Julia C. Beker , Martin J. Dorahy , Jaimee Moir , Jacinta Cording
{"title":"Inter-identity amnesia and memory transfer in dissociative identity disorder: A systematic review with a meta-analysis","authors":"Julia C. Beker , Martin J. Dorahy , Jaimee Moir , Jacinta Cording","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Individuals with dissociative identity disorder (DID) often report an inability to retrieve memories associated with other identities, termed inter-identity amnesia (IIA). Research investigating IIA has amassed, and interest surrounds whether objective deficits in retrieval mechanisms necessarily underlie the experience of IIA. This study conducted a systematic literature review with meta-analyses to examine current findings on IIA in DID. In particular, we explored whether DID patients' clinical reports of retrieval failure across identities were substantiated by controlled measures of memory. Nineteen empirical and four case studies informed the systematic review. The meta-analyses comprised twelve of the included studies. The systematic review findings suggested a degree of inter-identity memory transfer, a conclusion which was supported by two of the four meta-analyses. The remaining two meta-analyses evidenced patterns closer to IIA. Closer examination drew attention to methodological considerations that may limit definitive conclusions drawn from present studies. These include substantial heterogeneity between participants' scores which is masked by group statistics, a small and homogenous cumulative sample, limited research teams, and minimal domains of memory assessed. The paper urges a nuanced understanding of the phenomenon of IIA in light of current findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102514"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001351","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Individuals with dissociative identity disorder (DID) often report an inability to retrieve memories associated with other identities, termed inter-identity amnesia (IIA). Research investigating IIA has amassed, and interest surrounds whether objective deficits in retrieval mechanisms necessarily underlie the experience of IIA. This study conducted a systematic literature review with meta-analyses to examine current findings on IIA in DID. In particular, we explored whether DID patients' clinical reports of retrieval failure across identities were substantiated by controlled measures of memory. Nineteen empirical and four case studies informed the systematic review. The meta-analyses comprised twelve of the included studies. The systematic review findings suggested a degree of inter-identity memory transfer, a conclusion which was supported by two of the four meta-analyses. The remaining two meta-analyses evidenced patterns closer to IIA. Closer examination drew attention to methodological considerations that may limit definitive conclusions drawn from present studies. These include substantial heterogeneity between participants' scores which is masked by group statistics, a small and homogenous cumulative sample, limited research teams, and minimal domains of memory assessed. The paper urges a nuanced understanding of the phenomenon of IIA in light of current findings.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology.
While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.