Skeletal muscle relaxant for the treatment of fibromyalgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1136/rapm-2024-105776
Chung Hin Shing, Fengfeng Wang, Lai Ning Lydia Lau, Pui Ming Lam, Hung Chak Ho, Stanley Sau Ching Wong
{"title":"Skeletal muscle relaxant for the treatment of fibromyalgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Chung Hin Shing, Fengfeng Wang, Lai Ning Lydia Lau, Pui Ming Lam, Hung Chak Ho, Stanley Sau Ching Wong","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/importance: </strong>Fibromyalgia is a complex chronic pain disorder that significantly impairs patient well-being. Evaluating the efficacy of muscle relaxants for treating fibromyalgia is crucial for improving patient care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of muscle relaxants in patients with fibromyalgia.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library. The search included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing skeletal muscle relaxants with placebo/active analgesics for fibromyalgia. The primary outcome was pain intensity, measured by standardized mean difference (SMD) in pain scores. The risk of bias of included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Instrument for Randomized Controlled Trials.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>14 RCTs (1851 participants) were included. Muscle relaxants were associated with a small but statistically significant reduction in pain scores compared with placebo or active treatment (SMD=-0.24, 95% CI=-0.32 to -0.15, p<0.001, 95% prediction interval=-0.40 to -0.08), with no significant inconsistency (I<sup>2</sup>=0, 95% CI=0% to 50.79%) and a moderate Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation rating. Secondary outcomes showed small, but statistically significant improvements in depression, fatigue and sleep quality. Muscle relaxants were associated with increased incidence of overall adverse effects, fatigue, abnormal taste, and drug withdrawal due to adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Moderate quality evidence showed that muscle relaxants were associated with a small reduction in pain intensity for patients with fibromyalgia.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105776","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/importance: Fibromyalgia is a complex chronic pain disorder that significantly impairs patient well-being. Evaluating the efficacy of muscle relaxants for treating fibromyalgia is crucial for improving patient care.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of muscle relaxants in patients with fibromyalgia.

Evidence review: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library. The search included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing skeletal muscle relaxants with placebo/active analgesics for fibromyalgia. The primary outcome was pain intensity, measured by standardized mean difference (SMD) in pain scores. The risk of bias of included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Instrument for Randomized Controlled Trials.

Findings: 14 RCTs (1851 participants) were included. Muscle relaxants were associated with a small but statistically significant reduction in pain scores compared with placebo or active treatment (SMD=-0.24, 95% CI=-0.32 to -0.15, p<0.001, 95% prediction interval=-0.40 to -0.08), with no significant inconsistency (I2=0, 95% CI=0% to 50.79%) and a moderate Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation rating. Secondary outcomes showed small, but statistically significant improvements in depression, fatigue and sleep quality. Muscle relaxants were associated with increased incidence of overall adverse effects, fatigue, abnormal taste, and drug withdrawal due to adverse effects.

Conclusions: Moderate quality evidence showed that muscle relaxants were associated with a small reduction in pain intensity for patients with fibromyalgia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗纤维肌痛的骨骼肌松弛剂:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景/重要性:纤维肌痛是一种复杂的慢性疼痛疾病,严重损害患者的健康。评估肌肉松弛剂治疗纤维肌痛的疗效对于改善患者护理至关重要:本研究旨在评估肌肉松弛剂对纤维肌痛患者的镇痛效果:我们使用 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 Cochrane Library 进行了全面的文献检索。该检索包括将骨骼肌松弛剂与治疗纤维肌痛的安慰剂/有效镇痛剂进行比较的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结果是疼痛强度,以疼痛评分的标准化平均差(SMD)来衡量。采用科克伦随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具对纳入的 RCT 进行了偏倚风险评估:共纳入了 14 项随机对照试验(1851 名参与者)。与安慰剂或积极治疗相比,肌肉松弛剂可使疼痛评分略有下降,但具有统计学意义(SMD=-0.24,95% CI=-0.32至-0.15,P2=0,95% CI=0%至50.79%),推荐、评估、发展和评价等级为中等。次要结果显示,抑郁、疲劳和睡眠质量的改善幅度较小,但具有统计学意义。肌肉松弛剂与总体不良反应、疲劳、味觉异常和因不良反应而停药的发生率增加有关:中度质量的证据显示,肌肉松弛剂与纤维肌痛患者疼痛强度的小幅降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and risk factors for chronic postamputation pain requiring analgesia or nerve interventions: a population-based study in East Asia. Clinical study of a micro-implantable pulse generator for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain: 12-month results from the COMFORT-randomized controlled trial. Axonal sensitivity and block dynamics. Intra-articular corticosteroid injections versus platelet-rich plasma as a treatment for cervical facetogenic pain: a randomized clinical trial. Structural changes in the nociceptive system induced by long-term conventional spinal cord stimulation in experimental painful diabetic polyneuropathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1