Intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with in vitro fertilisation in patients with non-male factor infertility with low oocyte retrieval: a single-centre, retrospective cohort study.
{"title":"Intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with in vitro fertilisation in patients with non-male factor infertility with low oocyte retrieval: a single-centre, retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Shaomi Zhu, Hengli Li, Zili Lv, Xin Liang, Liang Dong, Dongmei Tian","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) on the clinical outcomes of non-male factor patients aged >35 with three or fewer oocytes retrieved.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Reproductive centre of a university-affiliated hospital in China.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>547 women with non-male factor infertility who underwent assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment with three or fewer oocytes retrieved were identified from June 2019 to May 2022. Of these 547 patients, 334 were treated with IVF and 213 with ICSI.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcomes were normal fertilisation rate, live birth rate per transfer and cumulative live birth rate per retrieval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups, except for the proportion of primary infertility, which was higher in the ICSI group (17.66% vs 32.86%, p=0.000). Compared with the IVF group, the ICSI group showed higher normal fertilisation rate and lower cycle cancellation rate (65.99% vs 76.56%, p=0.002; 33.53% vs 24.41%, p=0.023). However, no significant differences were found in clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (23.86% vs 18.92%, p=0.545), miscarriage rate per fresh embryo transfer (19.05% vs 28.57%, p=0.595), live birth rate per transfer (17.05% vs 13.51%, p=0.623), cumulative clinical pregnancy rate per retrieval (12.87% vs 11.27%, p=0.576) and cumulative live birth rate per retrieval (9.28% vs 6.57%, p=0.261) between the two groups (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In non-male factor ART cycles, ICSI was not associated with improved pregnancy outcomes in older women with a low number of oocytes retrieved. Routine use of ICSI is not recommended in older women who are infertile due to non-male factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080688","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the effects of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) on the clinical outcomes of non-male factor patients aged >35 with three or fewer oocytes retrieved.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Reproductive centre of a university-affiliated hospital in China.
Participants: 547 women with non-male factor infertility who underwent assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment with three or fewer oocytes retrieved were identified from June 2019 to May 2022. Of these 547 patients, 334 were treated with IVF and 213 with ICSI.
Outcome measures: The primary outcomes were normal fertilisation rate, live birth rate per transfer and cumulative live birth rate per retrieval.
Results: The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups, except for the proportion of primary infertility, which was higher in the ICSI group (17.66% vs 32.86%, p=0.000). Compared with the IVF group, the ICSI group showed higher normal fertilisation rate and lower cycle cancellation rate (65.99% vs 76.56%, p=0.002; 33.53% vs 24.41%, p=0.023). However, no significant differences were found in clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (23.86% vs 18.92%, p=0.545), miscarriage rate per fresh embryo transfer (19.05% vs 28.57%, p=0.595), live birth rate per transfer (17.05% vs 13.51%, p=0.623), cumulative clinical pregnancy rate per retrieval (12.87% vs 11.27%, p=0.576) and cumulative live birth rate per retrieval (9.28% vs 6.57%, p=0.261) between the two groups (p>0.05).
Conclusions: In non-male factor ART cycles, ICSI was not associated with improved pregnancy outcomes in older women with a low number of oocytes retrieved. Routine use of ICSI is not recommended in older women who are infertile due to non-male factors.
目的研究体外受精(IVF)和卵胞浆内单精子显微注射(ICSI)对年龄大于35岁、取卵细胞数少于或等于3个的非男性因素患者临床结局的影响:设计:回顾性队列研究:地点:中国某大学附属医院生殖中心:2019年6月至2022年5月期间,547名接受辅助生殖技术(ART)治疗的非男性因素不孕症女性取卵数在3个或3个以下。在这547名患者中,334人接受了体外受精治疗,213人接受了卵胞浆内单精子显微注射治疗:主要结果为正常受精率、每次移植的活产率和每次取卵的累积活产率:结果:两组患者的基线特征相当,但原发性不孕的比例在ICSI组中更高(17.66% vs 32.86%,P=0.000)。与试管婴儿组相比,ICSI 组的正常受精率更高,周期取消率更低(65.99% vs 76.56%,P=0.002;33.53% vs 24.41%,P=0.023)。然而,每次移植的临床妊娠率(23.86% vs 18.92%,p=0.545)、每次新鲜胚胎移植的流产率(19.05% vs 28.57%,p=0.595)、每次移植的活产率(17.05% vs 13.51%,p=0.623)、每次取卵的累积临床妊娠率(12.87% vs 11.27%,p=0.576)和每次取卵的累积活产率(9.28% vs 6.57%,p=0.261)两组间差异无统计学意义(p>0.05):在非男性因素抗逆转录病毒疗法周期中,对于取卵数较少的高龄女性而言,卵胞浆内单精子显微注射与妊娠结局的改善无关。对于因非男性因素导致不孕的高龄女性,不建议常规使用卵胞浆内单精子显微注射。
期刊介绍:
BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.