Can polycentric urban morphology improve transportation carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from 285 Chinese cities, 2005–2020

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Transportation Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1007/s11116-024-10551-z
Zilin Deng, Linna Li, Yingjie Du
{"title":"Can polycentric urban morphology improve transportation carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from 285 Chinese cities, 2005–2020","authors":"Zilin Deng, Linna Li, Yingjie Du","doi":"10.1007/s11116-024-10551-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reducing transportation carbon emissions in cities is crucial for sustainable development. Although polycentric urban morphology is viewed as a potential strategy for enhancing transportation carbon emission efficiency, its role remains contentious, and the effects of various dimensions of polycentricity have not been fully examined. This study investigates the spatiotemporal effects of polycentric urban morphology on transportation carbon emission efficiency. Analyzing per capita transportation carbon emissions (PTCEs) in 285 Chinese cities from 2000 to 2020, we quantified urban polycentricity across four dimensions: number of urban centers, distance between centers, sub-center importance, and compactness. We employed a geographically and temporally weighted regression model to assess how these dimensions influenced PTCEs over time and space. Our results reveal an overall increase in both PTCEs and polycentricity, with significant regional variations. Initially, the number of urban centers was negatively correlated with PTCEs, but this effect weakened over time. In contrast, greater distances between centers and higher compactness were associated with increased PTCEs, with these effects intensifying over time. The influence of sub-center importance on PTCEs followed an inverted U-shaped trend. Spatially, the number of centers correlated negatively with PTCEs, while sub-center importance correlated positively. The benefits of reduced distance between centers diminished from northeast to southwest China, and the impact of compactness on PTCEs varied, being positive in the east and negative in the west. These findings highlight the need for region-specific spatial policies to effectively enhance urban transportation carbon emission efficiency and develop low-carbon urban transportation systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10551-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reducing transportation carbon emissions in cities is crucial for sustainable development. Although polycentric urban morphology is viewed as a potential strategy for enhancing transportation carbon emission efficiency, its role remains contentious, and the effects of various dimensions of polycentricity have not been fully examined. This study investigates the spatiotemporal effects of polycentric urban morphology on transportation carbon emission efficiency. Analyzing per capita transportation carbon emissions (PTCEs) in 285 Chinese cities from 2000 to 2020, we quantified urban polycentricity across four dimensions: number of urban centers, distance between centers, sub-center importance, and compactness. We employed a geographically and temporally weighted regression model to assess how these dimensions influenced PTCEs over time and space. Our results reveal an overall increase in both PTCEs and polycentricity, with significant regional variations. Initially, the number of urban centers was negatively correlated with PTCEs, but this effect weakened over time. In contrast, greater distances between centers and higher compactness were associated with increased PTCEs, with these effects intensifying over time. The influence of sub-center importance on PTCEs followed an inverted U-shaped trend. Spatially, the number of centers correlated negatively with PTCEs, while sub-center importance correlated positively. The benefits of reduced distance between centers diminished from northeast to southwest China, and the impact of compactness on PTCEs varied, being positive in the east and negative in the west. These findings highlight the need for region-specific spatial policies to effectively enhance urban transportation carbon emission efficiency and develop low-carbon urban transportation systems.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多中心城市形态能否提高交通碳排放效率?来自 2005-2020 年中国 285 个城市的证据
减少城市交通碳排放对可持续发展至关重要。虽然多中心城市形态被视为提高交通碳排放效率的潜在策略,但其作用仍存在争议,而且多中心性的不同维度的影响尚未得到充分研究。本研究探讨了多中心城市形态对交通碳排放效率的时空影响。通过分析 2000 年至 2020 年中国 285 个城市的人均交通碳排放量(PTCEs),我们从城市中心数量、中心间距离、副中心重要性和紧凑性四个维度对城市多中心性进行了量化。我们采用了一个地理和时间加权回归模型来评估这些维度如何在时间和空间上影响城市多中心化程度。我们的研究结果表明,PTCEs 和多中心性总体上都在增加,但地区间差异显著。最初,城市中心的数量与 PTCEs 呈负相关,但随着时间的推移,这种影响逐渐减弱。与此相反,中心之间的距离越远、密集度越高,则 PTCEs 越高,而且随着时间的推移,这些影响会逐渐增强。副中心的重要性对 PTCE 的影响呈倒 U 型趋势。在空间上,中心数量与 PTCE 负相关,而副中心重要性与 PTCE 正相关。从中国东北部到西南部,中心间距离缩短带来的益处逐渐减小,中心紧凑程度对 PTCE 的影响也各不相同,东部为正,西部为负。这些研究结果突出表明,要有效提高城市交通碳排放效率,发展低碳城市交通系统,需要制定针对具体区域的空间政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
期刊最新文献
The effect of COVID-19: to what extent does food delivery substitute eating out trips in Yogyakarta, Indonesia? Can polycentric urban morphology improve transportation carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from 285 Chinese cities, 2005–2020 Mapping connection and substitution behaviors between shared E-bicycles and public transportation Willingness to use ridesplitting services for home-to-work morning commute in the post-COVID-19 era An interdisciplinary hybrid instrument to explore suburban challenges in Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1