Amber G Brink, Julia Hanevelt, Laura W Leicher, Leon M G Moons, Frank P Vleggaar, Jelle F Huisman, Wouter de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel, Henderik L van Westreenen
{"title":"Colonoscopy Assisted Laparoscopic Wedge Resection for Colonic Lesions: Impact on Quality of LifE: Results from the LIMERIC Study.","authors":"Amber G Brink, Julia Hanevelt, Laura W Leicher, Leon M G Moons, Frank P Vleggaar, Jelle F Huisman, Wouter de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel, Henderik L van Westreenen","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The LIMERIC study has proven that colonoscopy-assisted laparoscopic wedge resection effectively and safely removes benign colonic lesions unsuitable for endoscopic removal, thereby avoiding the need for major surgery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of colonoscopy-assisted laparoscopic wedge on health-related quality of life of patients who participated in the LIMERIC study.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective multicenter study.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>The LIMERIC study was performed between 2016 and 2020 in 13 Dutch hospitals. EQ-5D-5L questionnaires were administered at baseline and 3 months after the procedure.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients with incomplete pre- or postoperative questionnaires or those undergoing combined interventions were excluded from the intention-to-treat analysis. Those for whom CAL-WR was not feasible or who underwent completion surgery were excluded from the per-protocol analysis.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Colonoscopy-assisted laparoscopic wedge for either (1) colon polyp unsuitable for endoscopic resection; (2) non-lifting residual or recurrent polyp within scar tissue following previous polypectomy; or (3) Rx/R1 endoscopic removal of a low-risk pT1 colon carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Three-month health-related quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Colonoscopy-assisted laparoscopic wedge did not affect health-related quality of life in the per-protocol analysis (n = 56), or in the intention-to-treat analysis (n = 67). The majority of patients reported no change in health status (57%). No significant differences were observed in the distribution of responses across all 5 dimensions before and after colonoscopy-assisted laparoscopic wedge. Patients' self-rated EQ-VAS was also unaffected by colonoscopy-assisted laparoscopic wedge, with a median VAS score of 82.5 at baseline and 80 after surgery in the per-protocol analysis (p = 0.63).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Solely a patient-reported outcome measure evaluating global health-related quality of life was used, rather than one specifically assessing disease-related quality of life, such as the QLQ-CR29.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Colonoscopy-assisted laparoscopic wedge has no significant impact on the health-related quality of life in patients with benign colonic lesions and should therefore be considered before major surgery is performed. See Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003531","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The LIMERIC study has proven that colonoscopy-assisted laparoscopic wedge resection effectively and safely removes benign colonic lesions unsuitable for endoscopic removal, thereby avoiding the need for major surgery.
Objective: To evaluate the impact of colonoscopy-assisted laparoscopic wedge on health-related quality of life of patients who participated in the LIMERIC study.
Design: Prospective multicenter study.
Settings: The LIMERIC study was performed between 2016 and 2020 in 13 Dutch hospitals. EQ-5D-5L questionnaires were administered at baseline and 3 months after the procedure.
Patients: Patients with incomplete pre- or postoperative questionnaires or those undergoing combined interventions were excluded from the intention-to-treat analysis. Those for whom CAL-WR was not feasible or who underwent completion surgery were excluded from the per-protocol analysis.
Intervention: Colonoscopy-assisted laparoscopic wedge for either (1) colon polyp unsuitable for endoscopic resection; (2) non-lifting residual or recurrent polyp within scar tissue following previous polypectomy; or (3) Rx/R1 endoscopic removal of a low-risk pT1 colon carcinoma.
Main outcome measures: Three-month health-related quality of life.
Results: Colonoscopy-assisted laparoscopic wedge did not affect health-related quality of life in the per-protocol analysis (n = 56), or in the intention-to-treat analysis (n = 67). The majority of patients reported no change in health status (57%). No significant differences were observed in the distribution of responses across all 5 dimensions before and after colonoscopy-assisted laparoscopic wedge. Patients' self-rated EQ-VAS was also unaffected by colonoscopy-assisted laparoscopic wedge, with a median VAS score of 82.5 at baseline and 80 after surgery in the per-protocol analysis (p = 0.63).
Limitations: Solely a patient-reported outcome measure evaluating global health-related quality of life was used, rather than one specifically assessing disease-related quality of life, such as the QLQ-CR29.
Conclusions: Colonoscopy-assisted laparoscopic wedge has no significant impact on the health-related quality of life in patients with benign colonic lesions and should therefore be considered before major surgery is performed. See Video Abstract.
期刊介绍:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (DCR) is the official journal of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) dedicated to advancing the knowledge of intestinal disorders by providing a forum for communication amongst their members. The journal features timely editorials, original contributions and technical notes.