Hideyuki Mizuno, Taku Nakaji, Sung Hyun Lee, Dousatsu Sakata, Katsumi Aoki, Kota Mizushima, Linh T Tran, Anatoly Rosenfeld, Taku Inaniwa
{"title":"Verification of linear energy transfer optimized carbon-ion radiotherapy.","authors":"Hideyuki Mizuno, Taku Nakaji, Sung Hyun Lee, Dousatsu Sakata, Katsumi Aoki, Kota Mizushima, Linh T Tran, Anatoly Rosenfeld, Taku Inaniwa","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ad8fec","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Linear energy transfer (LET) verification was conducted using a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) microdosimeter during the commissioning of LET-optimized carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT). This advanced treatment technique is expected to improve local control rates, especially in hypoxic tumors.<i>Approach.</i>An SOI microdosimeter with a cylindrical sensitive volume of 30<i>μ</i>m diameter and 5<i>μ</i>m thickness was used. Simple cubic plans and patient plans using the carbon-ion beams were created by treatment planning system, and the calculated LET<sub>d</sub>values were compared with the measured LET<sub>d</sub>values obtained by the SOI microdosimeter.<i>Main results.</i>Reasonable agreement between the measured and calculated LET<sub>d</sub>was seen in the plateau region of depth LET<sub>d</sub>profile, whereas the measured LET<sub>d</sub>were below the calculated LET<sub>d</sub>in the peak region, specifically where LET<sub>d</sub>exceeds 75 keV<i>μ</i>m<sup>-1</sup>. The discrepancy in the peak region may arise from the uncertainties in the calibration process of the SOI microdosimeter. Excluding the peak region, the average ratio and standard deviation between measured and calculated LET<sub>d</sub>values were 0.996 and 7%, respectively.<i>Significance.</i>This verification results in the initiation of clinical trials for LET-optimized CIRT at QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad8fec","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective.Linear energy transfer (LET) verification was conducted using a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) microdosimeter during the commissioning of LET-optimized carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT). This advanced treatment technique is expected to improve local control rates, especially in hypoxic tumors.Approach.An SOI microdosimeter with a cylindrical sensitive volume of 30μm diameter and 5μm thickness was used. Simple cubic plans and patient plans using the carbon-ion beams were created by treatment planning system, and the calculated LETdvalues were compared with the measured LETdvalues obtained by the SOI microdosimeter.Main results.Reasonable agreement between the measured and calculated LETdwas seen in the plateau region of depth LETdprofile, whereas the measured LETdwere below the calculated LETdin the peak region, specifically where LETdexceeds 75 keVμm-1. The discrepancy in the peak region may arise from the uncertainties in the calibration process of the SOI microdosimeter. Excluding the peak region, the average ratio and standard deviation between measured and calculated LETdvalues were 0.996 and 7%, respectively.Significance.This verification results in the initiation of clinical trials for LET-optimized CIRT at QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology.
期刊介绍:
The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry