Oxygen extraction-guided transfusion strategy in critically ill patients: study protocol for a randomised, open-labelled, controlled trial.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089910
Alberto Fogagnolo, Danila Azzolina, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Emma Pedarzani, Gianluca Pasa, Daniele Marianello, Giorgia Valpiani, Chiara Marchesini, Filippo Annoni, Anthony Moureau, Carlo Alberto Volta, Federico Franchi, Savino Spadaro
{"title":"Oxygen extraction-guided transfusion strategy in critically ill patients: study protocol for a randomised, open-labelled, controlled trial.","authors":"Alberto Fogagnolo, Danila Azzolina, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Emma Pedarzani, Gianluca Pasa, Daniele Marianello, Giorgia Valpiani, Chiara Marchesini, Filippo Annoni, Anthony Moureau, Carlo Alberto Volta, Federico Franchi, Savino Spadaro","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In critically ill patients, individualised strategies for red blood cell transfusion (RBCT) are lacking. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the potential advantages of employing an individualised transfusion strategy compared with a restrictive approach, in unselected intensive care unit (ICU) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This will be a randomised, multicentre, international trial. Two open-label parallel groups will be compared with an allocation ratio of 1:1. The trial is designed to investigate the superiority of the individualised intervention group compared with the standard intervention group. The study will be performed in three mixed, academic ICUs located in two different countries. In the individualised group, prescription of RCBT is restricted to patients who present haemoglobin (Hb) ≤9.0 g/dL and oxygen extraction ratio (O<sub>2</sub>ER) ≥ 30%, for a minimum Hb value of ≤6.0 g/dL. In the control group, prescription of RBCT is guided by thresholds proposed by recent guidelines, regardless of O<sub>2</sub>ER values.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>This trial is approved by the Comitato Etico Area Vasta Centro della Regione Emilia-Romagna (protocol number 350/2023/Sper/AOUFe/PRBCT, date of approval 18/05/2023) and ethic boards at all participating sites. Our results will be published and shared with relevant organisations and healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov NCT06102590.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089910","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In critically ill patients, individualised strategies for red blood cell transfusion (RBCT) are lacking. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the potential advantages of employing an individualised transfusion strategy compared with a restrictive approach, in unselected intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

Methods: This will be a randomised, multicentre, international trial. Two open-label parallel groups will be compared with an allocation ratio of 1:1. The trial is designed to investigate the superiority of the individualised intervention group compared with the standard intervention group. The study will be performed in three mixed, academic ICUs located in two different countries. In the individualised group, prescription of RCBT is restricted to patients who present haemoglobin (Hb) ≤9.0 g/dL and oxygen extraction ratio (O2ER) ≥ 30%, for a minimum Hb value of ≤6.0 g/dL. In the control group, prescription of RBCT is guided by thresholds proposed by recent guidelines, regardless of O2ER values.

Ethics and dissemination: This trial is approved by the Comitato Etico Area Vasta Centro della Regione Emilia-Romagna (protocol number 350/2023/Sper/AOUFe/PRBCT, date of approval 18/05/2023) and ethic boards at all participating sites. Our results will be published and shared with relevant organisations and healthcare professionals.

Trial registration number: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT06102590.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症患者以抽氧为指导的输血策略:随机、开放标签对照试验的研究方案。
导言:在重症患者中,缺乏个性化的红细胞输注(RBCT)策略。本研究的目的是在未经选择的重症监护病房(ICU)患者中,证明采用个体化输血策略与限制性输血策略相比的潜在优势:方法:这将是一项随机、多中心的国际试验。方法:这将是一项随机、多中心、国际性试验,将对两个开放标签平行组进行比较,分配比例为 1:1。试验旨在研究个性化干预组与标准干预组相比的优越性。研究将在两个不同国家的三家混合型学术重症监护病房进行。在个体化干预组中,RCBT 的处方仅限于血红蛋白(Hb)≤9.0 g/dL 和氧萃取率(O2ER)≥30% 的患者,最低 Hb 值为≤6.0 g/dL。在对照组中,RBCT 的处方以近期指南提出的阈值为指导,与 O2ER 值无关:本试验已获得艾米利亚-罗马涅大区Comitato Etico Area Vasta Centro(协议编号350/2023/Sper/AOUFe/PRBCT,批准日期2023年5月18日)和所有参与研究机构的伦理委员会的批准。我们的研究结果将公布于众,并与相关机构和医护人员分享:试验注册号:Clinicaltrials.gov NCT06102590。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Pain during prolonged sitting in subjects with patellofemoral pain in Dutch physical therapy clinics: an online questionnaire-based analysis. Post-COVID in healthcare workers and its consequences on quality of life, activities, participation, need for rehabilitation and care experiences: protocol of a cohort study. Association between life satisfaction and health behaviours among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Determinants of inpatient satisfaction and hospital recommendation: experiences from a cross-sectional study of a tertiary general hospital in China. Development and validation of a clinical prediction tool to estimate survival in community-dwelling adults living with dementia: a protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1