Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the 120° Flexed-Knee Position for Detecting and Classifying Meniscal Ramp Lesion

Satoshi Nonaka, Kazuhisa Hatayama, Shintarou Tokunaga, Hibiki Kakiage, Satoshi Hirasawa, Masanori Terauchi, Hirotaka Chikuda
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the 120° Flexed-Knee Position for Detecting and Classifying Meniscal Ramp Lesion","authors":"Satoshi Nonaka, Kazuhisa Hatayama, Shintarou Tokunaga, Hibiki Kakiage, Satoshi Hirasawa, Masanori Terauchi, Hirotaka Chikuda","doi":"10.1177/03635465241290516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Detection of meniscal ramp lesions concomitant with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury using conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has low sensitivity, and these lesions are currently difficult to diagnose preoperatively.Purpose/Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of MRI in detecting the presence of meniscal ramp lesions in the 120° flexed-knee position compared with that in the near–extended-knee position. It was hypothesized that the diagnostic performance of MRI in the 120° flexed-knee position would be better than that in the extended-knee position.Study Design:Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.Methods:This retrospective study of prospectively collected data between February 2019 and January 2024 included 154 consecutive patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. All patients underwent 3-T MRI examination in the near extended- and 120° flexed-knee positions preoperatively. The presence and Thaunat classification of ramp lesions were separately detected on each MRI scan and confirmed via arthroscopy during ACL reconstruction. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and conditional relative odds ratios for detecting ramp lesions and the classification accuracy were compared between 2 MRI modalities. The accuracies of these MRI scans in acute and chronic cases were also evaluated.Results:This study included 154 patients (79 male and 75 female; mean age, 29.0 ± 14.2 years). A total of 62 ramp lesions (40.3%) were observed on arthroscopy. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI in near extension were 69.4% and 77.2%, respectively, and those in flexion were 91.9% and 94.6%, respectively, with significant superiority in MRI at knee flexion ( P = .003 and P < .001, respectively). The conditional relative odds ratio between the MRI examinations at these 2 positions was 10.3 (95% CI, 4.82-21.8). The classification accuracy of MRI in flexion was significantly higher than that of MRI in near extension (accuracy, 49 vs 11; P < .001). The diagnostic accuracy of MRI in the 120° flexed-knee position was significantly higher than that in the near–extended-knee position in the acute cases ( P < .05); however, no significant differences were observed in the chronic cases.Conclusion:The diagnostic accuracy of MRI in the 120° flexed-knee position for detecting and classifying meniscal ramp lesions was superior to that of MRI in the near–extended-knee position.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241290516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:Detection of meniscal ramp lesions concomitant with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury using conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has low sensitivity, and these lesions are currently difficult to diagnose preoperatively.Purpose/Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of MRI in detecting the presence of meniscal ramp lesions in the 120° flexed-knee position compared with that in the near–extended-knee position. It was hypothesized that the diagnostic performance of MRI in the 120° flexed-knee position would be better than that in the extended-knee position.Study Design:Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.Methods:This retrospective study of prospectively collected data between February 2019 and January 2024 included 154 consecutive patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. All patients underwent 3-T MRI examination in the near extended- and 120° flexed-knee positions preoperatively. The presence and Thaunat classification of ramp lesions were separately detected on each MRI scan and confirmed via arthroscopy during ACL reconstruction. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and conditional relative odds ratios for detecting ramp lesions and the classification accuracy were compared between 2 MRI modalities. The accuracies of these MRI scans in acute and chronic cases were also evaluated.Results:This study included 154 patients (79 male and 75 female; mean age, 29.0 ± 14.2 years). A total of 62 ramp lesions (40.3%) were observed on arthroscopy. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI in near extension were 69.4% and 77.2%, respectively, and those in flexion were 91.9% and 94.6%, respectively, with significant superiority in MRI at knee flexion ( P = .003 and P < .001, respectively). The conditional relative odds ratio between the MRI examinations at these 2 positions was 10.3 (95% CI, 4.82-21.8). The classification accuracy of MRI in flexion was significantly higher than that of MRI in near extension (accuracy, 49 vs 11; P < .001). The diagnostic accuracy of MRI in the 120° flexed-knee position was significantly higher than that in the near–extended-knee position in the acute cases ( P < .05); however, no significant differences were observed in the chronic cases.Conclusion:The diagnostic accuracy of MRI in the 120° flexed-knee position for detecting and classifying meniscal ramp lesions was superior to that of MRI in the near–extended-knee position.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
屈膝 120°位磁共振成像在检测和分类半月板斜坡病变方面的诊断准确性
背景:使用传统磁共振成像(MRI)检测前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤同时伴有的半月板斜坡病变的灵敏度较低,目前很难在术前诊断出这些病变。目的/假设:本研究的目的是评估MRI在检测膝关节120°屈曲位与膝关节近伸位半月板斜坡病变时的准确性。研究设计:队列研究(诊断);证据级别,2.方法:这一回顾性研究对2019年2月至2024年1月期间前瞻性收集的数据进行了分析,纳入了154名接受前交叉韧带重建术的连续患者。所有患者术前均在近伸膝和屈膝120°位接受了3-T磁共振成像检查。在每次核磁共振扫描中分别检测斜坡病变的存在和Thaunat分类,并在前交叉韧带重建术中通过关节镜进行确认。比较了两种磁共振成像模式检测斜坡病变的诊断敏感性、特异性和条件相对几率以及分类的准确性。结果:该研究共纳入 154 名患者(男性 79 人,女性 75 人;平均年龄(29.0 ± 14.2)岁)。关节镜检查共观察到 62 个斜坡病变(40.3%)。核磁共振成像在近伸位时的灵敏度和特异度分别为 69.4% 和 77.2%,在屈曲位时的灵敏度和特异度分别为 91.9% 和 94.6%,其中核磁共振成像在膝关节屈曲位时具有显著优势(P = .003 和 P <.001)。在这两个位置进行核磁共振成像检查的条件相对几率比为 10.3(95% CI,4.82-21.8)。屈曲位核磁共振成像的分类准确率明显高于近伸位核磁共振成像(准确率为 49 vs 11;P < .001)。在急性病例中,膝关节120°屈曲位磁共振成像的诊断准确率明显高于膝关节近伸位磁共振成像的诊断准确率(P <.05);但在慢性病例中未观察到明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the 120° Flexed-Knee Position for Detecting and Classifying Meniscal Ramp Lesion Reversal of Denervation Changes in Infraspinatus Muscle After Operative Management of Paralabral Cysts: An MRI-Based Study. Physiologic Preoperative Knee Hyperextension Is Not Associated With Postoperative Laxity, Subjective Knee Function, or Revision Surgery After ACL Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Autografts. All-Inside Endoscopic Classic Bröstrom-Gould Technique: Medium-term Results. Circumferential Labral Reconstruction With Knotless All-Suture Anchors Restores Hip Distractive Stability: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1