Renata Vicente Soares, Rafaela Batista Dos Santos Pedrosa, John Sandars, Dario Cecilio-Fernandes
{"title":"The importance of combined use of spacing and testing effects for complex skills training: A quasi-experimental study.","authors":"Renata Vicente Soares, Rafaela Batista Dos Santos Pedrosa, John Sandars, Dario Cecilio-Fernandes","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2427735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A major challenge is retention of complex clinical skills. Spacing training and testing have been demonstrated to increase knowledge and skill retention but the combination has not been previously investigated in complex clinical skills. The aim of our study was to compare the effectiveness of combined spacing and testing for Basic Life Support (BLS) and Advance Life Support (ALS) simulation training in one group (intervention group), with combined spacing and testing, and another group (control) that received simulation training in a single-session simulation training without testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen nursing students were in the intervention group and 18 in the control group. After three months, there was no significant reduction in retention of BLS knowledge (<i>p</i> > 0.05) or BLS skills (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the intervention group, but there was a significant reduction in both (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the control group. We found no significant reduction in retention of ALS knowledge in the control group (<i>p</i> > 0.05), but there was a significant reduction in the intervention group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There was no significant decay of ALS skills in both groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This is the first study to demonstrate that combined spacing and testing could be highly effective for complex skills simulation training to increase retention after three months.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2427735","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: A major challenge is retention of complex clinical skills. Spacing training and testing have been demonstrated to increase knowledge and skill retention but the combination has not been previously investigated in complex clinical skills. The aim of our study was to compare the effectiveness of combined spacing and testing for Basic Life Support (BLS) and Advance Life Support (ALS) simulation training in one group (intervention group), with combined spacing and testing, and another group (control) that received simulation training in a single-session simulation training without testing.
Methods: A quasi-experimental study.
Results: Thirteen nursing students were in the intervention group and 18 in the control group. After three months, there was no significant reduction in retention of BLS knowledge (p > 0.05) or BLS skills (p < 0.05) in the intervention group, but there was a significant reduction in both (p < 0.05) in the control group. We found no significant reduction in retention of ALS knowledge in the control group (p > 0.05), but there was a significant reduction in the intervention group (p < 0.05). There was no significant decay of ALS skills in both groups (p < 0.05).
Discussion: This is the first study to demonstrate that combined spacing and testing could be highly effective for complex skills simulation training to increase retention after three months.
期刊介绍:
Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.