Effect of stellate ganglion block on brain hemodynamics and the inflammatory response in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a pilot study.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1136/rapm-2024-106185
Ivan Kostadinov, Jernej Avsenik, Josko Osredkar, Ales Jerin, Primoz Gradisek
{"title":"Effect of stellate ganglion block on brain hemodynamics and the inflammatory response in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a pilot study.","authors":"Ivan Kostadinov, Jernej Avsenik, Josko Osredkar, Ales Jerin, Primoz Gradisek","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-106185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is often associated with reduced cerebral blood flow and an increased inflammatory response, leading to secondary brain damage. Stellate ganglion block (SGB) has been shown to improve cerebral hemodynamics in non-TBI, but its effects in TBI are still unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This prospective pilot study investigates the effects of SGB on cerebral hemodynamics and neuroinflammatory responses in patients with moderate to severe TBI with the aim of evaluating its potential as a therapeutic intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, single-center observational study was conducted in 20 patients with moderate to severe TBI. SGB was performed ipsilateral to the most severely affected hemisphere using an ultrasound-guided lateral approach at the level of C6 with 8 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine. The primary outcome was the change in blood flow velocity in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery as measured by transcranial color-coded duplex ultrasonography before and after the procedure. Secondary outcomes included changes in (a) the diameter of the basal arteries of the brain as measured by computed angiography tomography; (b) cerebral blood flow, volume and time to peak as measured by computed perfusion tomography; (c) cerebral perfusion pressure, intracranial pressure and brain oxygenation. The changes in the biomarkers of inflammation and brain injury interleukin 6, neuron-specific enolase, protein S100B and glial fibrillar acidic protein measured at baseline, 12 hours and 24 hours after SGB were defined as tertiary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SGB significantly reduced blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery, increased the diameter of the large basal cerebral arteries, improved cerebral blood flow and volume in certain brain regions on the ipsilateral side. Inflammatory markers such as IL-6 and S100B decreased significantly within 24 hours. The intracranial pressure decreased, the cerebral perfusion pressure and the oxygen supply to the brain tissue improved after SGB. No adverse events were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SGB modulates cerebral hemodynamics and lowers intracranial pressure in patients with TBI, demonstrating its potential as a neuroprotective intervention. While these results highlight the therapeutic potential of SGB, further randomized controlled trials are needed to determine its optimal use and short-term and long-term benefits in the treatment of TBI.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04208477.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-106185","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is often associated with reduced cerebral blood flow and an increased inflammatory response, leading to secondary brain damage. Stellate ganglion block (SGB) has been shown to improve cerebral hemodynamics in non-TBI, but its effects in TBI are still unclear.

Objective: This prospective pilot study investigates the effects of SGB on cerebral hemodynamics and neuroinflammatory responses in patients with moderate to severe TBI with the aim of evaluating its potential as a therapeutic intervention.

Methods: A prospective, single-center observational study was conducted in 20 patients with moderate to severe TBI. SGB was performed ipsilateral to the most severely affected hemisphere using an ultrasound-guided lateral approach at the level of C6 with 8 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine. The primary outcome was the change in blood flow velocity in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery as measured by transcranial color-coded duplex ultrasonography before and after the procedure. Secondary outcomes included changes in (a) the diameter of the basal arteries of the brain as measured by computed angiography tomography; (b) cerebral blood flow, volume and time to peak as measured by computed perfusion tomography; (c) cerebral perfusion pressure, intracranial pressure and brain oxygenation. The changes in the biomarkers of inflammation and brain injury interleukin 6, neuron-specific enolase, protein S100B and glial fibrillar acidic protein measured at baseline, 12 hours and 24 hours after SGB were defined as tertiary outcomes.

Results: SGB significantly reduced blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery, increased the diameter of the large basal cerebral arteries, improved cerebral blood flow and volume in certain brain regions on the ipsilateral side. Inflammatory markers such as IL-6 and S100B decreased significantly within 24 hours. The intracranial pressure decreased, the cerebral perfusion pressure and the oxygen supply to the brain tissue improved after SGB. No adverse events were observed.

Conclusion: SGB modulates cerebral hemodynamics and lowers intracranial pressure in patients with TBI, demonstrating its potential as a neuroprotective intervention. While these results highlight the therapeutic potential of SGB, further randomized controlled trials are needed to determine its optimal use and short-term and long-term benefits in the treatment of TBI.

Trial registration number: NCT04208477.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
星状神经节阻滞对中度和重度脑外伤患者脑血流动力学和炎症反应的影响:一项试点研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
期刊最新文献
Unrestricted insurance coverage of buprenorphine formulations remains sparse in comparison to conventional opioids. Cadaveric study of the obturator nerve: frequency of skin innervation and the optimal site for blocking the cutaneous branch. Effect of stellate ganglion block on brain hemodynamics and the inflammatory response in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. Letter to the editor: Is medetomidine the next perioperative substance of abuse? Perineuromal hydrodissection for acute postamputation pain? An observational study in a time of war.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1