Improved dropout prediction in group cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) using classification trees.

IF 2.6 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychotherapy Research Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1080/10503307.2025.2460327
Ashleigh G Cameron, Andrew C Page, Geoff R Hooke
{"title":"Improved dropout prediction in group cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) using classification trees.","authors":"Ashleigh G Cameron, Andrew C Page, Geoff R Hooke","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2460327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Dropout is a major factor undermining the effectiveness of psychotherapy, however, it remains poorly anticipated in clinical practice. Classification trees may offer simple, accessible, and practical solutions to identifying patients at-risk of dropout by synthesizing potentially complex patterns of relationships among intake measures.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Intake variables were collected from day-patients who attended a Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) group program at a private psychiatric hospital between 2015 and 2019. Based on these variables, two classification trees were trained and tested to predict dropout in (1) a weekly group, and (2) an intensive daily program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dropout was lower in the intensive treatment (Weekly CBT = 21.9%, Daily CBT = 13.2%), however, in both programs, the number of comorbid diagnoses was the most important factor predicting dropout. Overall balanced accuracy was comparable for both tree models, with the Weekly CBT model identifying 63.18% of dropouts successfully, and the Daily CBT model identifying dropouts with 62.06% accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest that comorbidity may be the most important factor to consider when assessing dropout risk in CBT, and that dropout can be predicted with moderate accuracy early in therapy via simple models. Furthermore, findings suggest that condensed, intensive treatments may bolster patient retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2460327","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Dropout is a major factor undermining the effectiveness of psychotherapy, however, it remains poorly anticipated in clinical practice. Classification trees may offer simple, accessible, and practical solutions to identifying patients at-risk of dropout by synthesizing potentially complex patterns of relationships among intake measures.

Method: Intake variables were collected from day-patients who attended a Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) group program at a private psychiatric hospital between 2015 and 2019. Based on these variables, two classification trees were trained and tested to predict dropout in (1) a weekly group, and (2) an intensive daily program.

Results: Dropout was lower in the intensive treatment (Weekly CBT = 21.9%, Daily CBT = 13.2%), however, in both programs, the number of comorbid diagnoses was the most important factor predicting dropout. Overall balanced accuracy was comparable for both tree models, with the Weekly CBT model identifying 63.18% of dropouts successfully, and the Daily CBT model identifying dropouts with 62.06% accuracy.

Conclusion: Findings suggest that comorbidity may be the most important factor to consider when assessing dropout risk in CBT, and that dropout can be predicted with moderate accuracy early in therapy via simple models. Furthermore, findings suggest that condensed, intensive treatments may bolster patient retention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy Research
Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.
期刊最新文献
Personalization of structured group psychotherapy through add-on interventions: A potential for active engagement. Maintaining relevance in psychodynamic psychotherapy: A novel approach to discerning between effective vs. ineffective discourse correlated with better session outcomes. "Vulnerability can breed strength": The role of borderline personality disorder severity in movement synchrony among patients with major depressive disorder. Improved dropout prediction in group cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) using classification trees. Mapping the growth of the CORE system tools in psychotherapy research from 1998 to 2021: Learning from historical evidence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1