The influence of calibration data diversity on the performance of temperature-based spring phenology models for forest tree species in Central Europe

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Agricultural and Forest Meteorology Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110302
A. Picornell , L. Caspersen , E. Luedeling
{"title":"The influence of calibration data diversity on the performance of temperature-based spring phenology models for forest tree species in Central Europe","authors":"A. Picornell ,&nbsp;L. Caspersen ,&nbsp;E. Luedeling","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global temperatures are increasing due to human-driven climate change, with notable implications for the flowering phenology of many forest tree species. Modelling the thermal requirements of these species is critical for projecting the impacts of climate change on forests and for developing appropriate adaptation strategies. Fitting models to phenological observations requires long time series of data, but such data are scarce. Researchers would benefit from combining databases from different locations to fit a single model. The aims of this study are to model the thermal requirements for flowering of the most relevant angiosperm tree species in central Europe and to determine if the accuracy of the models can be improved by limiting the geographic spread of the calibration data. To this end, we fitted the PhenoFlex phenology modelling framework using various subsets of records from the Pan-European Phenology database, which were paired with local temperature data. We used all available data for five species (<em>Acer platanoides, Alnus glutinosa, Betula pendula, Corylus avellana</em> and <em>Fraxinus excelsior</em>) to fit general thermal requirement models. We also fitted models using subsets of the dataset, limiting the calibration sets to data from climatically homogeneous regions and different geographical extents. The general models had average mean absolute errors of 8.51–15.15 days, indicating that they are effective in forecasting flowering onset for central Europe. Predictions did not improve when fitting models with data from temperature-homogeneous areas or from within small geographical extents. These findings suggest that fitting several models to cover parts of an extensive region does not necessarily perform better than fitting a single model for the whole region. This implies that including data from different locations within central Europe when calibrating models would increase the size of calibration datasets without causing a significant increase in model errors. This may help alleviate problems of data scarcity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"360 ","pages":"Article 110302"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192324004155","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global temperatures are increasing due to human-driven climate change, with notable implications for the flowering phenology of many forest tree species. Modelling the thermal requirements of these species is critical for projecting the impacts of climate change on forests and for developing appropriate adaptation strategies. Fitting models to phenological observations requires long time series of data, but such data are scarce. Researchers would benefit from combining databases from different locations to fit a single model. The aims of this study are to model the thermal requirements for flowering of the most relevant angiosperm tree species in central Europe and to determine if the accuracy of the models can be improved by limiting the geographic spread of the calibration data. To this end, we fitted the PhenoFlex phenology modelling framework using various subsets of records from the Pan-European Phenology database, which were paired with local temperature data. We used all available data for five species (Acer platanoides, Alnus glutinosa, Betula pendula, Corylus avellana and Fraxinus excelsior) to fit general thermal requirement models. We also fitted models using subsets of the dataset, limiting the calibration sets to data from climatically homogeneous regions and different geographical extents. The general models had average mean absolute errors of 8.51–15.15 days, indicating that they are effective in forecasting flowering onset for central Europe. Predictions did not improve when fitting models with data from temperature-homogeneous areas or from within small geographical extents. These findings suggest that fitting several models to cover parts of an extensive region does not necessarily perform better than fitting a single model for the whole region. This implies that including data from different locations within central Europe when calibrating models would increase the size of calibration datasets without causing a significant increase in model errors. This may help alleviate problems of data scarcity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
校准数据多样性对基于温度的中欧森林树种春季物候模型性能的影响
由于人类驱动的气候变化,全球气温不断升高,对许多森林树种的开花物候产生了显著影响。建立这些物种的热需求模型对于预测气候变化对森林的影响和制定适当的适应战略至关重要。根据物候观测结果拟合模型需要较长的时间序列数据,但此类数据非常稀缺。将不同地点的数据库结合起来以拟合一个模型,将使研究人员受益匪浅。本研究的目的是为中欧最相关的被子植物树种建立开花热需求模型,并确定是否可以通过限制校准数据的地理分布来提高模型的准确性。为此,我们利用泛欧物候数据库中的各种记录子集与当地温度数据配对,对 PhenoFlex 物候建模框架进行了拟合。我们利用五个物种(Acer platanoides、Alnus glutinosa、Betula pendula、Corylus avellana 和 Fraxinus excelsior)的所有可用数据来拟合一般热需求模型。我们还利用数据集的子集对模型进行了拟合,将校准集限制在气候相同地区和不同地理范围的数据上。一般模型的平均绝对误差为 8.51-15.15 天,表明这些模型能有效预测中欧地区的始花期。在对来自温度均匀地区或小范围地理区域的数据进行模型拟合时,预测结果并没有改善。这些研究结果表明,拟合多个模型来覆盖一个广阔区域的部分地区,并不一定比拟合一个模型来覆盖整个区域更有效。这意味着,在对模型进行校准时,将欧洲中部不同地点的数据包括在内,可以增加校准数据集的规模,而不会导致模型误差的显著增加。这可能有助于缓解数据稀缺的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
415
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published. Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.
期刊最新文献
Forest fertilization transiently increases soil CO2 efflux in young Norway spruce stands in Sweden High-frequency attenuation in eddy covariance measurements from the LI-7200 IRGA with various heating and filter configurations – a spectral correction approach The joint assimilation of satellite observed LAI and soil moisture for the global root zone soil moisture production and its impact on land surface and ecosystem variables Editorial Board Drought dimensions impact birch resistance and resilience and their determining factors across semiarid forests of northern China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1