Final diagnoses and mortality rates in ambulance patients administered nebulized β2-agonists bronchodilators.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Internal and Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1007/s11739-024-03795-1
Victor Hagenau, Mathilde G Mulvad, Jan B Valentin, Arne S R Jensen, Martin F Gude
{"title":"Final diagnoses and mortality rates in ambulance patients administered nebulized β2-agonists bronchodilators.","authors":"Victor Hagenau, Mathilde G Mulvad, Jan B Valentin, Arne S R Jensen, Martin F Gude","doi":"10.1007/s11739-024-03795-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To assess final diagnoses and mortality rates (30 day and 1 year) in patients treated with the inhaled bronchodilator salbutamol by ambulance personnel, and to establish its role as an identifier of moderate to severe respiratory distress in the prehospital phase of treatment. In a descriptive retrospective observational study, patients experiencing respiratory distress and treated with inhaled bronchodilators, specifically salbutamol, in the prehospital setting within the Central Denmark Region during 2018-2019 were included. The study included 6318 ambulance transports, comprising 3686 cases of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), 234 with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), 320 with heart disease (HD), 233 adults with asthma, 1674 with various other primary ICD-10 diagnoses (other ≥ 18 years), and 171 patients under 18 years. The 30 day mortality rate for all patients was 10.7% (95% CI 9.8-11.6), with zero deaths within 30 days among adults with asthma and those under 18. Excluding low mortality groups, AECOPD patients had the lowest 30 day mortality at 10.2% (95% CI 9.1-11.3), and HD patients the highest at 15.3% (95% CI 10.6-19.9). The 1-year overall mortality rate increased to 32.1% (95% CI 30.2-34.0), with mortality staying low for asthma and under-18 groups, while differences between other groups lessened and became insignificant. Patients requiring inhaled bronchodilator treatment in ambulances exhibit notably high mortality rates at 30 days and 1 year, except for those with asthma or under 18. The need for prehospital bronchodilators could serve as a clear and unmistakable marker for moderate to severe respiratory distress, enabling early intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03795-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To assess final diagnoses and mortality rates (30 day and 1 year) in patients treated with the inhaled bronchodilator salbutamol by ambulance personnel, and to establish its role as an identifier of moderate to severe respiratory distress in the prehospital phase of treatment. In a descriptive retrospective observational study, patients experiencing respiratory distress and treated with inhaled bronchodilators, specifically salbutamol, in the prehospital setting within the Central Denmark Region during 2018-2019 were included. The study included 6318 ambulance transports, comprising 3686 cases of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), 234 with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), 320 with heart disease (HD), 233 adults with asthma, 1674 with various other primary ICD-10 diagnoses (other ≥ 18 years), and 171 patients under 18 years. The 30 day mortality rate for all patients was 10.7% (95% CI 9.8-11.6), with zero deaths within 30 days among adults with asthma and those under 18. Excluding low mortality groups, AECOPD patients had the lowest 30 day mortality at 10.2% (95% CI 9.1-11.3), and HD patients the highest at 15.3% (95% CI 10.6-19.9). The 1-year overall mortality rate increased to 32.1% (95% CI 30.2-34.0), with mortality staying low for asthma and under-18 groups, while differences between other groups lessened and became insignificant. Patients requiring inhaled bronchodilator treatment in ambulances exhibit notably high mortality rates at 30 days and 1 year, except for those with asthma or under 18. The need for prehospital bronchodilators could serve as a clear and unmistakable marker for moderate to severe respiratory distress, enabling early intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用雾化 β2-激动剂支气管扩张剂的救护车病人的最终诊断和死亡率。
目的:评估救护人员使用吸入式支气管扩张剂沙丁胺醇治疗患者的最终诊断和死亡率(30 天和 1 年),并确定沙丁胺醇在院前治疗阶段作为中度至重度呼吸窘迫标识物的作用。在一项描述性回顾观察研究中,纳入了2018-2019年期间在丹麦中部地区院前环境中经历呼吸窘迫并接受吸入性支气管扩张剂(特别是沙丁胺醇)治疗的患者。研究共纳入 6318 次救护车转运,其中包括 3686 例慢性阻塞性肺疾病(AECOPD)急性加重患者、234 例社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者、320 例心脏病患者、233 例成人哮喘患者、1674 例各种其他 ICD-10 主要诊断(其他≥ 18 岁)患者和 171 例 18 岁以下患者。所有患者的 30 天死亡率为 10.7%(95% CI 9.8-11.6),其中哮喘成人患者和 18 岁以下患者 30 天内的死亡率为零。除去低死亡率群体,AECOPD 患者的 30 天死亡率最低,为 10.2% (95% CI 9.1-11.3),而 HD 患者的 30 天死亡率最高,为 15.3% (95% CI 10.6-19.9)。1年总死亡率上升至32.1%(95% CI 30.2-34.0),哮喘组和18岁以下组的死亡率保持在较低水平,而其他组之间的差异有所缩小,变得不明显。在救护车上需要吸入支气管扩张剂治疗的患者在30天和1年后的死亡率明显较高,但哮喘患者和18岁以下患者除外。需要使用院前支气管扩张剂可作为中度至重度呼吸窘迫的一个明确无误的标志,从而实现早期干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Internal and Emergency Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Chronic treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors is associated with ICU admission and disease severity in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: a propensity score-matched cohort study. Out-of-hospital onset versus in-hospital onset for clinical outcomes in spontaneous intramuscular hematoma diagnosed by computed tomography: a retrospective cohort study. Comparing self-rated health among exclusive e-cigarette users and traditional cigarette smokers: an analysis of the Health Survey for England 2019. Final diagnoses and mortality rates in ambulance patients administered nebulized β2-agonists bronchodilators. Efficacy of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy in cancer patients with concurrent acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a retrospective propensity score study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1