Ellene Yan HBSc , Nina Butris MSc , Yasmin Alhamdah MSc , Paras Kapoor MSc , Leif Erik Lovblom PhD , Jean Wong MD , Sazzadul Islam MSc , Aparna Saripella MSc , David F. Tang-Wai MD CM , Linda Mah MD MHSc , Shabbir M.H. Alibhai MD MSc , David He MD PhD , Frances Chung MD
{"title":"Evaluating prevalence and trajectory of functional disability in older surgical patients: An observational cohort study","authors":"Ellene Yan HBSc , Nina Butris MSc , Yasmin Alhamdah MSc , Paras Kapoor MSc , Leif Erik Lovblom PhD , Jean Wong MD , Sazzadul Islam MSc , Aparna Saripella MSc , David F. Tang-Wai MD CM , Linda Mah MD MHSc , Shabbir M.H. Alibhai MD MSc , David He MD PhD , Frances Chung MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objectives</h3><div>To (1) estimate the prevalence and trajectory of functional disability exceeding patient-acceptable and clinically significant levels in older surgical patients preoperatively and at 30, 90, and 180 days postoperatively, (2) identify risk factors associated with postoperative functional disability, and (3) compare adverse clinical outcomes between participants with and without functional disability.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Multicenter prospective study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Remote preoperative and postoperative assessments.</div></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><div>307 older patients aged ≥65 years undergoing non-cardiac surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><div>Functional disability was assessed using the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 on an online survey, with a score ≥ 16 % exceeding a patient-acceptable symptom state and ≥ 35 % indicating significant, or at least moderate, severity.</div></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><div>We found that 133 (43 %) patients exhibited preoperative functional disability exceeding a patient-acceptable level, with 42 (14 %) experiencing clinically significant, or at least moderate, functional disability. The Functional Disability group showed greater improvement in function than the No-disability group. Specifically, over 60 % of participants in the Functional Disability group showed significant improvement at 90 and 180 days postoperatively, with 40 % being disability-free. However, 12 % of the Functional Disability group and 9 % of the No-disability group experienced a clinically important worsening in functional disability at 180 days postoperatively. Preoperative functional disability and depression were associated with nearly 6- and 4-fold higher odds of functional disability at 180 days, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with preoperative functional disability experienced greater postoperative improvement in functional disability than the No-disability group. Preoperative evaluation of functional disability informs perioperative care and recovery for patients and clinicians.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 111681"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024003106","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study objectives
To (1) estimate the prevalence and trajectory of functional disability exceeding patient-acceptable and clinically significant levels in older surgical patients preoperatively and at 30, 90, and 180 days postoperatively, (2) identify risk factors associated with postoperative functional disability, and (3) compare adverse clinical outcomes between participants with and without functional disability.
Design
Multicenter prospective study.
Setting
Remote preoperative and postoperative assessments.
Patients
307 older patients aged ≥65 years undergoing non-cardiac surgery.
Measurements
Functional disability was assessed using the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 on an online survey, with a score ≥ 16 % exceeding a patient-acceptable symptom state and ≥ 35 % indicating significant, or at least moderate, severity.
Main results
We found that 133 (43 %) patients exhibited preoperative functional disability exceeding a patient-acceptable level, with 42 (14 %) experiencing clinically significant, or at least moderate, functional disability. The Functional Disability group showed greater improvement in function than the No-disability group. Specifically, over 60 % of participants in the Functional Disability group showed significant improvement at 90 and 180 days postoperatively, with 40 % being disability-free. However, 12 % of the Functional Disability group and 9 % of the No-disability group experienced a clinically important worsening in functional disability at 180 days postoperatively. Preoperative functional disability and depression were associated with nearly 6- and 4-fold higher odds of functional disability at 180 days, respectively.
Conclusions
Patients with preoperative functional disability experienced greater postoperative improvement in functional disability than the No-disability group. Preoperative evaluation of functional disability informs perioperative care and recovery for patients and clinicians.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained.
The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.