Assembling the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Social Care Toolkit: A Modified Delphi Study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Academic Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2024.102599
Hannah Barber Doucet, Raymen Rammy Assaf, Kristol Das, Natalie J Tedford, Danielle Graff, Eric W Fleegler
{"title":"Assembling the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Social Care Toolkit: A Modified Delphi Study.","authors":"Hannah Barber Doucet, Raymen Rammy Assaf, Kristol Das, Natalie J Tedford, Danielle Graff, Eric W Fleegler","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2024.102599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pediatric emergency department is a high-value site for screening and resource referral for health-related social needs. However, best practices for this unique environment remain unclear. This study's objective was to introduce a consensus-based social care training toolkit for the pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a modified Delphi study to establish consensus on social care practice and develop a user-friendly toolkit. Initially, five priority areas (sections) were identified. Participants reviewed literature and shared their expertise to draft preliminary sections of the toolkit. Two rounds of the modified Delphi process were conducted, involving a ranking system, significant qualitative feedback, and a final approval stage, resulting in the finalized toolkit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen participants were included in the Delphi process, including pediatric and general EM faculty and trainees, as well as a social worker and public health professor. Forty-two content items were ranked in the first Delphi round. Based on a combination of score cut-off and extensiveness of qualitative comments, items were either minorly edited and kept (29%) or sent back to their section for review (71%). The second Delphi round integrated further suggested edits, and all participants in this final round approved the publicly available version of the toolkit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By utilizing diverse sources of information and a consensus-driven process of the modified Delphi, we generated best practice recommendations for the design, implementation, and training of social care programs in the PEM setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"102599"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2024.102599","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The pediatric emergency department is a high-value site for screening and resource referral for health-related social needs. However, best practices for this unique environment remain unclear. This study's objective was to introduce a consensus-based social care training toolkit for the pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) setting.

Methods: We conducted a modified Delphi study to establish consensus on social care practice and develop a user-friendly toolkit. Initially, five priority areas (sections) were identified. Participants reviewed literature and shared their expertise to draft preliminary sections of the toolkit. Two rounds of the modified Delphi process were conducted, involving a ranking system, significant qualitative feedback, and a final approval stage, resulting in the finalized toolkit.

Results: Seventeen participants were included in the Delphi process, including pediatric and general EM faculty and trainees, as well as a social worker and public health professor. Forty-two content items were ranked in the first Delphi round. Based on a combination of score cut-off and extensiveness of qualitative comments, items were either minorly edited and kept (29%) or sent back to their section for review (71%). The second Delphi round integrated further suggested edits, and all participants in this final round approved the publicly available version of the toolkit.

Conclusion: By utilizing diverse sources of information and a consensus-driven process of the modified Delphi, we generated best practice recommendations for the design, implementation, and training of social care programs in the PEM setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组装儿科急诊医学社会关怀工具包:改良德尔菲研究。
背景:儿科急诊室是筛查与健康相关的社会需求并进行资源转介的高价值场所。然而,针对这一独特环境的最佳实践仍不明确。本研究的目的是为儿科急诊医学(PEM)环境引入基于共识的社会关怀培训工具包:我们进行了一项改良的德尔菲研究,以就社会关怀实践达成共识,并开发一个用户友好型工具包。最初,我们确定了五个优先领域(部分)。参与者查阅文献,分享专业知识,起草工具包的初步章节。经过两轮修改后的德尔菲流程,包括排序系统、重要的定性反馈以及最后的批准阶段,最终确定了工具包:17名参与者参与了德尔菲过程,其中包括儿科和普通急诊科的教师和受训人员,以及一名社会工作者和公共卫生教授。在第一轮德尔菲过程中,对 42 个内容项目进行了排序。根据分数分界线和定性评论的广泛性,对项目进行了小幅编辑和保留(29%),或发回其部门进行审查(71%)。第二轮德尔菲讨论进一步采纳了编辑建议,最后一轮讨论的所有参与者都批准了工具包的公开版本:通过利用不同的信息来源和改良德尔菲法的共识驱动过程,我们为 PEM 环境中社会护理项目的设计、实施和培训提出了最佳实践建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
期刊最新文献
A Narrative Review of Key Studies in Medical Education in 2023: Applying the Current Literature to Educational Practice and Scholarship. My Father's Daughter and Doctor. Quality Initiative to Increase Early Initiation and Series Completion of HPV Vaccine and its Impact on Health Disparities. Adverse Childhood Experiences and Insufficient Sleep. An Untold Story: The Feelings of Pediatric Residents Early in the Covid-19 Pandemic and What They Can Teach Us Today.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1