Yael Marks, Kalpesh Desai, Jaime Maerten-Rivera, Fred Doloresco, Gina M Prescott
{"title":"A Blended Learning Approach to Teaching Medication Use and Perspectives on Spirituality in Pharmacy Practice.","authors":"Yael Marks, Kalpesh Desai, Jaime Maerten-Rivera, Fred Doloresco, Gina M Prescott","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess students' proficiency and perspectives regarding the role of spirituality in pharmacy practice using a blended learning approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Students viewed online preclass videos on general spirituality and 5 major religions in the United States. Next, students attended an interactive lecture followed by a simulated counseling session. Lastly, students completed an anonymous, 38-question, electronic perspective survey. The items were grouped into scales, and the results were compared using paired-sample t tests. Effect sizes were measured by Cohen's d. Additionally, students could opt to complete a reflection assignment on this activity as part of a concurrent course. A content analysis qualitative approach was utilized to assess these reflections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All students (N = 125) completed the counseling session, and 113 (90.4%) completed the survey. The mean score on the counseling session rubric was 94.8%, demonstrating students' skills in recognizing spiritual concerns in simulated patient interactions. All perspective scale scores indicated a statistically significant change from pre to post, with the greatest change demonstrated in empathic perspective-taking (medium effect), followed by anxiety and lack of multicultural self-efficacy, religious/spiritual openness, and desire to learn (small effects). Students agreed that the instruction helped prepare them as a pharmacist (mean = 5.41) and that hearing from people with authentic experiences was valuable (mean = 5.40). Major learning themes included individualizing care, respect for beliefs, learning about diverse backgrounds, and prohibited medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Students performed well in counseling patients regarding medication-related spiritual needs using a blended learning approach. In addition, the students perceived an increase in empathy while addressing spiritual considerations in patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":" ","pages":"101324"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to assess students' proficiency and perspectives regarding the role of spirituality in pharmacy practice using a blended learning approach.
Methods: Students viewed online preclass videos on general spirituality and 5 major religions in the United States. Next, students attended an interactive lecture followed by a simulated counseling session. Lastly, students completed an anonymous, 38-question, electronic perspective survey. The items were grouped into scales, and the results were compared using paired-sample t tests. Effect sizes were measured by Cohen's d. Additionally, students could opt to complete a reflection assignment on this activity as part of a concurrent course. A content analysis qualitative approach was utilized to assess these reflections.
Results: All students (N = 125) completed the counseling session, and 113 (90.4%) completed the survey. The mean score on the counseling session rubric was 94.8%, demonstrating students' skills in recognizing spiritual concerns in simulated patient interactions. All perspective scale scores indicated a statistically significant change from pre to post, with the greatest change demonstrated in empathic perspective-taking (medium effect), followed by anxiety and lack of multicultural self-efficacy, religious/spiritual openness, and desire to learn (small effects). Students agreed that the instruction helped prepare them as a pharmacist (mean = 5.41) and that hearing from people with authentic experiences was valuable (mean = 5.40). Major learning themes included individualizing care, respect for beliefs, learning about diverse backgrounds, and prohibited medications.
Conclusion: Students performed well in counseling patients regarding medication-related spiritual needs using a blended learning approach. In addition, the students perceived an increase in empathy while addressing spiritual considerations in patient care.
期刊介绍:
The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors.
After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.