Healthcare workers’ knowledge and preparedness for unprecedented foodborne botulism outbreak in Saudi Arabia

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Infection and Public Health Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jiph.2024.102584
Abdullah Alhuzaimi , Fatimah S. Alshahrani , Fadi Aljamaan , Fatema H. AL-Ajwad , Ibraheem Altamimi , Abdullah Bukhari , Lama Al-Eyadhy , Sarah Al-Subaie , Nasser S. Alharbi , Mazin Barry , Yamen Shayah , Amr Jamal , Alaa A. Alanteet , Khalid Alhasan , Sameera M. Aljuhani , Jaffar A. Al-Tawfiq , Mohamad-Hani Temsah
{"title":"Healthcare workers’ knowledge and preparedness for unprecedented foodborne botulism outbreak in Saudi Arabia","authors":"Abdullah Alhuzaimi ,&nbsp;Fatimah S. Alshahrani ,&nbsp;Fadi Aljamaan ,&nbsp;Fatema H. AL-Ajwad ,&nbsp;Ibraheem Altamimi ,&nbsp;Abdullah Bukhari ,&nbsp;Lama Al-Eyadhy ,&nbsp;Sarah Al-Subaie ,&nbsp;Nasser S. Alharbi ,&nbsp;Mazin Barry ,&nbsp;Yamen Shayah ,&nbsp;Amr Jamal ,&nbsp;Alaa A. Alanteet ,&nbsp;Khalid Alhasan ,&nbsp;Sameera M. Aljuhani ,&nbsp;Jaffar A. Al-Tawfiq ,&nbsp;Mohamad-Hani Temsah","doi":"10.1016/j.jiph.2024.102584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The recent unprecedented foodborne botulism outbreak in Saudi Arabia necessitated an assessment of healthcare workers' (HCWs) knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP). This study assessed healthcare workers' knowledge regarding the transmission, contagiousness, presentation, and diagnosis of foodborne botulism, as well as their management practices, including contacting public health authorities, administering antitoxin, preparedness to respond to botulism cases and consulting generative Artificial Intelligent (AI)-chatbots, like ChatGPT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional online survey targeting Saudi HCWs was conducted from May 6–19, 2024, following the first foodborne botulism outbreak. The survey, developed by infectious disease and public health experts according to the Saudi Public Health Authority (SPHA) botulism guidelines, covered several sections: demographics, knowledge about foodborne botulism, attitudes and perceptions, intended practices, and worry level. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, multivariable linear regression to assess factors influencing knowledge, and multivariable logistic binary regression to evaluate factors affecting confidence in handling botulism.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 1058 participants, the knowledge score was 9.69/20 (48.4 % correct ± 18 %), with higher scores among HCWs working in tertiary centers, older than 34 years, reading SPHA botulism protocol, and using scientific journals as main information sources. HCWs consulting ChatGPT had significantly lower knowledge scores (p-value &lt; 0.001). HCWs displayed highly intended practices in managing botulism, with a mean score of 4.10/5. The self-rated management confidence was moderate (2.84 ± 1.05 out of 5-points). Multivariable logistic binary regression showed that previous experience with botulism and reading SPHA protocol were the most significant factors associated with a higher management confidence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study highlights significant HCWs’ knowledge gaps during unprecedented foodborne botulism outbreak. Previous experience with botulism cases and reading recent guidelines were associated with higher knowledge and confidence, while reliance on ChatGPT was linked to lower scores. This study emphasizes the importance of timely publishing local guidelines to favorably affect both knowledge and confidence to deal with infectious outbreaks. Future research should evaluate long-term effectiveness of educational interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection and Public Health","volume":"17 12","pages":"Article 102584"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876034124003186","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The recent unprecedented foodborne botulism outbreak in Saudi Arabia necessitated an assessment of healthcare workers' (HCWs) knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP). This study assessed healthcare workers' knowledge regarding the transmission, contagiousness, presentation, and diagnosis of foodborne botulism, as well as their management practices, including contacting public health authorities, administering antitoxin, preparedness to respond to botulism cases and consulting generative Artificial Intelligent (AI)-chatbots, like ChatGPT.

Methods

A cross-sectional online survey targeting Saudi HCWs was conducted from May 6–19, 2024, following the first foodborne botulism outbreak. The survey, developed by infectious disease and public health experts according to the Saudi Public Health Authority (SPHA) botulism guidelines, covered several sections: demographics, knowledge about foodborne botulism, attitudes and perceptions, intended practices, and worry level. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, multivariable linear regression to assess factors influencing knowledge, and multivariable logistic binary regression to evaluate factors affecting confidence in handling botulism.

