Enhancing customer perception of co-production knowledge sharing: navigating scepticism and leveraging prosociality to unlock active feedback behaviour in co-creation

IF 6.6 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Knowledge Management Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1108/jkm-01-2024-0076
Shadrach Twumasi Ankrah, Zheng He, Jason Kobina Arku, Lydia Asare-Kyire
{"title":"Enhancing customer perception of co-production knowledge sharing: navigating scepticism and leveraging prosociality to unlock active feedback behaviour in co-creation","authors":"Shadrach Twumasi Ankrah, Zheng He, Jason Kobina Arku, Lydia Asare-Kyire","doi":"10.1108/jkm-01-2024-0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Drawing on the reciprocity principle of social exchange theory situated within Service-dominant Logic, this study aims to examine how customers’ perception of knowledge sharing in co-production, their inherent scepticism and prosocial orientation relate to their willingness to co-create and provide feedback on services. The authors also explored the interplay between these factors to identify conditions in configurations comprising scepticism, which may help navigate its adverse effects.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The authors surveyed 556 online and offline mobile payment service users. They used a combination of partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) to assess the relationships among variables, and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to identify configurations associated with feedback behaviour.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The study determined that customer perception of co-production knowledge sharing is positively associated with willingness to co-create and feedback behaviour. Additionally, prosocial orientation positively affects this relationship, while scepticism has an adverse effect. Willingness to co-create mediates the relationship between customer perception of co-production knowledge sharing and feedback behaviour. The fsQCA findings revealed configurations for potentially navigating doubts regarding feedback. To encourage valuable customer feedback, businesses may consider promoting a collaborative and supportive atmosphere, emphasising shared advantages or building trust even among hesitant and doubtful individuals.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study uniquely examines how both prosocial tendencies and scepticism relate to customer feedback behaviour in co-creation by using a hybrid PLS-SEM/fsQCA approach to identify co-existing conditions in configurations comprising scepticism that may help navigate its adverse effects and leverage customer feedback for business improvement.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knowledge Management","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-01-2024-0076","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Drawing on the reciprocity principle of social exchange theory situated within Service-dominant Logic, this study aims to examine how customers’ perception of knowledge sharing in co-production, their inherent scepticism and prosocial orientation relate to their willingness to co-create and provide feedback on services. The authors also explored the interplay between these factors to identify conditions in configurations comprising scepticism, which may help navigate its adverse effects.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors surveyed 556 online and offline mobile payment service users. They used a combination of partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) to assess the relationships among variables, and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to identify configurations associated with feedback behaviour.

Findings

The study determined that customer perception of co-production knowledge sharing is positively associated with willingness to co-create and feedback behaviour. Additionally, prosocial orientation positively affects this relationship, while scepticism has an adverse effect. Willingness to co-create mediates the relationship between customer perception of co-production knowledge sharing and feedback behaviour. The fsQCA findings revealed configurations for potentially navigating doubts regarding feedback. To encourage valuable customer feedback, businesses may consider promoting a collaborative and supportive atmosphere, emphasising shared advantages or building trust even among hesitant and doubtful individuals.

Originality/value

This study uniquely examines how both prosocial tendencies and scepticism relate to customer feedback behaviour in co-creation by using a hybrid PLS-SEM/fsQCA approach to identify co-existing conditions in configurations comprising scepticism that may help navigate its adverse effects and leverage customer feedback for business improvement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增强客户对共同生产知识共享的感知:引导怀疑态度,利用亲社会性释放共同创造中的积极反馈行为
目的根据服务主导逻辑中社会交换理论的互惠原则,本研究旨在探讨客户对共同生产中知识共享的看法、他们固有的怀疑态度和亲社会取向与他们共同创造服务和提供反馈的意愿之间的关系。作者还探讨了这些因素之间的相互作用,以确定构成怀疑论的配置条件,这可能有助于消除其不利影响。设计/方法/途径 作者调查了 556 名在线和离线移动支付服务用户。他们结合使用了偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)来评估变量之间的关系,并结合使用了模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)来确定与反馈行为相关的配置。研究结果该研究确定,客户对共同生产知识共享的感知与共同创造的意愿和反馈行为正相关。此外,亲社会导向会对这种关系产生积极影响,而怀疑则会产生不利影响。共同创造的意愿在顾客对共同生产知识共享的认知与反馈行为之间起到了中介作用。FsQCA 的研究结果揭示了可能消除反馈疑虑的配置。为了鼓励有价值的客户反馈,企业可以考虑促进协作和支持性氛围,强调共享优势或建立信任,即使是在犹豫不决和心存疑虑的个人中。 原创性/价值 本研究通过使用混合 PLS-SEM/fsQCA 方法,独特地研究了在共同创造过程中,亲社会倾向和怀疑态度与客户反馈行为之间的关系,从而确定了怀疑态度配置中的共存条件,这可能有助于引导怀疑态度的不利影响,并利用客户反馈改善业务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
15.70%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: Knowledge Management covers all the key issues in its field including: ■Developing an appropriate culture and communication strategy ■Integrating learning and knowledge infrastructure ■Knowledge management and the learning organization ■Information organization and retrieval technologies for improving the quality of knowledge ■Linking knowledge management to performance initiatives ■Retaining knowledge - human and intellectual capital ■Using information technology to develop knowledge management ■Knowledge management and innovation ■Measuring the value of knowledge already within an organization ■What lies beyond knowledge management?
期刊最新文献
Knowledge spillovers between R&D-driven incumbents and start-ups in open innovation: a systematic review and nomological network Digital knowledge management in agile self-tuning organisations: a multiple case study Unleashing cultural diversity knowledge for improved knowledge sharing and integration: an in-depth qualitative analysis AI-empowered KM processes for decision-making: empirical evidence from worldwide organisations Enhancing customer perception of co-production knowledge sharing: navigating scepticism and leveraging prosociality to unlock active feedback behaviour in co-creation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1