Lessons Learned: Risk Factors and Clinical Impact of Severe Pneumothorax After Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction With Endobronchial Valves.

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Chest Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.045
Judith Maria Brock, Susanne Annemarie Dittrich, Florian Eichhorn, Kai Schlamp, Konstantina Kontogianni, Felix J F Herth
{"title":"Lessons Learned: Risk Factors and Clinical Impact of Severe Pneumothorax After Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction With Endobronchial Valves.","authors":"Judith Maria Brock, Susanne Annemarie Dittrich, Florian Eichhorn, Kai Schlamp, Konstantina Kontogianni, Felix J F Herth","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pneumothorax is a major complication after endoscopic lung volume reduction with valves, with a prevalence of up to 34%. Although some patients benefit from valve implantation despite pneumothorax, others are significantly impaired after lung collapse.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>What are the differences in the severity grades of pneumothorax and how do these affect clinical practice?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study analyzed patients undergoing endoscopic valve implantation with and without pneumothorax after intervention. Emphysema characteristics, collateral ventilation, management, and outcome of patients with pneumothorax 3 months after valve implantation were assessed. Pneumothorax was categorized as severe (chest tube insertion, prolonged air leak requiring valve removal), moderate (chest tube, no valve removal), and mild (no chest tube).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pneumothorax occurred in 102 of 532 patients (19%) and was significantly more common after valve placement in the upper lobes (31.3%) compared with the lower lobes (11.3%; P < .001). Fissure integrity was significantly higher in patients with pneumothorax (mean, 96.6 ± 6.3% vs 93.4 ± 10.3%; P = .002). Of all pneumothoraces, 30.4% were mild, 30.4% were moderate, and 39.2% were severe. Severe pneumothorax caused multiple complications and prolonged hospitalization. Valve placement in the left upper lobe and a larger size of the target lobe were identified as risk factors for severe pneumothorax. Patients with pneumothorax demonstrated complete lobar atelectasis in > 60% as a sign of therapeutic success, but obviously only when valves could be left in place or reimplanted. However, valve reimplantation resulted in repeat pneumothorax in 42.9%.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Patients could be informed more individually about their risk of pneumothorax, which varies with target lobe location, fissure integrity, and reimplantation. The poor outcome and high complication rate of severe pneumothorax calls for future research into the prediction of severe pneumothorax.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":"1012-1023"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12001813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.045","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pneumothorax is a major complication after endoscopic lung volume reduction with valves, with a prevalence of up to 34%. Although some patients benefit from valve implantation despite pneumothorax, others are significantly impaired after lung collapse.

Research question: What are the differences in the severity grades of pneumothorax and how do these affect clinical practice?

Study design and methods: This single-center retrospective study analyzed patients undergoing endoscopic valve implantation with and without pneumothorax after intervention. Emphysema characteristics, collateral ventilation, management, and outcome of patients with pneumothorax 3 months after valve implantation were assessed. Pneumothorax was categorized as severe (chest tube insertion, prolonged air leak requiring valve removal), moderate (chest tube, no valve removal), and mild (no chest tube).

Results: Pneumothorax occurred in 102 of 532 patients (19%) and was significantly more common after valve placement in the upper lobes (31.3%) compared with the lower lobes (11.3%; P < .001). Fissure integrity was significantly higher in patients with pneumothorax (mean, 96.6 ± 6.3% vs 93.4 ± 10.3%; P = .002). Of all pneumothoraces, 30.4% were mild, 30.4% were moderate, and 39.2% were severe. Severe pneumothorax caused multiple complications and prolonged hospitalization. Valve placement in the left upper lobe and a larger size of the target lobe were identified as risk factors for severe pneumothorax. Patients with pneumothorax demonstrated complete lobar atelectasis in > 60% as a sign of therapeutic success, but obviously only when valves could be left in place or reimplanted. However, valve reimplantation resulted in repeat pneumothorax in 42.9%.

Interpretation: Patients could be informed more individually about their risk of pneumothorax, which varies with target lobe location, fissure integrity, and reimplantation. The poor outcome and high complication rate of severe pneumothorax calls for future research into the prediction of severe pneumothorax.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经验教训:使用支气管内瓣膜进行内窥镜肺容积缩小术后出现严重气胸的风险因素和临床影响。
背景:气胸是使用瓣膜进行内窥镜肺容积缩小术后的主要并发症,发生率高达 34%。有些患者尽管存在气胸,但仍能从瓣膜植入术中获益,而另一些患者则在肺塌陷后严重受损:研究设计和方法:这项单中心回顾性研究分析了接受内窥镜瓣膜植入术并伴有和不伴有介入后气胸的患者。评估了气胸患者的肺气肿特征、辅助通气、处理方法以及瓣膜植入术后 3 个月的预后。气胸分为 "重度气胸"(插入胸管,长时间漏气需要移除瓣膜)、"中度气胸"(插入胸管,不移除瓣膜)和 "轻度气胸"(不插入胸管):102/532 例患者(19%)发生气胸,与下叶(11.3%,P < 0.001)相比,上叶(31.3%)置入瓣膜后发生气胸的比例明显更高。气胸患者的裂隙完整性明显更高(平均为 96.6 ± 6.3 % 对 93.4 ± 10.3 %,p = 0.002)。在所有气胸中,30.4% 为轻度,30.4% 为中度,39.2% 为重度。重度气胸会导致多种并发症和住院时间延长。瓣膜置入左上肺叶和目标肺叶面积较大被认为是导致严重气胸的危险因素。60%以上的气胸患者会出现完全性肺叶偏流,这是治疗成功的标志,但显然只有当瓣膜可以留在原位或再次植入时才会出现这种情况。然而,42.9%的患者在重新植入瓣膜后再次出现气胸:解释:患者应更多地了解其气胸风险,气胸风险因靶叶位置、裂隙完整性和再次植入而异。严重气胸的治疗效果差、并发症发生率高,因此今后需要对严重气胸的预测进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
期刊最新文献
Impact of pre-existing schizophrenia spectrum disorder on the receipt of surgery and other treatments for non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter nationwide cohort study in Japan. COPD Trial Evidence Comes from a Narrow Slice of the World: A Population Representativeness Analysis. Dietary patterns and asthma endotypes in Puerto Rican youth. Evolving Concepts in Pulmonary Hypertension: Implementation challenges of the current guidelines and proceedings in the US. Natural history, treatment, survival, and causes of mortality in patients with subsolid and ground-glass nodules.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1