0.17–17), the mean effective dose was 0.46 ± 0.21 mSv for the original RD exam, with an effective dose of 0.09 mSv for the TD exam. Both RD + CNN (3.6 ± 1.1, p < 0.001) and TD + CNN (3.4 ± 0.9, p = 0.023) had higher image quality than RD + IR (3.1 ± 0.9). Both RD + CNN (3.2 ± 0.9, p-value = <0.001) and TD + CNN (2.9 ± 0.6, p-value = 0.001) showed significantly lower subjective noise artifact scores than RD + IR (2.7 ± 0.7). There was excellent intrareader (RD + IR-RD + CNN: mean κ = 0.96, RD + IR-TD + CNN = 0.96, RD + IR-TD + IR = 0.98) and moderate inter-reader reliability (RD + IR: mean κ = 0.55, RD + CNN = 0.50, TD + CNN = 0.54, TD + IR = 0.57) on all 4 image reconstructions.
Conclusion
CNN denoising outperforms IR as a means of radiation dose reduction in pediatric CT.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Radiology is published by Elsevier on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology is an International Journal bringing you original research, editorials and review articles on all aspects of diagnostic imaging, including:
• Computed tomography
• Magnetic resonance imaging
• Ultrasonography
• Digital radiology
• Interventional radiology
• Radiography
• Nuclear medicine
Papers on radiological protection, quality assurance, audit in radiology and matters relating to radiological training and education are also included. In addition, each issue contains correspondence, book reviews and notices of forthcoming events.