Poor Sleep Quality Worsens Static and Dynamic Balance Control in Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2025-02-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/prm/5224748
Daniel K Y Zheng, Zhihan Sun, Jeremy R Chang, Frank F Huang, Yilin Liu, Siying Yu, Jinlong Wu, Zimeng Wang, Arnold Y L Wong, Xueqiang Wang
{"title":"Poor Sleep Quality Worsens Static and Dynamic Balance Control in Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Daniel K Y Zheng, Zhihan Sun, Jeremy R Chang, Frank F Huang, Yilin Liu, Siying Yu, Jinlong Wu, Zimeng Wang, Arnold Y L Wong, Xueqiang Wang","doi":"10.1155/prm/5224748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the influence of sleep quality and associated factors on balance control in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP). <b>Methods:</b> 85 participants (mean age 33.2 ± 12.5 years) with CLBP were recruited. Physical and emotional well-beings were evaluated using a battery of questionnaires. Sleep quality over the last month was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Participants were dichotomized into the good sleep quality (GSQ) and poor sleep quality (PSQ) groups if their PSQI scores were ≤ 5 and > 5, respectively. Balance control was measured using the one-leg stance with eyes closed and Y-balance test. <b>Results:</b> The GSQ group included 37 participants, while the PSQ group comprised 48 participants. After controlling for confounds (including gender, age, disability, anxiety, depression, and fear avoidance beliefs), participants with PSQ displayed significantly poorer performance in the one-leg stance with eyes closed and lower normalized posteromedial, posterolateral, and composite scores of the Y-balance test compared with participants with GSQ. Additionally, sleep quality accounted for 16.9%-24.9% of the variance in balance control, while age explained an additional 5.2%-13.2% of the variance. Additionally, higher levels of physical disability and anxiety were associated with poorer balance control. <b>Conclusions:</b> Individuals with concurrent CLBP and PSQ exhibit significantly worse balance control than those with CLBP alone. Future studies should investigate whether improving sleep quality, physical disability, and anxiety can enhance balance in individuals with CLBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"5224748"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11876524/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/5224748","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the influence of sleep quality and associated factors on balance control in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Methods: 85 participants (mean age 33.2 ± 12.5 years) with CLBP were recruited. Physical and emotional well-beings were evaluated using a battery of questionnaires. Sleep quality over the last month was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Participants were dichotomized into the good sleep quality (GSQ) and poor sleep quality (PSQ) groups if their PSQI scores were ≤ 5 and > 5, respectively. Balance control was measured using the one-leg stance with eyes closed and Y-balance test. Results: The GSQ group included 37 participants, while the PSQ group comprised 48 participants. After controlling for confounds (including gender, age, disability, anxiety, depression, and fear avoidance beliefs), participants with PSQ displayed significantly poorer performance in the one-leg stance with eyes closed and lower normalized posteromedial, posterolateral, and composite scores of the Y-balance test compared with participants with GSQ. Additionally, sleep quality accounted for 16.9%-24.9% of the variance in balance control, while age explained an additional 5.2%-13.2% of the variance. Additionally, higher levels of physical disability and anxiety were associated with poorer balance control. Conclusions: Individuals with concurrent CLBP and PSQ exhibit significantly worse balance control than those with CLBP alone. Future studies should investigate whether improving sleep quality, physical disability, and anxiety can enhance balance in individuals with CLBP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
期刊最新文献
Beneficial Effects of Exercise in Neuropathic Pain: An Overview of the Mechanisms Involved. Home-Based, Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves the Overall Pain Experience of Older Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis. Poor Sleep Quality Worsens Static and Dynamic Balance Control in Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study. The Effect of EX-B8 Acupressure on Labor Pain: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial. The Effect of Pain Coping Strategies on Perceived Social Support and Acceptance of Pain in Elderly Individuals With Chronic Pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1