Results

Among the 1058 participants, the knowledge score was 9.69/20 (48.4 % correct ± 18 %), with higher scores among HCWs working in tertiary centers, older than 34 years, reading SPHA botulism protocol, and using scientific journals as main information sources. HCWs consulting ChatGPT had significantly lower knowledge scores (p-value < 0.001). HCWs displayed highly intended practices in managing botulism, with a mean score of 4.10/5. The self-rated management confidence was moderate (2.84 ± 1.05 out of 5-points). Multivariable logistic binary regression showed that previous experience with botulism and reading SPHA protocol were the most significant factors associated with a higher management confidence.

Conclusions

This study highlights significant HCWs’ knowledge gaps during unprecedented foodborne botulism outbreak. Previous experience with botulism cases and reading recent guidelines were associated with higher knowledge and confidence, while reliance on ChatGPT was linked to lower scores. This study emphasizes the importance of timely publishing local guidelines to favorably affect both knowledge and confidence to deal with infectious outbreaks. Future research should evaluate long-term effectiveness of educational interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特阿拉伯医护人员对史无前例的食源性肉毒杆菌疫情的了解和准备情况。
背景:沙特阿拉伯最近爆发了史无前例的食源性肉毒中毒疫情,因此有必要对医护人员(HCWs)的知识、态度和实践(KAP)进行评估。本研究评估了医护人员对食源性肉毒中毒的传播、传染性、表现和诊断的认识,以及他们的管理实践,包括联系公共卫生机构、注射抗毒素、做好应对肉毒中毒病例的准备以及咨询生成式人工智能(AI)聊天机器人(如 ChatGPT):在首次食源性肉毒杆菌疫情爆发后,我们于 2024 年 5 月 6 日至 19 日开展了一项针对沙特医护人员的横断面在线调查。该调查由传染病和公共卫生专家根据沙特公共卫生局(SPHA)肉毒中毒指南制定,包括几个部分:人口统计学、食源性肉毒中毒知识、态度和看法、预期做法和担忧程度。统计分析包括描述性统计、多变量线性回归以评估影响知识的因素,以及多变量逻辑二元回归以评估影响处理肉毒中毒信心的因素:在1058名参与者中,知识得分为9.69/20(48.4%正确±18%),其中在三级中心工作、年龄大于34岁、阅读SPHA肉毒中毒协议、以科学杂志为主要信息来源的HCW得分较高。咨询 ChatGPT 的医护人员的知识得分明显较低(P 值 < 0.001)。医护人员在肉毒中毒管理方面表现出较高的意愿,平均得分为 4.10/5。自评的管理信心为中等(2.84 ± 1.05,满分为 5 分)。多变量逻辑二元回归显示,以前处理肉毒中毒的经验和阅读 SPHA 协议是与较高管理信心相关的最重要因素:本研究强调了在前所未有的食源性肉毒杆菌疫情爆发期间,医护人员的知识缺口很大。以前处理肉毒杆菌病例的经验和阅读最新指南与较高的知识和信心有关,而依赖 ChatGPT 则与较低的得分有关。这项研究强调了及时发布当地指南的重要性,这将对处理传染病爆发的知识和信心产生有利影响。未来的研究应评估教育干预措施的长期有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Infection and Public Health
Journal of Infection and Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.50%
发文量
203
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection and Public Health, first official journal of the Saudi Arabian Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences and the Saudi Association for Public Health, aims to be the foremost scientific, peer-reviewed journal encompassing infection prevention and control, microbiology, infectious diseases, public health and the application of healthcare epidemiology to the evaluation of health outcomes. The point of view of the journal is that infection and public health are closely intertwined and that advances in one area will have positive consequences on the other. The journal will be useful to all health professionals who are partners in the management of patients with communicable diseases, keeping them up to date. The journal is proud to have an international and diverse editorial board that will assist and facilitate the publication of articles that reflect a global view on infection control and public health, as well as emphasizing our focus on supporting the needs of public health practitioners. It is our aim to improve healthcare by reducing risk of infection and related adverse outcomes by critical review, selection, and dissemination of new and relevant information in the field of infection control, public health and infectious diseases in all healthcare settings and the community.
期刊最新文献
Unraveling influenza sentinel surveillance in Pakistan 2008-2024: Epidemiological insights during the pre and post pandemic period of COVID-19. Emergence of multidrug-resistant E. coli ST8346 isolates carrying three distinct plasmids with NDM-5, KPC-2, and OXA-181. Antibiotic residues in poultry products and bacterial resistance: A review in developing countries Seroprevalence and detection of Human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8) among healthy blood donors residing in Qatar Epidemiological and typing features of HPV co-infections in MSM with mpox: A hospital-based prospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1