Adherence to secondary antibiotic prophylaxis among patients with acute rheumatic fever and/or rheumatic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082191
Melaku Bimerew, Freweyni Gebreegziabher Araya, Manay Ayalneh
{"title":"Adherence to secondary antibiotic prophylaxis among patients with acute rheumatic fever and/or rheumatic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Melaku Bimerew, Freweyni Gebreegziabher Araya, Manay Ayalneh","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Worldwide, a number of studies have been conducted to assess the prevalence of adherence to secondary antibiotic prophylaxis and to identify the associated factors (reasons) for poor adherence among patients with rheumatic heart disease or acute rheumatic fever (RHD/ARF). However, results were highly inconsistent with a prevalence ranging from 10% to 93%; and the reported reasons or associated factors have not been systematically reviewed. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of adherence to secondary antibiotic prophylaxis among patients with RHD/ARF; and to review the associated factors (reasons) for poor adherence.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, Cochrane Review and African Journals Online databases.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Articles published in English from 1 January 2005 to 1 December 2022 and reported the prevalence of adherence using ≥80% cut-off points were included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Data were extracted using the Microsoft Excel and analysed by STATA V.11.0. A meta-analysis was conducted using the weighted inverse-variance random-effects model. Reasons for poor adherence were identified through thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>33 articles with a total sample size of 7158 patients were included. The pooled prevalence of adherence to secondary antibiotic prophylaxis among patients with RHD/ARF was found to be 58.5% (95% CI: 48.2% to 68.7%; I<sup>2</sup>=99.2%; p<0.001). Rural residency, lack of money, distance from the health institutions, inaccessibility, poor counselling, forgetting schedules, lack of disease knowledge and fear of injection pain were the reported factors or reasons for poor adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>About 41.5% of patients with RHD/ARF were found to have poor adherence. Long distance from health institutions, forgetting schedules, poor counselling and lack of knowledge and skill among healthcare workers were some of the modifiable reasons for poor adherence. Therefore, decentralisation of the follow-up care, creating schedule reminding systems and providing targeted health education might help to improve adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082191","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Worldwide, a number of studies have been conducted to assess the prevalence of adherence to secondary antibiotic prophylaxis and to identify the associated factors (reasons) for poor adherence among patients with rheumatic heart disease or acute rheumatic fever (RHD/ARF). However, results were highly inconsistent with a prevalence ranging from 10% to 93%; and the reported reasons or associated factors have not been systematically reviewed. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of adherence to secondary antibiotic prophylaxis among patients with RHD/ARF; and to review the associated factors (reasons) for poor adherence.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources: PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, Cochrane Review and African Journals Online databases.

Eligibility criteria: Articles published in English from 1 January 2005 to 1 December 2022 and reported the prevalence of adherence using ≥80% cut-off points were included.

Data extraction and synthesis: Data were extracted using the Microsoft Excel and analysed by STATA V.11.0. A meta-analysis was conducted using the weighted inverse-variance random-effects model. Reasons for poor adherence were identified through thematic analysis.

Results: 33 articles with a total sample size of 7158 patients were included. The pooled prevalence of adherence to secondary antibiotic prophylaxis among patients with RHD/ARF was found to be 58.5% (95% CI: 48.2% to 68.7%; I2=99.2%; p<0.001). Rural residency, lack of money, distance from the health institutions, inaccessibility, poor counselling, forgetting schedules, lack of disease knowledge and fear of injection pain were the reported factors or reasons for poor adherence.

Conclusion: About 41.5% of patients with RHD/ARF were found to have poor adherence. Long distance from health institutions, forgetting schedules, poor counselling and lack of knowledge and skill among healthcare workers were some of the modifiable reasons for poor adherence. Therefore, decentralisation of the follow-up care, creating schedule reminding systems and providing targeted health education might help to improve adherence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性风湿热和/或风湿性心脏病患者坚持二次抗生素预防治疗:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
研究目的世界范围内已开展了多项研究,以评估风湿性心脏病或急性风湿热(RHD/ARF)患者坚持二次抗生素预防治疗的普遍性,并找出导致患者不能坚持治疗的相关因素(原因)。然而,研究结果极不一致,患病率从 10% 到 93% 不等;而且报告的原因或相关因素尚未经过系统审查。因此,本研究旨在评估RHD/ARF患者对二次抗生素预防的依从性;并回顾依从性差的相关因素(原因):设计:系统回顾和荟萃分析:数据来源:PubMed/Medline、Google Scholar、Cochrane Review 和 African Journals Online 数据库:数据提取和综合:使用 Microsoft Excel 提取数据,并使用 STATA V.11.0 进行分析。采用加权逆方差随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。通过专题分析确定了依从性差的原因:共纳入 33 篇文章,样本量共计 7158 名患者。结果发现,RHD/ARF患者坚持二次抗生素预防治疗的总体流行率为58.5%(95% CI:48.2%至68.7%;I2=99.2%;P结论:发现约41.5%的RHD/ARF患者依从性较差。距离医疗机构较远、忘记时间安排、辅导不到位以及医护人员缺乏知识和技能是导致患者依从性差的一些可改变的原因。因此,分散随访护理、建立日程提醒系统和提供有针对性的健康教育可能有助于提高依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Pain during prolonged sitting in subjects with patellofemoral pain in Dutch physical therapy clinics: an online questionnaire-based analysis. Post-COVID in healthcare workers and its consequences on quality of life, activities, participation, need for rehabilitation and care experiences: protocol of a cohort study. Association between life satisfaction and health behaviours among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Determinants of inpatient satisfaction and hospital recommendation: experiences from a cross-sectional study of a tertiary general hospital in China. Development and validation of a clinical prediction tool to estimate survival in community-dwelling adults living with dementia: a protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1