Comparison of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization combined with apatinib versus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized, prospective, multicenter phase III trial

IF 40.8 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1038/s41392-024-02012-x
Xuhua Duan, Hao Li, Donglin Kuang, Pengfei Chen, Mengfan Zhang, Tengfei Li, Dechao Jiao, Yanliang Li, Xiang He, Cheng Xing, Haibo Wang, Yaoxian Liu, Limin Xie, Shixi Zhang, Qiang Zhang, Peixin Zhu, Yongchuang Chang, Jichen Xie, Jianzhuang Ren, Xinwei Han
{"title":"Comparison of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization combined with apatinib versus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized, prospective, multicenter phase III trial","authors":"Xuhua Duan, Hao Li, Donglin Kuang, Pengfei Chen, Mengfan Zhang, Tengfei Li, Dechao Jiao, Yanliang Li, Xiang He, Cheng Xing, Haibo Wang, Yaoxian Liu, Limin Xie, Shixi Zhang, Qiang Zhang, Peixin Zhu, Yongchuang Chang, Jichen Xie, Jianzhuang Ren, Xinwei Han","doi":"10.1038/s41392-024-02012-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This randomized, prospective, multicenter (12 centers in China) phase III trial (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry #ChiCTR2000041170) compared drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) combined with apatinib and DEB-TACE monotherapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. Overall survival (OS), mRECIST-based objective response rates (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were secondary endpoints. Totally 243 cases were randomized, with 122 and 121 in the DEB-TACE + apatinib and DEB-TACE groups, respectively. Cases administered DEB-TACE + apatinib displayed markedly improved median PFS (7.1 months [95%CI 6.6–8.3] vs. 5.2 months [95%CI 5.0–5.9]) and OS (23.3 months [95%CI 20.7–29.6] vs. 18.9 months [95%CI 17.9–20.1] compared with those treated with DEB-TACE (both <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Additionally, patients administered DEB-TACE + apatinib had elevated ORR (56.6% vs. 38.8%) and DCR (89.3% vs. 80.2%) versus the DEB-TACE group (both <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Majority of TRAEs were mild and manageable. Regarding DEB-TACE-related TRAEs, the rates of hepatic artery thinning and spasms were elevated during the second DEB-TACE in cases administered DEB-TACE + apatinib vs. DEB-TACE. The commonest apatinib-related TRAEs in the DEB-TACE + apatinib group included hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, fatigue, and diarrhea. In conclusion, DEB-TACE plus apatinib demonstrates superior PFS versus DEB-TACE monotherapy in uHCC cases, maintaining a favorable safety profile with similar occurrences of AEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21766,"journal":{"name":"Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":40.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-024-02012-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This randomized, prospective, multicenter (12 centers in China) phase III trial (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry #ChiCTR2000041170) compared drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) combined with apatinib and DEB-TACE monotherapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. Overall survival (OS), mRECIST-based objective response rates (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were secondary endpoints. Totally 243 cases were randomized, with 122 and 121 in the DEB-TACE + apatinib and DEB-TACE groups, respectively. Cases administered DEB-TACE + apatinib displayed markedly improved median PFS (7.1 months [95%CI 6.6–8.3] vs. 5.2 months [95%CI 5.0–5.9]) and OS (23.3 months [95%CI 20.7–29.6] vs. 18.9 months [95%CI 17.9–20.1] compared with those treated with DEB-TACE (both p < 0.001). Additionally, patients administered DEB-TACE + apatinib had elevated ORR (56.6% vs. 38.8%) and DCR (89.3% vs. 80.2%) versus the DEB-TACE group (both p < 0.001). Majority of TRAEs were mild and manageable. Regarding DEB-TACE-related TRAEs, the rates of hepatic artery thinning and spasms were elevated during the second DEB-TACE in cases administered DEB-TACE + apatinib vs. DEB-TACE. The commonest apatinib-related TRAEs in the DEB-TACE + apatinib group included hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, fatigue, and diarrhea. In conclusion, DEB-TACE plus apatinib demonstrates superior PFS versus DEB-TACE monotherapy in uHCC cases, maintaining a favorable safety profile with similar occurrences of AEs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物洗脱珠经动脉化疗栓塞联合阿帕替尼与药物洗脱珠经动脉化疗栓塞治疗不可切除肝细胞癌的比较:随机、前瞻性、多中心III期试验
这项随机、前瞻性、多中心(中国有12个中心)III期试验(中国临床试验注册号:ChiCTR2000041170)比较了药物洗脱珠经动脉化疗栓塞术(DEB-TACE)联合阿帕替尼和DEB-TACE单药治疗不可切除肝细胞癌(uHCC)患者的疗效。无进展生存期(PFS)是主要终点。总生存期(OS)、基于mRECIST的客观反应率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)以及治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)是次要终点。共有243例患者接受了随机治疗,其中DEB-TACE+阿帕替尼组和DEB-TACE组分别有122例和121例。与接受 DEB-TACE 治疗的病例相比,接受 DEB-TACE + 阿帕替尼治疗的病例的中位 PFS(7.1 个月 [95%CI 6.6-8.3] vs. 5.2 个月 [95%CI 5.0-5.9])和 OS(23.3 个月 [95%CI 20.7-29.6] vs. 18.9 个月 [95%CI 17.9-20.1])明显改善(均为 p <0.001)。此外,与 DEB-TACE 组相比,接受 DEB-TACE + 阿帕替尼治疗的患者的 ORR(56.6% 对 38.8%)和 DCR(89.3% 对 80.2%)均有所提高(均为 p < 0.001)。大多数 TRAE 是轻微和可控的。关于DEB-TACE相关TRAEs,在第二次DEB-TACE期间,DEB-TACE+阿帕替尼与DEB-TACE相比,肝动脉变细和痉挛的发生率升高。在 DEB-TACE + 阿帕替尼组中,最常见的阿帕替尼相关 TRAE 包括高血压、手足综合征、疲劳和腹泻。总之,在uHCC病例中,DEB-TACE+阿帕替尼的PFS优于DEB-TACE单药治疗,同时保持了良好的安全性,AEs发生率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
44.50
自引率
1.50%
发文量
384
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy is an open access journal that focuses on timely publication of cutting-edge discoveries and advancements in basic science and clinical research related to signal transduction and targeted therapy. Scope: The journal covers research on major human diseases, including, but not limited to: Cancer,Cardiovascular diseases,Autoimmune diseases,Nervous system diseases.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization combined with apatinib versus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized, prospective, multicenter phase III trial Overexpression of STX11 alleviates pulmonary fibrosis by inhibiting fibroblast activation via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway Post-fast refeeding: rise of intestinal stemness and mutagen-induced cancer risk through polyamine metabolism Comprehensive snapshots of natural killer cells functions, signaling, molecular mechanisms and clinical utilization First-line benmelstobart plus anlotinib and chemotherapy in advanced or metastatic/recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multi-center phase 2 study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1