Agency selling or reselling: The impact of logistics service on selling mode choice

Gang Li , Zhijun Zheng , T.C.E. Cheng , Wei Wang , Feng Wu
{"title":"Agency selling or reselling: The impact of logistics service on selling mode choice","authors":"Gang Li ,&nbsp;Zhijun Zheng ,&nbsp;T.C.E. Cheng ,&nbsp;Wei Wang ,&nbsp;Feng Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2024.103849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Logistics service affects product sales and therefore plays a vital role in influencing the selling mode strategy. We investigate how two types of logistics service, namely third-party service and platform service, impact the selling mode choice between reselling and agency selling. We identify that the platform’s commission rate and product-service efficiency jointly shape the selling mode strategy. Surprisingly, in a market with third-party service, reselling mitigates double marginalization more than agency selling given high commission rates and product-service efficiency. As a result, the platform favors reselling in situations with relatively low or relatively high commission rates and product-service efficiency, and agency selling for other scenarios. However, in a market with platform service, the platform adopts agency selling (reselling) if product-service efficiency is low (high). Furthermore, we explore how the adoption of platform service changes the selling mode for the platform. Interestingly, we discover that, after the service changes from third-party service to platform service, the selling mode may change from reselling to agency selling (or from agency selling to reselling) in situations with both low commission rates and product-service efficiency (or with high commission rates and medium product-service efficiency). In addition, platform service can benefit both the platform and supplier.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 103849"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136655452400440X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Logistics service affects product sales and therefore plays a vital role in influencing the selling mode strategy. We investigate how two types of logistics service, namely third-party service and platform service, impact the selling mode choice between reselling and agency selling. We identify that the platform’s commission rate and product-service efficiency jointly shape the selling mode strategy. Surprisingly, in a market with third-party service, reselling mitigates double marginalization more than agency selling given high commission rates and product-service efficiency. As a result, the platform favors reselling in situations with relatively low or relatively high commission rates and product-service efficiency, and agency selling for other scenarios. However, in a market with platform service, the platform adopts agency selling (reselling) if product-service efficiency is low (high). Furthermore, we explore how the adoption of platform service changes the selling mode for the platform. Interestingly, we discover that, after the service changes from third-party service to platform service, the selling mode may change from reselling to agency selling (or from agency selling to reselling) in situations with both low commission rates and product-service efficiency (or with high commission rates and medium product-service efficiency). In addition, platform service can benefit both the platform and supplier.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
代理销售还是转售:物流服务对销售模式选择的影响
物流服务影响产品销售,因此在影响销售模式战略方面起着至关重要的作用。我们研究了两类物流服务,即第三方服务和平台服务,如何影响转售和代理销售之间的销售模式选择。我们发现,平台佣金率和产品服务效率共同决定了销售模式策略。令人惊讶的是,在有第三方服务的市场中,由于高佣金率和产品服务效率,转售比代理销售更能缓解双重边缘化。因此,在佣金率和产品服务效率相对较低或相对较高的情况下,平台更倾向于转售,而在其他情况下则倾向于代理销售。然而,在有平台服务的市场中,如果产品服务效率低(高),平台就会采用代理销售(转售)。此外,我们还探讨了平台服务的采用如何改变平台的销售模式。有趣的是,我们发现,当服务从第三方服务转变为平台服务后,在低佣金率和产品服务效率(或高佣金率和中等产品服务效率)的情况下,销售模式可能会从转售转变为代理销售(或从代理销售转变为转售)。此外,平台服务可使平台和供应商双方受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management. Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Fleet sizing and pricing for hybrid ownership of shared autonomous vehicles in a multimodal transportation system Supplier and platform led games of supplier encroachment Data-driven resilience analysis of the global container shipping network against two cascading failures Towards advanced decision-making support for shipping safety: A functional connectivity analysis The Impact of ISSB’s Scope 3 GHG Emissions Validation on US Manufacturers’ Stock Valuations: Analyzing the Role of Supplier Complexity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1