Effects of 4 mg and 8 mg Dexamethasone Added to Intrathecal Bupivacaine on Perioperative Analgesia Among Adult Orthopedic Patients at Sodo Christian Hospital: A Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2024-10-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/8872988
Amanuel Essayas, Mebratu Legesse, Mebratu Tila, Ashagire Sintayhu, Eyosiyas Abreham, Getahun Dendir
{"title":"Effects of 4 mg and 8 mg Dexamethasone Added to Intrathecal Bupivacaine on Perioperative Analgesia Among Adult Orthopedic Patients at Sodo Christian Hospital: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Amanuel Essayas, Mebratu Legesse, Mebratu Tila, Ashagire Sintayhu, Eyosiyas Abreham, Getahun Dendir","doi":"10.1155/2024/8872988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Several adjuvant drugs have been tried to prolong spinal anesthesia block. Currently, dexamethasone appears to be effective in extending the duration of sensory block and enhancing analgesia during surgery. It is unclear, however, whether administering dexamethasone at a dose of 8 mg offers any advantages over administering it at a dose of 4 mg. <b>Objective:</b> To compare the effect of adding 4 and 8 mg dexamethasone to intrathecal bupivacaine on perioperative analgesia among adult orthopedic patients at Sodo Christian Hospital from June 1 to October 31, 2021. <b>Methodology:</b> A total of 178 adult patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery were randomly assigned to one of the two groups through a prospective cohort research design. A systematic random sampling method was used. For analysis, data were imported into EpiData v.4.6 and exported to SPSS v.25. Levene's test was used to verify homogeneity of variance, whereas the Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess data distribution. The Mann-Whitney test and the independent sample <i>t</i>-test were employed to compare numerical variables between study groups. Category variables were determined using the chi-square test. <i>p</i> values were deemed statistically significant if they were less than 0.05. <b>Result:</b> Between groups, the perioperative and demographic features were similar. The mean durations of sensory block (347.42 ± 91.06 versus 341.46 ± 68.84), motor block (308.36 ± 80.91 versus 310.84 ± 75.50), and overall analgesia (421.51 ± 121.62 versus 412.40 ± 107.0) minutes did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups. In addition, there was no significant difference (<i>p</i> > 0.05) in postoperative analgesic use, initial analgesia rescue time, or pain severity, as measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The addition of dexamethasone did not result in any issues, nor was there a statistically significant difference in the onset time between the two groups. <b>Conclusion:</b> Dexamethasone at a dose of 4 mg extends the duration of sensory, motor, and overall analgesia in a manner similar to that of 8 mg dexamethasone with comparable durations for both the initial analgesic request and overall analgesic use.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2024 ","pages":"8872988"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540886/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8872988","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several adjuvant drugs have been tried to prolong spinal anesthesia block. Currently, dexamethasone appears to be effective in extending the duration of sensory block and enhancing analgesia during surgery. It is unclear, however, whether administering dexamethasone at a dose of 8 mg offers any advantages over administering it at a dose of 4 mg. Objective: To compare the effect of adding 4 and 8 mg dexamethasone to intrathecal bupivacaine on perioperative analgesia among adult orthopedic patients at Sodo Christian Hospital from June 1 to October 31, 2021. Methodology: A total of 178 adult patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery were randomly assigned to one of the two groups through a prospective cohort research design. A systematic random sampling method was used. For analysis, data were imported into EpiData v.4.6 and exported to SPSS v.25. Levene's test was used to verify homogeneity of variance, whereas the Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess data distribution. The Mann-Whitney test and the independent sample t-test were employed to compare numerical variables between study groups. Category variables were determined using the chi-square test. p values were deemed statistically significant if they were less than 0.05. Result: Between groups, the perioperative and demographic features were similar. The mean durations of sensory block (347.42 ± 91.06 versus 341.46 ± 68.84), motor block (308.36 ± 80.91 versus 310.84 ± 75.50), and overall analgesia (421.51 ± 121.62 versus 412.40 ± 107.0) minutes did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups. In addition, there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in postoperative analgesic use, initial analgesia rescue time, or pain severity, as measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The addition of dexamethasone did not result in any issues, nor was there a statistically significant difference in the onset time between the two groups. Conclusion: Dexamethasone at a dose of 4 mg extends the duration of sensory, motor, and overall analgesia in a manner similar to that of 8 mg dexamethasone with comparable durations for both the initial analgesic request and overall analgesic use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
索多基督教医院成人骨科患者围手术期镇痛在鞘内布比卡因中添加 4 毫克和 8 毫克地塞米松的效果:前瞻性队列研究。
背景:已有多种辅助药物被用于延长脊髓麻醉阻滞时间。目前,地塞米松似乎能有效延长感觉阻滞的时间,并增强手术过程中的镇痛效果。然而,目前还不清楚 8 毫克剂量的地塞米松是否比 4 毫克剂量的地塞米松更有优势。研究目的比较 2021 年 6 月 1 日至 10 月 31 日期间索多基督教医院的成年骨科患者在鞘内布比卡因中加入 4 毫克和 8 毫克地塞米松对围手术期镇痛的影响。研究方法通过前瞻性队列研究设计,将178名接受择期骨科手术的成年患者随机分配到两组中的一组。采用系统随机抽样法。分析时,将数据导入 EpiData v.4.6 并导出到 SPSS v.25。使用 Levene 检验验证方差的同质性,而 Shapiro-Wilk 检验则用于评估数据分布。曼-惠特尼检验和独立样本 t 检验用于比较研究组之间的数字变量。类别变量采用卡方检验,P 值小于 0.05 则具有统计学意义。结果研究组间的围手术期和人口统计学特征相似。感觉阻滞平均持续时间(347.42 ± 91.06 对 341.46 ± 68.84)、运动阻滞平均持续时间(308.36 ± 80.91 对 310.84 ± 75.50)和总体镇痛平均持续时间(421.51 ± 121.62 对 412.40 ± 107.0)在统计学上没有显著差异。此外,术后镇痛药的使用、初始镇痛抢救时间或疼痛严重程度(以数字评分量表(NRS)衡量)也无明显差异(P > 0.05)。地塞米松的添加也没有导致任何问题,两组患者的起效时间也没有统计学意义上的显著差异。结论4 毫克剂量的地塞米松可延长感觉、运动和整体镇痛的持续时间,其效果与 8 毫克地塞米松相似,且初次镇痛请求和整体镇痛使用的持续时间相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Anesthesia Methods in Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Network Meta-Analysis. Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Fear Avoidance Component Scale (FACS). Effects of 4 mg and 8 mg Dexamethasone Added to Intrathecal Bupivacaine on Perioperative Analgesia Among Adult Orthopedic Patients at Sodo Christian Hospital: A Prospective Cohort Study. NPD1 Relieves Neuropathic Pain and Accelerates the Recovery of Motor Function After Peripheral Nerve Injury. Tooth Sensitivity Following Hydrogen Peroxide Bleaching With and Without Ozone: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Tooth Sensitivity Following H2O2 Versus H2O2/Ozone Bleaching.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1