Association between sagittal abdominal diameter-to-height ratio and all-cause mortality among adults in the United States: a longitudinal study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Archives of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1186/s13690-024-01443-w
Xi Gu, Ping Gao, Fanfan Zhu, Ying Shen, Leiqun Lu
{"title":"Association between sagittal abdominal diameter-to-height ratio and all-cause mortality among adults in the United States: a longitudinal study.","authors":"Xi Gu, Ping Gao, Fanfan Zhu, Ying Shen, Leiqun Lu","doi":"10.1186/s13690-024-01443-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The global health crisis of obesity has prompted a need for better indicators of abdominal obesity than body mass index, with sagittal abdominal diameter emerging as a potential candidate. Nonetheless, the association between sagittal abdominal diameter-to-height ratio (SADHtR) and mortality remains inadequately established. Our objective was to contribute novel evidence to this association.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study encompassed 12,572 participants aged 18-80 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2016. Mortality data were tracked until December 31, 2019. Weighted multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were employed to evaluate the association between SADHtR and all-cause mortality, with subgroup analyses conducted for result robustness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following a median follow-up period of 69 months, each standard deviation (SD) increase in SADHtR was consistently associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality across three models, yielding a hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.51(1.29,1.76) in model 3. Additionally, compared to the first tertile of SADHtR, the third tertile exhibited a higher risk for all-cause mortality, with HRs(95%CIs) of 1.58(1.25,2.01) in model 1, 2.01(1.33,3.02) in model 2, and 1.74(1.19,2.57) in model 3. Notably, subgroup analysis revealed persistent positive associations between SADHtR and all-cause mortality among subgroups based on age-at-risk (< 65, ≥ 65 years), sex, diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elevated SADHtR was consistently associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality in American adults. Regular SADHtR measurement should be considered to be integrated into clinical practice and healthcare examinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"82 1","pages":"213"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562676/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01443-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The global health crisis of obesity has prompted a need for better indicators of abdominal obesity than body mass index, with sagittal abdominal diameter emerging as a potential candidate. Nonetheless, the association between sagittal abdominal diameter-to-height ratio (SADHtR) and mortality remains inadequately established. Our objective was to contribute novel evidence to this association.

Methods: This study encompassed 12,572 participants aged 18-80 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2016. Mortality data were tracked until December 31, 2019. Weighted multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were employed to evaluate the association between SADHtR and all-cause mortality, with subgroup analyses conducted for result robustness.

Results: Following a median follow-up period of 69 months, each standard deviation (SD) increase in SADHtR was consistently associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality across three models, yielding a hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.51(1.29,1.76) in model 3. Additionally, compared to the first tertile of SADHtR, the third tertile exhibited a higher risk for all-cause mortality, with HRs(95%CIs) of 1.58(1.25,2.01) in model 1, 2.01(1.33,3.02) in model 2, and 1.74(1.19,2.57) in model 3. Notably, subgroup analysis revealed persistent positive associations between SADHtR and all-cause mortality among subgroups based on age-at-risk (< 65, ≥ 65 years), sex, diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia.

Conclusions: Elevated SADHtR was consistently associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality in American adults. Regular SADHtR measurement should be considered to be integrated into clinical practice and healthcare examinations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国成年人腹部矢状面直径与身高比率与全因死亡率之间的关系:一项纵向研究。
背景:肥胖引发的全球健康危机促使人们需要比体重指数更好的腹部肥胖指标,腹部矢状径成为潜在的候选指标。然而,腹部矢状径身高比(SADHtR)与死亡率之间的关系仍未得到充分证实。我们的目标是为这一关联提供新的证据:这项研究涵盖了 2011-2016 年全国健康与营养调查中年龄在 18-80 岁之间的 12,572 名参与者。死亡率数据追踪至 2019 年 12 月 31 日。研究采用加权多变量 Cox 比例危险模型评估 SADHtR 与全因死亡率之间的关系,并进行亚组分析以确保结果的稳健性:中位随访期为69个月,在三个模型中,SADHtR每增加一个标准差(SD),全因死亡风险就会增加,模型3的危险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)为1.51(1.29,1.76)。此外,与 SADHtR 的第一个三分位数相比,第三个三分位数的全因死亡风险更高,模型 1 中的 HRs(95%CIs)为 1.58(1.25,2.01),模型 2 中的 HRs(95%CIs)为 2.01(1.33,3.02),模型 3 中的 HRs(95%CIs)为 1.74(1.19,2.57)。值得注意的是,亚组分析显示,在基于风险年龄的亚组中,SADHtR 与全因死亡率之间持续存在正相关关系(结论:SADHtR 升高与全因死亡率之间存在正相关关系:在美国成年人中,SADHtR 升高一直与较高的全因死亡风险相关。应考虑将定期 SADHtR 测量纳入临床实践和医疗保健检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
期刊最新文献
Identifying risk factors for postpartum depression in Mashhad, Iran, 2017-2024: a population-based case-control study. Navigating CDC recognition for the National DPP in socially vulnerable communities: barriers, facilitators, and recommendations. Assessing the transferability potential of policy practices for older people. Healthy ageing for older adult people with intellectual disability: a scoping review. Analysis of factors influencing attrition among clinical traditional Chinese medical major graduates: based on a discrete choice experiment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1