The importance of combined use of spacing and testing effects for complex skills training: A quasi-experimental study.

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Teacher Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2024.2427735
Renata Vicente Soares, Rafaela Batista Dos Santos Pedrosa, John Sandars, Dario Cecilio-Fernandes
{"title":"The importance of combined use of spacing and testing effects for complex skills training: A quasi-experimental study.","authors":"Renata Vicente Soares, Rafaela Batista Dos Santos Pedrosa, John Sandars, Dario Cecilio-Fernandes","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2427735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A major challenge is retention of complex clinical skills. Spacing training and testing have been demonstrated to increase knowledge and skill retention but the combination has not been previously investigated in complex clinical skills. The aim of our study was to compare the effectiveness of combined spacing and testing for Basic Life Support (BLS) and Advance Life Support (ALS) simulation training in one group (intervention group), with combined spacing and testing, and another group (control) that received simulation training in a single-session simulation training without testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen nursing students were in the intervention group and 18 in the control group. After three months, there was no significant reduction in retention of BLS knowledge (<i>p</i> > 0.05) or BLS skills (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the intervention group, but there was a significant reduction in both (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the control group. We found no significant reduction in retention of ALS knowledge in the control group (<i>p</i> > 0.05), but there was a significant reduction in the intervention group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There was no significant decay of ALS skills in both groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This is the first study to demonstrate that combined spacing and testing could be highly effective for complex skills simulation training to increase retention after three months.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2427735","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A major challenge is retention of complex clinical skills. Spacing training and testing have been demonstrated to increase knowledge and skill retention but the combination has not been previously investigated in complex clinical skills. The aim of our study was to compare the effectiveness of combined spacing and testing for Basic Life Support (BLS) and Advance Life Support (ALS) simulation training in one group (intervention group), with combined spacing and testing, and another group (control) that received simulation training in a single-session simulation training without testing.

Methods: A quasi-experimental study.

Results: Thirteen nursing students were in the intervention group and 18 in the control group. After three months, there was no significant reduction in retention of BLS knowledge (p > 0.05) or BLS skills (p < 0.05) in the intervention group, but there was a significant reduction in both (p < 0.05) in the control group. We found no significant reduction in retention of ALS knowledge in the control group (p > 0.05), but there was a significant reduction in the intervention group (p < 0.05). There was no significant decay of ALS skills in both groups (p < 0.05).

Discussion: This is the first study to demonstrate that combined spacing and testing could be highly effective for complex skills simulation training to increase retention after three months.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综合利用间隔效应和测试效应对复杂技能培训的重要性:一项准实验研究。
简介保留复杂的临床技能是一项重大挑战。间隔训练和测试已被证明可以提高知识和技能的保持率,但在复杂的临床技能方面,还没有人对两者的结合进行过研究。我们的研究旨在比较基础生命支持(BLS)和高级生命支持(ALS)模拟训练中间隔训练和测试相结合的效果,一组(干预组)采用间隔训练和测试相结合的方法,另一组(对照组)采用单次模拟训练,不进行测试:方法:准实验研究:干预组有 13 名护理专业学生,对照组有 18 名。三个月后,BLS 知识(p > 0.05)和 BLS 技能(p p > 0.05)的保留率没有显著下降,但干预组的保留率显著下降(p p 讨论:这是第一项研究证明,在复杂的技能模拟训练中,间隔和测试相结合可以非常有效地提高三个月后的保留率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Teacher
Medical Teacher 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Edgar Dale's Pyramid of Learning in medical education: Is it still a scientific myth after Ken Masters' research? To use or not to use: ERIC database for medical education research. "They already trusted us a lot": Allied health students' experiences of an innovative hospital, service-focussed placement model. Response to: 'When reality no longer meets the curriculum, what needs to adapt?' The importance of combined use of spacing and testing effects for complex skills training: A quasi-experimental study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1