Influence of Voice Focus on Auditory Feedback Control of Speech Using Long-Term Average Spectrum, Phon Spectrum, and Accelerometry.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00051
Shao-Hsuan Lee, Guo-She Lee
{"title":"Influence of Voice Focus on Auditory Feedback Control of Speech Using Long-Term Average Spectrum, Phon Spectrum, and Accelerometry.","authors":"Shao-Hsuan Lee, Guo-She Lee","doi":"10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigates the effect of voice-focus adjustments on oronasal balance and auditory feedback control of speech via analyzing spectral distribution, perceived loudness, and nasal vibrations during sustained phonation and passage reading.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-five speech-language pathologists sustained /a/ and read passages with forward, backward, and natural voice focuses in quiet and noisy conditions. The low-frequency power (LFP) below 3 Hz of vocal fundamental frequency was analyzed to access audio-vocal feedback control. Long-term average spectra of speech were converted to phon spectra based on equal-loudness contours ISO 226:2003 to estimate perceived loudness of self-voice across different conditions. Nasal vibrations were also recorded using a digital accelerometer to measure oronasal coupling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forward-focused voice enhanced the nasal acceleration and reduced LFP, suggesting that increasing the degree of oronasal coupling can improve audio-vocal feedback control compared to natural and backward-focused voices. Voice-focus adjustments were most related to average power and phon values in the 0.2- to 0.3-kHz band. In noise, perceived loudness in the 0.5- to 2.3-kHz band effectively predicted LFP, outperforming the average spectral power of the same band.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Voice-focus adjustments significantly impact both the acoustic transfer function of the vocal tract and the spontaneous fine-tuning of audio-vocal integration. This influence becomes particularly pronounced when sound intensity or perceived loudness is changed within the frequency range of 0.2-2.3 kHz, depending on the voice focus selected by the speakers.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27183483.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00051","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the effect of voice-focus adjustments on oronasal balance and auditory feedback control of speech via analyzing spectral distribution, perceived loudness, and nasal vibrations during sustained phonation and passage reading.

Method: Twenty-five speech-language pathologists sustained /a/ and read passages with forward, backward, and natural voice focuses in quiet and noisy conditions. The low-frequency power (LFP) below 3 Hz of vocal fundamental frequency was analyzed to access audio-vocal feedback control. Long-term average spectra of speech were converted to phon spectra based on equal-loudness contours ISO 226:2003 to estimate perceived loudness of self-voice across different conditions. Nasal vibrations were also recorded using a digital accelerometer to measure oronasal coupling.

Results: Forward-focused voice enhanced the nasal acceleration and reduced LFP, suggesting that increasing the degree of oronasal coupling can improve audio-vocal feedback control compared to natural and backward-focused voices. Voice-focus adjustments were most related to average power and phon values in the 0.2- to 0.3-kHz band. In noise, perceived loudness in the 0.5- to 2.3-kHz band effectively predicted LFP, outperforming the average spectral power of the same band.

Conclusions: Voice-focus adjustments significantly impact both the acoustic transfer function of the vocal tract and the spontaneous fine-tuning of audio-vocal integration. This influence becomes particularly pronounced when sound intensity or perceived loudness is changed within the frequency range of 0.2-2.3 kHz, depending on the voice focus selected by the speakers.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27183483.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用长期平均频谱、音谱和加速度测量法分析语音焦点对语音听觉反馈控制的影响
目的:本研究通过分析持续发音和朗读段落时的频谱分布、感知响度和鼻腔振动,研究语音焦点调整对口鼻平衡和语音听觉反馈控制的影响:方法:25 名语言病理学家在安静和嘈杂的环境中持续发音 /a/,并以正向、反向和自然语音聚焦的方式朗读段落。对声带基频 3 赫兹以下的低频功率(LFP)进行分析,以获得声带反馈控制。根据等响度等值线 ISO 226:2003,将语音的长期平均频谱转换为语音频谱,以估计不同条件下自我声音的感知响度。此外,还使用数字加速度计记录鼻腔振动,以测量口鼻耦合:结果:与自然语音和后向语音相比,前向语音增强了鼻腔加速度,降低了 LFP,这表明增加口鼻耦合度可以改善声音反馈控制。声音聚焦调整与 0.2 至 0.3 千赫频带的平均功率和音值关系最大。在噪音中,0.5-2.3 千赫兹频段的感知响度能有效预测 LFP,其效果优于同一频段的平均频谱功率:结论:声音聚焦调整对声道的声学传递函数和声-声整合的自发微调都有重大影响。当声音强度或感知响度在 0.2-2.3 kHz 频率范围内发生变化时,这种影响尤为明显,这取决于扬声器选择的声音焦点。补充材料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27183483。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
19.20%
发文量
538
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.
期刊最新文献
A Methodological Review of Stimuli Used for Classroom Speech-in-Noise Tests. Cochlear Implant Sound Quality. Aerodynamic Threshold Measures for Reflecting Glottal Closure in Voice Disorders. Characterizing Physiologic Swallowing Impairment Profiles: A Large-Scale Exploratory Study of Head and Neck Cancer, Stroke, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Dementia, and Parkinson's Disease. Linguistic Markers of Subtle Cognitive Impairment in Connected Speech: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1