Mindfulness as a way of reducing automatic constraints on thought.

Kalina Christoff Hadjiilieva
{"title":"Mindfulness as a way of reducing automatic constraints on thought.","authors":"Kalina Christoff Hadjiilieva","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The number of mindfulness-based wellness promotion programs offered by institutions, governments, and through mobile apps, has grown exponentially in the last decade. Yet, the scientific understanding of what mindfulness is and how it works is still evolving. Here I focus on two common mindfulness practices: focused attention (FA) and open-monitoring (OM). First, I summarize what is known about FA and OM meditation at the psychological level. While they share similar emotion regulation goals, they differ in terms of some of their attention regulation goals. Second, I turn to the neuroscientific literature, showing that FA meditation is associated with consistent activations of cortical 'control' network regions and deactivations of cortical 'default' network regions. In contrast, OM meditation seems to be most consistently associated with changes in the functional connectivity patterns of subcortical structures, including the basal ganglia and cerebellum. Finally, I present a novel account of the mental changes during FA and OM meditation as understood from within the Dynamic Framework of Thought (DFT) - a conceptual framework that distinguishes between deliberate and automatic constraints on thought. Although deliberate self-regulation processes are often emphasized in scientific and public discourse on mindfulness, here I argue that mindfulness may primarily involve changes in automatic constraints on thought. In particular, I argue that mindfulness reduces the occurrence of automatized sequences of mental states, or habits of thought. In this way, mindfulness may increase the spontaneity of thought and reduce automatically constrained forms of thought such as rumination and obsessive thought.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.11.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The number of mindfulness-based wellness promotion programs offered by institutions, governments, and through mobile apps, has grown exponentially in the last decade. Yet, the scientific understanding of what mindfulness is and how it works is still evolving. Here I focus on two common mindfulness practices: focused attention (FA) and open-monitoring (OM). First, I summarize what is known about FA and OM meditation at the psychological level. While they share similar emotion regulation goals, they differ in terms of some of their attention regulation goals. Second, I turn to the neuroscientific literature, showing that FA meditation is associated with consistent activations of cortical 'control' network regions and deactivations of cortical 'default' network regions. In contrast, OM meditation seems to be most consistently associated with changes in the functional connectivity patterns of subcortical structures, including the basal ganglia and cerebellum. Finally, I present a novel account of the mental changes during FA and OM meditation as understood from within the Dynamic Framework of Thought (DFT) - a conceptual framework that distinguishes between deliberate and automatic constraints on thought. Although deliberate self-regulation processes are often emphasized in scientific and public discourse on mindfulness, here I argue that mindfulness may primarily involve changes in automatic constraints on thought. In particular, I argue that mindfulness reduces the occurrence of automatized sequences of mental states, or habits of thought. In this way, mindfulness may increase the spontaneity of thought and reduce automatically constrained forms of thought such as rumination and obsessive thought.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正念是一种减少思维自动限制的方法。
在过去十年中,由机构、政府以及通过移动应用程序提供的以正念为基础的健康促进计划的数量呈指数级增长。然而,人们对正念是什么以及正念如何发挥作用的科学认识仍在不断发展。在此,我将重点介绍两种常见的正念练习:集中注意力(FA)和开放式监控(OM)。首先,我从心理学层面总结了目前对正念冥想和开放式监控冥想的了解。虽然它们有着相似的情绪调节目标,但在某些注意力调节目标方面却有所不同。其次,我转向神经科学文献,这些文献表明,FA 冥想与大脑皮层 "控制 "网络区域的持续激活和大脑皮层 "默认 "网络区域的失活有关。相比之下,OM 冥想似乎与皮层下结构(包括基底神经节和小脑)功能连接模式的变化最为一致。最后,我对FA冥想和OM冥想过程中的心理变化进行了新颖的阐述,这是从思维动态框架(DFT)--一种区分思维的刻意约束和自动约束的概念框架--中理解的。尽管在关于正念的科学和公共讨论中,人们经常强调有意的自我调节过程,但在这里,我认为正念可能主要涉及对思维的自动约束的变化。特别是,我认为正念会减少心理状态自动化序列或思维习惯的发生。因此,正念可以增加思维的自发性,减少反刍和强迫性思维等自动约束的思维形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hypoactivation of ventromedial frontal cortex in major depressive disorder: an MEG study of the Reward Positivity. Aperiodic (1/f) neural activity robustly tracks symptom severity changes in treatment-resistant depression. Increased Amygdala Activation during Symptom Provocation Predicts Response to Combined Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Exposure Therapy in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in a Randomized Controlled Trial. Decoding mindfulness with multivariate predictive models. The reward positivity as a predictor of first lifetime onsets of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation in high-risk adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1