Effect of stellate ganglion block on brain hemodynamics and the inflammatory response in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a pilot study.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1136/rapm-2024-106185
Ivan Kostadinov, Jernej Avsenik, Josko Osredkar, Ales Jerin, Primoz Gradisek
{"title":"Effect of stellate ganglion block on brain hemodynamics and the inflammatory response in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a pilot study.","authors":"Ivan Kostadinov, Jernej Avsenik, Josko Osredkar, Ales Jerin, Primoz Gradisek","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-106185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is often associated with reduced cerebral blood flow and an increased inflammatory response, leading to secondary brain damage. Stellate ganglion block (SGB) has been shown to improve cerebral hemodynamics in non-TBI, but its effects in TBI are still unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This prospective pilot study investigates the effects of SGB on cerebral hemodynamics and neuroinflammatory responses in patients with moderate to severe TBI with the aim of evaluating its potential as a therapeutic intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, single-center observational study was conducted in 20 patients with moderate to severe TBI. SGB was performed ipsilateral to the most severely affected hemisphere using an ultrasound-guided lateral approach at the level of C6 with 8 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine. The primary outcome was the change in blood flow velocity in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery as measured by transcranial color-coded duplex ultrasonography before and after the procedure. Secondary outcomes included changes in (a) the diameter of the basal arteries of the brain as measured by computed angiography tomography; (b) cerebral blood flow, volume and time to peak as measured by computed perfusion tomography; (c) cerebral perfusion pressure, intracranial pressure and brain oxygenation. The changes in the biomarkers of inflammation and brain injury interleukin 6, neuron-specific enolase, protein S100B and glial fibrillar acidic protein measured at baseline, 12 hours and 24 hours after SGB were defined as tertiary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SGB significantly reduced blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery, increased the diameter of the large basal cerebral arteries, improved cerebral blood flow and volume in certain brain regions on the ipsilateral side. Inflammatory markers such as IL-6 and S100B decreased significantly within 24 hours. The intracranial pressure decreased, the cerebral perfusion pressure and the oxygen supply to the brain tissue improved after SGB. No adverse events were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SGB modulates cerebral hemodynamics and lowers intracranial pressure in patients with TBI, demonstrating its potential as a neuroprotective intervention. While these results highlight the therapeutic potential of SGB, further randomized controlled trials are needed to determine its optimal use and short-term and long-term benefits in the treatment of TBI.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04208477.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-106185","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is often associated with reduced cerebral blood flow and an increased inflammatory response, leading to secondary brain damage. Stellate ganglion block (SGB) has been shown to improve cerebral hemodynamics in non-TBI, but its effects in TBI are still unclear.

Objective: This prospective pilot study investigates the effects of SGB on cerebral hemodynamics and neuroinflammatory responses in patients with moderate to severe TBI with the aim of evaluating its potential as a therapeutic intervention.

Methods: A prospective, single-center observational study was conducted in 20 patients with moderate to severe TBI. SGB was performed ipsilateral to the most severely affected hemisphere using an ultrasound-guided lateral approach at the level of C6 with 8 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine. The primary outcome was the change in blood flow velocity in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery as measured by transcranial color-coded duplex ultrasonography before and after the procedure. Secondary outcomes included changes in (a) the diameter of the basal arteries of the brain as measured by computed angiography tomography; (b) cerebral blood flow, volume and time to peak as measured by computed perfusion tomography; (c) cerebral perfusion pressure, intracranial pressure and brain oxygenation. The changes in the biomarkers of inflammation and brain injury interleukin 6, neuron-specific enolase, protein S100B and glial fibrillar acidic protein measured at baseline, 12 hours and 24 hours after SGB were defined as tertiary outcomes.

Results: SGB significantly reduced blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery, increased the diameter of the large basal cerebral arteries, improved cerebral blood flow and volume in certain brain regions on the ipsilateral side. Inflammatory markers such as IL-6 and S100B decreased significantly within 24 hours. The intracranial pressure decreased, the cerebral perfusion pressure and the oxygen supply to the brain tissue improved after SGB. No adverse events were observed.

Conclusion: SGB modulates cerebral hemodynamics and lowers intracranial pressure in patients with TBI, demonstrating its potential as a neuroprotective intervention. While these results highlight the therapeutic potential of SGB, further randomized controlled trials are needed to determine its optimal use and short-term and long-term benefits in the treatment of TBI.

Trial registration number: NCT04208477.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
星状神经节阻滞对中度和重度脑外伤患者脑血流动力学和炎症反应的影响:一项试点研究。
外伤性脑损伤(TBI)通常与脑血流量减少和炎症反应增加相关,导致继发性脑损伤。星状神经节阻滞(SGB)已被证明可以改善非创伤性脑损伤的脑血流动力学,但其在创伤性脑损伤中的作用尚不清楚。目的:本前瞻性试点研究探讨SGB对中重度TBI患者脑血流动力学和神经炎症反应的影响,目的是评估其作为治疗干预措施的潜力。方法:对20例中重度脑外伤患者进行前瞻性、单中心观察性研究。在C6水平采用超声引导的侧位入路,在同侧受影响最严重的半球进行SGB,并使用8ml 0.5%左布比卡因。主要结果是手术前后经颅彩色编码双工超声测量的同侧大脑中动脉血流速度的变化。次要结局包括(a)通过计算机血管造影断层扫描测量的脑基底动脉直径的变化;(b)计算机灌注断层扫描测量的脑血流量、容量和达到峰值的时间;(c)脑灌注压、颅内压和脑氧合。在基线、SGB后12小时和24小时测量炎症和脑损伤生物标志物白细胞介素6、神经元特异性烯醇化酶、蛋白S100B和胶质纤维酸性蛋白的变化被定义为第三期结局。结果:SGB显著降低大脑中动脉血流速度,增加大脑基底大动脉直径,改善同侧部分脑区脑血流量和脑容量。炎症标志物如IL-6和S100B在24小时内显著降低。SGB后颅内压下降,脑灌注压和脑组织供氧改善。未观察到不良事件。结论:SGB调节脑外伤患者的脑血流动力学并降低颅内压,显示其作为神经保护干预的潜力。虽然这些结果强调了SGB的治疗潜力,但需要进一步的随机对照试验来确定其在TBI治疗中的最佳使用和短期和长期益处。试验注册号:NCT04208477。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
期刊最新文献
Better opioid responsibility: implementing novel guidance as an opioid standard of care in academic and rural settings. Debunking myths in facial pain diagnosis for the pain practitioner. Mechanistic insights into bupivacaine spread through anisotropic tissue planes and fascial barriers: experimental evidence for interfascial block dynamics. Troubleshooting sensory sparing in motor-sparing forearm blocks. What constitutes WALANT in modern hand surgery?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1