Barriers and facilitators to self-management of chronic conditions reported by women: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088568
Lucy Dwyer, Charlotte Barber, Dawn Dowding, Rohna Kearney
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators to self-management of chronic conditions reported by women: a systematic review of qualitative studies.","authors":"Lucy Dwyer, Charlotte Barber, Dawn Dowding, Rohna Kearney","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review aims to identify, appraise and synthesise the findings of published qualitative research exploring the barriers and facilitators to self-management of chronic conditions reported by women.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic literature review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and PsycInfo was undertaken using the search terms 'Women', 'Woman' 'Female,' 'Chronic', 'Long-term', 'Disease', 'Illness', 'Condition' 'Health,' 'Self-management,' 'Qualitative,' 'Barrier' and 'Facilitator'. A hand search for literature was also performed.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Studies published before 2005 and those not in English were excluded.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Extracted data were analysed thematically and emerging and recurring themes identified. Themes were mapped to the six components of the COM-B model. Critical appraisal of included publications was undertaken using the CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) qualitative checklist and finding weighted on quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-four publications were identified and eligible for inclusion within the review. Studies were conducted in five continents, with a focus on 20 different chronic conditions and included a total of 1788 women. Barriers and facilitators to physical capability, psychological capability, physical opportunity, social opportunity, autonomic motivation and reflective motivation were identified with a number of recurring themes found. Self-prioritisation, support and culture all had a significant impact on whether women followed self-management recommendations. Certain groups of women such as those living remotely, those with financial difficulties, migrants and those who do not speak the predominant language appear to face additional barriers to self-management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights that to self-manage chronic conditions women have to overcome various cultural, financial and social barriers. Self-management programmes should be designed taking into account these factors in order to ensure women are better supported and enabled to improve their health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088568","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This systematic review aims to identify, appraise and synthesise the findings of published qualitative research exploring the barriers and facilitators to self-management of chronic conditions reported by women.

Design: A systematic literature review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Data sources: A search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and PsycInfo was undertaken using the search terms 'Women', 'Woman' 'Female,' 'Chronic', 'Long-term', 'Disease', 'Illness', 'Condition' 'Health,' 'Self-management,' 'Qualitative,' 'Barrier' and 'Facilitator'. A hand search for literature was also performed.

Eligibility criteria: Studies published before 2005 and those not in English were excluded.

Data extraction and synthesis: Extracted data were analysed thematically and emerging and recurring themes identified. Themes were mapped to the six components of the COM-B model. Critical appraisal of included publications was undertaken using the CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) qualitative checklist and finding weighted on quality.

Results: Eighty-four publications were identified and eligible for inclusion within the review. Studies were conducted in five continents, with a focus on 20 different chronic conditions and included a total of 1788 women. Barriers and facilitators to physical capability, psychological capability, physical opportunity, social opportunity, autonomic motivation and reflective motivation were identified with a number of recurring themes found. Self-prioritisation, support and culture all had a significant impact on whether women followed self-management recommendations. Certain groups of women such as those living remotely, those with financial difficulties, migrants and those who do not speak the predominant language appear to face additional barriers to self-management.

Conclusions: This review highlights that to self-manage chronic conditions women have to overcome various cultural, financial and social barriers. Self-management programmes should be designed taking into account these factors in order to ensure women are better supported and enabled to improve their health outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇女报告的慢性病自我管理的障碍和促进因素:定性研究的系统回顾。
目的:本系统性综述旨在确定、评估和综合已发表的定性研究结果:本系统性综述旨在确定、评估和综合已发表的定性研究结果,这些定性研究探讨了女性报告的慢性病自我管理的障碍和促进因素:设计:对定性研究进行系统性文献综述和专题综合:使用 "女性"、"妇女"、"女性"、"慢性"、"长期"、"疾病"、"疾病"、"条件"、"健康"、"自我管理"、"定性"、"障碍 "和 "促进因素 "等检索词对 MEDLINE、CINAHL、Embase 和 PsycInfo 进行了检索。此外,还对文献进行了人工搜索:数据提取与综合:对提取的数据进行了专题分析,并确定了新出现和重复出现的主题。将主题与 COM-B 模型的六个组成部分进行映射。采用 CASP(批判性评估技能计划)定性检查表对纳入的出版物进行批判性评估,并根据质量对结果进行加权:结果:共发现 84 篇符合纳入审查条件的出版物。研究在五大洲进行,重点关注 20 种不同的慢性疾病,共纳入 1788 名女性。研究确定了身体能力、心理能力、身体机会、社交机会、自主动机和反思动机的障碍和促进因素,并发现了一些重复出现的主题。自我优先考虑、支持和文化都对妇女是否遵循自我管理建议有重要影响。某些妇女群体,如偏远地区的妇女、有经济困难的妇女、移民和不讲主要语言的妇女,在自我管理方面似乎面临更多障碍:本综述强调,要对慢性病进行自我管理,妇女必须克服各种文化、经济和社会障碍。自我管理计划的设计应考虑到这些因素,以确保妇女得到更好的支持,并能够改善其健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Pain during prolonged sitting in subjects with patellofemoral pain in Dutch physical therapy clinics: an online questionnaire-based analysis. Post-COVID in healthcare workers and its consequences on quality of life, activities, participation, need for rehabilitation and care experiences: protocol of a cohort study. Association between life satisfaction and health behaviours among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Determinants of inpatient satisfaction and hospital recommendation: experiences from a cross-sectional study of a tertiary general hospital in China. Development and validation of a clinical prediction tool to estimate survival in community-dwelling adults living with dementia: a protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1